Bulldogga55 wrote:I Agree S Demon, ABSOULUTE DISGRACE. SAAFL must have peanuts for brains....
-There was no hot water in the visitors showers as well.
-Only 2 showers worked.
- Cold pies in the canteen.
-Had to walk 546km to where my car was parked
I've been to watch all games when i can this season, but afer looking at the conditions through the window on saturday morning i made the descision not to go tot he game, a tough decision at that...
My reasoning was that there would be little to no shelter at the ground, no area where the ground would be hard eg concrete etc, no fixed sheltering if the conditions got unbearable eg clubrooms, possibility of no food outlets, miniature scoreboard which could not be seen from across the ground in dry conditions let alone of the rain was teaming down, impossibility of parking around the ground, area you have to walk in possible torrentual rain to get to the actual oval, which is still a hike even if you manage to get a park close to the oval.
I have no issues over plympton not getting a home final because of their contactual agreements with the brewer, no worries at all, but for Pulteney to get a final when the facilities are so far below standard which should be set for a final is rediculous...
This is just another case where the SAAFL are more interested in the allmighty $$$ (sponsorship aggreements) than the actual standard of football for which they are entrusted to govern.
There are grounds dotted all across the south western area which would have been fine to host a match that would hand the winner automatic entry into a grand final and a higher division. The fact that the parkland were given the green light is ridiculous.