by SteveStevens » Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:12 pm
by Dragons » Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:58 pm
SteveStevens wrote:Final score, Westminster OS up by 50 points, 18.11 119 to 10.9 69.
by emerson » Sat Sep 05, 2009 7:34 pm
by sprinttospace » Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:09 pm
emerson wrote:What the hell has happened today? Plympton have gone down again, they will be absolutely shattered. And Hope Valley B grade....... I thought they were hot favorites to win the flag this year. Funny game football..... Anyone give a rap up of the games today for us that had to work
by heater31 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:25 pm
by S Demon » Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:26 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:38 am
sprinttospace wrote:emerson wrote:What the hell has happened today? Plympton have gone down again, they will be absolutely shattered. And Hope Valley B grade....... I thought they were hot favorites to win the flag this year. Funny game football..... Anyone give a rap up of the games today for us that had to work
westminster controlled the game. plympton struggled in the first quarter defensively getting it out of the w'minster forward line. when they did they seemed to turn it over.
pympton seemed to take an hour to get going. their thrid quarter was good and they threatened to get right back into it. it was possibly out of their reach with a 7 to 2 goal first half deficit.
some ordinary umpiring decisions in the first half , bordering on soft. but the umps seemed to save their best for the third quarter with some very strange / inconsistent decisions, 2 in the plympton forward line and two yellow cards in one hit. somehow they picked two plympton players out of a 20 player scuffle on the outer side after a plympton goal and then gave w'misnter the ball in the middle. one of the two players sent off was 20-30 meters away from the 'fracas' when it started so who knows what he did.
an interesting three quarter time address by the w'minster coach. it obviously got them back on track as they kicked the first 2 in a few minutes and it was game done.
w'minster to tall and too much run. warburton very good in first half, radley and malcolm to tall, ferris bobbing up, wigg a general in defence, easton the extra tall in the forward line, allen marshalling his troops, harris i think it was took a courageous mark running back with the flight of the ball which resulted in a goal. the list goes on. way too good.
the best two teams across the journey this year imo to face off in the GF and go to div 4. well done to both clubs and good luck next week. pulteney for me with the weeks break and their miserly defence.
for plympton another painful finals series. belts our coach often says 'what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger'.
by possum » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:53 am
sprinttospace wrote:emerson wrote:What the hell has happened today? Plympton have gone down again, they will be absolutely shattered. And Hope Valley B grade....... I thought they were hot favorites to win the flag this year. Funny game football..... Anyone give a rap up of the games today for us that had to work
westminster controlled the game. plympton struggled in the first quarter defensively getting it out of the w'minster forward line. when they did they seemed to turn it over.
pympton seemed to take an hour to get going. their thrid quarter was good and they threatened to get right back into it. it was possibly out of their reach with a 7 to 2 goal first half deficit.
some ordinary umpiring decisions in the first half , bordering on soft. but the umps seemed to save their best for the third quarter with some very strange / inconsistent decisions, 2 in the plympton forward line and two yellow cards in one hit. somehow they picked two plympton players out of a 20 player scuffle on the outer side after a plympton goal and then gave
w'misnter the ball in the middle. one of the two players sent off was 20-30 meters away from the 'fracas' when it started so who knows what he did.
an interesting three quarter time address by the w'minster coach. it obviously got them back on track as they kicked the first 2 in a few minutes and it was game done.
w'minster to tall and too much run. warburton very good in first half, radley and malcolm to tall, ferris bobbing up, wigg a general in defence, easton the extra tall in the forward line, allen marshalling his troops, harris i think it was took a courageous mark running back with the flight of the ball which resulted in a goal. the list goes on. way too good.
the best two teams across the journey this year imo to face off in the GF and go to div 4. well done to both clubs and good luck next week. pulteney for me with the weeks break and their miserly defence.
for plympton another painful finals series. belts our coach often says 'what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger'.
by zedman » Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:03 am
by Bully » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:13 am
S Demon wrote:Div 5 Prelim
Plympton 10.09 69 v 18.11 119 Westminster OS
Div 5R Prelim
Hope Valley 07.07 49 v 10.11 71 Westminster OS
by The Bartman » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:29 am
woodublieve12 wrote:sprinttospace wrote:emerson wrote:What the hell has happened today? Plympton have gone down again, they will be absolutely shattered. And Hope Valley B grade....... I thought they were hot favorites to win the flag this year. Funny game football..... Anyone give a rap up of the games today for us that had to work
westminster controlled the game. plympton struggled in the first quarter defensively getting it out of the w'minster forward line. when they did they seemed to turn it over.
pympton seemed to take an hour to get going. their thrid quarter was good and they threatened to get right back into it. it was possibly out of their reach with a 7 to 2 goal first half deficit.
some ordinary umpiring decisions in the first half , bordering on soft. but the umps seemed to save their best for the third quarter with some very strange / inconsistent decisions, 2 in the plympton forward line and two yellow cards in one hit. somehow they picked two plympton players out of a 20 player scuffle on the outer side after a plympton goal and then gave w'misnter the ball in the middle. one of the two players sent off was 20-30 meters away from the 'fracas' when it started so who knows what he did.
an interesting three quarter time address by the w'minster coach. it obviously got them back on track as they kicked the first 2 in a few minutes and it was game done.
w'minster to tall and too much run. warburton very good in first half, radley and malcolm to tall, ferris bobbing up, wigg a general in defence, easton the extra tall in the forward line, allen marshalling his troops, harris i think it was took a courageous mark running back with the flight of the ball which resulted in a goal. the list goes on. way too good.
the best two teams across the journey this year imo to face off in the GF and go to div 4. well done to both clubs and good luck next week. pulteney for me with the weeks break and their miserly defence.
for plympton another painful finals series. belts our coach often says 'what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger'.
very good write up... WOS were supperp today, i will give credit were credits due.... Very painful loss. boys are hurting after another prelim loss...you cant win games of footy when you turn over the footy and be second to the ball as much as we were.... i was interchange steward and i still dont uderstand why our players got sent off, even though a WOS player started it and provoked it, the bloke 6ft something pickn on a little fella.... anyways if WOS play like that nxt week they will go back to back....
on to the reserves game i saw today, im ot to sure what hope valley were doing today (no disrepect)... i thought they were a shoe in.... didnt help ther best player was injured in the 1st quarter... however the footy they were playn they never looked in it.... you cant win games of footy when your not playing accountable football..... again no direspect.... HV full forward was awsum, very smart footballer..... i think he kicked 5 or 6..... wos were good most the day 41 was good and number 2 oin the wing..... shuold be a cracker next week... can't wait!!!!
by Lance's brother » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:43 am
by TIRED TIGER » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:55 am
by Footy Chick » Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:20 am
TIRED TIGER wrote:yes the b grade were dissapointing in both finals. i think the uneveness of the competition causes you to become a tad complacent (and lazy) when winning by 20 goals more weeks than not, then when the real deal arrives and its game on those bad habits are found out big time. would like to congratulate dean on his six years as B grade coach and wish him well. been a great club member and not just a coach and i"m sure will make a good A grade coach if given the opportunity. good luck deano,
by Lance's brother » Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:37 am
sprinttospace wrote:
an interesting three quarter time address by the w'minster coach. it obviously got them back on track as they kicked the first 2 in a few minutes and it was game done.
by The Bartman » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:57 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:yes the b grade were dissapointing in both finals. i think the uneveness of the competition causes you to become a tad complacent (and lazy) when winning by 20 goals more weeks than not, then when the real deal arrives and its game on those bad habits are found out big time. would like to congratulate dean on his six years as B grade coach and wish him well. been a great club member and not just a coach and i"m sure will make a good A grade coach if given the opportunity. good luck deano,
by sprinttospace » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:29 pm
Lance's brother wrote:sprinttospace wrote:
an interesting three quarter time address by the w'minster coach. it obviously got them back on track as they kicked the first 2 in a few minutes and it was game done.
I'm not sure what you mean here... what was interesting about it?
by heater31 » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:49 pm
sprinttospace wrote:Lance's brother wrote:sprinttospace wrote:
an interesting three quarter time address by the w'minster coach. it obviously got them back on track as they kicked the first 2 in a few minutes and it was game done.
I'm not sure what you mean here... what was interesting about it?
it was more about asking for another 30 minutes of effort and discipline than what structurally needed to be done to stop their run. great confidence in the the players and the planning done before the game.
being involved with a club you don't get to hear to many other coaches speak so it is always interesting to listen. it was similar to his 3 qtr time address in the gf last year. its also a learning opportunity to see other teams in your own div play each other.
there was no doubt that if your guys got back to shutting them down and forcing them wide for 5-10 minutes then that would be enough to get the result.
by Lance's brother » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:01 pm
heater31 wrote:sprinttospace wrote:
it was more about asking for another 30 minutes of effort and discipline than what structurally needed to be done to stop their run. great confidence in the the players and the planning done before the game.
being involved with a club you don't get to hear to many other coaches speak so it is always interesting to listen. it was similar to his 3 qtr time address in the gf last year. its also a learning opportunity to see other teams in your own div play each other.
there was no doubt that if your guys got back to shutting them down and forcing them wide for 5-10 minutes then that would be enough to get the result.
I will back that up. Listened to the 1/4 time address. Spoke extremely well in a high pressure game from the side that settled first.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |