by big red supporter » Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:18 am
by bandar » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:00 am
by schimma » Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:33 pm
by piccachu » Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:09 pm
Smosh West lakes B&F
A grade
Callum Masson B&F
James Cibich runner up
by Mr Butterworth » Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:30 pm
by Greenshields27 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:35 pm
by BIG_REDS » Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:07 pm
piccachu wrote:Smosh West lakes B&F
A grade
Callum Masson B&F
James Cibich runner up
was very surprised when i heard nitchatowski didnt win the b&f to come second in the medal and not finish top 2 at your club is a bit strange, also heard from a few mates there was on bloke in the A grade at smosh who wasnt hapy with how many votes he got, aparently sooked the whole way through the count.
by Scouser » Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:44 pm
BIG_REDS wrote:piccachu wrote:Smosh West lakes B&F
A grade
Callum Masson B&F
James Cibich runner up
was very surprised when i heard nitchatowski didnt win the b&f to come second in the medal and not finish top 2 at your club is a bit strange, also heard from a few mates there was on bloke in the A grade at smosh who wasnt hapy with how many votes he got, aparently sooked the whole way through the count.
similar story at Para Hills. i was just as surprised when i heard Thach didnt win the b&f or come in the top 2 despit coming 3rd in the medal, i also heard that another player wasnt happy with his finishing position and was sooking throughout the count at finishing 3rd
by blackcat » Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:32 pm
by NO-MERCY » Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:53 pm
blackcat wrote:What club doesn't have a player or players believing they are better than what they are. As for players finishing high up in the assocciation counts and not in their club counts just shows you that the umpires ARE NOT ALWAYS RIGHT. Isnt it a team game?
by THACHY_7 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:34 pm
BIG_REDS wrote:piccachu wrote:Smosh West lakes B&F
A grade
Callum Masson B&F
James Cibich runner up
was very surprised when i heard nitchatowski didnt win the b&f to come second in the medal and not finish top 2 at your club is a bit strange, also heard from a few mates there was on bloke in the A grade at smosh who wasnt hapy with how many votes he got, aparently sooked the whole way through the count.
similar story at Para Hills. i was just as surprised when i heard Thach didnt win the b&f or come in the top 2 despit coming 3rd in the medal, i also heard that another player wasnt happy with his finishing position and was sooking throughout the count at finishing 3rd
by piccachu » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:04 pm
Jus clearing up that i wasnt the guy that was sooking during the count...
I dont even remember the count, so i cant sook about where i came, cos i didnt even know where i finished
by Shirtfront » Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:23 pm
by Scorpion » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:07 pm
blackcat wrote:What club doesn't have a player or players believing they are better than what they are. As for players finishing high up in the assocciation counts and not in their club counts just shows you that the umpires ARE NOT ALWAYS RIGHT. Isnt it a team game?
by RHM 17 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:20 pm
Scorpion wrote:blackcat wrote:What club doesn't have a player or players believing they are better than what they are. As for players finishing high up in the assocciation counts and not in their club counts just shows you that the umpires ARE NOT ALWAYS RIGHT. Isnt it a team game?
Could also mean the people at the club voting are not always right - I have been asked on occasions at a club (even had an opposition once ask me) to cast my 3-2-1, but I have a habit of holding grudges and wont give 3 to someone I think is a knob - so I won't do it. Have also seen many times club vote cards given to guys/chicks that have been drinking all the way through the B's and are expected to cast votes on the A's - or fathers/brothers/cousins etc etc of players who are unabashedly biased....
by steiger » Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:22 am
Scorpion wrote:Could also mean the people at the club voting are not always right - I have been asked on occasions at a club (even had an opposition once ask me) to cast my 3-2-1, but I have a habit of holding grudges and wont give 3 to someone I think is a knob - so I won't do it. Have also seen many times club vote cards given to guys/chicks that have been drinking all the way through the B's and are expected to cast votes on the A's - or fathers/brothers/cousins etc etc of players who are unabashedly biased....
by Robran » Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:50 am
by steiger » Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:55 am
Robran wrote:b lodge voting is done by the senior coach both A grade assistant coaches and the b grade coach the voting system works like this every player is voted on from 1 to 7 in every game 1 is obvisouly no impact on game and 7 being a outstanding game, so i think this way is fair to players that play consistently week in and week out and would think it will be a exciting count on nov 7th.
so 1 no impact or injured early
2 below average
3 average game
4 exceptable game
5 good game
6 very good game
7 outstanding game
believe its something like this anyway...
by aceman » Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:01 am
by zedman » Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:38 am
aceman wrote:Gepps Cross as follows and voted by the Coach, Assistant Coach and a nominated other person;
5,4,3,2,1 basis which gives a maximum of 15 votes with 45 votes in total available per game.
Since this has been implimented a few years back, most has gone according to the way it has appeared during the season.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |