1250express wrote:isnt any vote selfish aceman? at the end of the day you vote to have your say on matters so to call it selfish is perhaps a little unfair. and of course it was because of time and travel reasons. junior parents and players do not want to travel 150km at 730in the morning if they can avoid it.
No not always! If something is in the best interest of the competition and has benefits then you make a positive judgement, if it's not then your judgement is in the negative. I understand the reasoning for it but why would clubs like TV, Kersbrook and those closer vote NO based on a distance factor? To prop up the vote for Kangy, Maccy etc maybe?
But talking to a few guys from clubs up there, it is perceived as an invasion by outsiders so was bound to fail, regardless of any positives.