by JK » Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:48 am
by Hondo » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:08 am
by JK » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:15 am
Hondo wrote:CP I have been putting off seeing 2012 for exactly the reasons you have posted. What I feared appears confirmed! I'll wait until it's a weekly if it isn't already.
by whufc » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:07 am
by JK » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:23 am
whufc wrote:Knight and Day
Tom Cruise is awful in this.
the movie is court between being an out and out comedy or being an action movie
has a very akward feel to it.
by Gingernuts » Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:05 pm
by MadMax » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:08 pm
Gingernuts wrote:Watched 2001: A Space Odyssey last night for the first time.
I definitely learnt something from it - folks were on some serious gear back in the 60's.![]()
![]()
Seriously one of the weirdest movies I've seen. In the context of the time that it was made I can see how it was quite a ground breaking movie. That said, it wasn't my cup of tea.
by Magpiespower » Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:49 am
by MightyEagles » Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:13 am
by Gingernuts » Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:00 am
MadMax wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Watched 2001: A Space Odyssey last night for the first time.
I definitely learnt something from it - folks were on some serious gear back in the 60's.![]()
![]()
Seriously one of the weirdest movies I've seen. In the context of the time that it was made I can see how it was quite a ground breaking movie. That said, it wasn't my cup of tea.
I totally agree... everyone says what a masterpiece Kubricks films are: 2001, Clockwork Orange, Dr Strangelove, Full Metal Jacket......that one where Nicole Kidman gets her norks out (Eyes Wide Shut).... I don't get it. I usually recognise great stories, great character development, great acting but all of these are pretty ordinary.
Every director has his niche. Tarantino, Scorcese, Spielberg, M Night Shyamalan, Hitchcock etc etc and what Kubrick does is..... good, but as far as a good movie goes, something is... lacking. Sure he makes you think, which isnt a bad thing in movies and he certainly knows how to push boundaries, but as far as entertaining the avrage movie goer? I think he fails
I'm sure critics disagree, but i can't see the entertainment.
by Magpiespower » Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:38 am
by CK » Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:54 am
Magpiespower wrote:
Local film The Marriage of Figaro screened on Channel 9 on Christmas Day.
Understandable why distributors wouldn't touch it.
Not even amateur hour.
Embarrassingly bad.
WORST Australian film this decade. Makes a nice companion piece to Spank!, the worst Australian film of the 90s. Also made in Adelaide...
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 27, 2010 1:46 pm
by Magpiespower » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:55 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:21 am
by LMA » Mon Jan 03, 2011 10:18 am
Magpiespower wrote:
Local film The Marriage of Figaro screened on Channel 9 on Christmas Day.
Understandable why distributors wouldn't touch it.
Not even amateur hour.
Embarrassingly bad.
WORST Australian film this decade. Makes a nice companion piece to Spank!, the worst Australian film of the 90s. Also made in Adelaide...
by Magpiespower » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:14 pm
by gadj1976 » Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:30 pm
Magpiespower wrote:Unfunny comedy double last night.
In the Loop and Hot Tub Time Machine.
Maybe a laugh between them...
by bayman » Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:39 pm
by Booney » Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:53 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |