
by Full Stop » Sun Mar 27, 2011 6:18 pm
by mighty hounds » Sun Mar 27, 2011 6:47 pm
Richie rich wrote:Give me a break comparing country leagues and SAAFL is crap. who cares.
If you don't care don't comment pretty simple
by no_remorse28 » Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:25 pm
TW Rooster wrote:Richie rich wrote:Give me a break comparing country leagues and SAAFL is crap. who cares.
If you don't care don't comment pretty simple
It does not mean two shits about the standard or comparing the leagues. A trial is for sorting out game plans and seeing new players.
by mighty hounds » Sun Mar 27, 2011 7:46 pm
no_remorse28 wrote:TW Rooster wrote:Richie rich wrote:Give me a break comparing country leagues and SAAFL is crap. who cares.
If you don't care don't comment pretty simple
It does not mean two shits about the standard or comparing the leagues. A trial is for sorting out game plans and seeing new players.
The bloke was just asking for a comparison, not a definition of a trial match, Maybe if you know and he doesn't you can just tell him where the skill level of Willaston might compare to the SAAFL
by That Old Chestnut » Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:05 pm
TW Rooster wrote:no_remorse28 wrote:TW Rooster wrote:Richie rich wrote:Give me a break comparing country leagues and SAAFL is crap. who cares.If you don't care don't comment pretty simple
It does not mean two shits about the standard or comparing the leagues. A trial is for sorting out game plans and seeing new players.
The bloke was just asking for a comparison, not a definition of a trial match, Maybe if you know and he doesn't you can just tell him where the skill level of Willaston might compare to the SAAFL
Div 1
by MOHAMMAD » Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:30 pm
by Lethal Dose » Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:45 pm
Richie rich wrote:Went down to have a look at willaston play on friday night against kilburn can't say that i walked away with much confidence that willaston are going to be any major threat this year. They played very predictable football for mine with all there movement going through there big blonde FF who at times had 2 or 3 to beat. Willaston was lucky to win Kilburn just run out of legs. Kilburn were the better side all night and in my views got the raw end of the stick from the blokes in white.The game wasn't played in great spirits with quite a few scuffles breaking out throught the match. Willaston'S CHF with tatoo's everywhere got sent off for something behind the play in which i have to say didn't look good, Not sure there was any reports but i found it very amusing players from BOTH SIDES even bothered with the carry on in a trial game. I understand that it is near on impossibe to judge the standard difference between the leagues but surely the BLG is a better standard than a div 4 SAAFL. I would be interested in anyone's views on where they think the BLG rates in standard compared to the SAAFL.
by Mighty Bird » Sun Mar 27, 2011 10:48 pm
by Lethal Dose » Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:30 pm
by Maybe » Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:34 am
by AKA » Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:55 am
Maybe wrote:Comparing A1 to BLG
I have played in both
BLG is A2 standard
Its different football, A1 players are bigger, fitter and the game is faster
Tanunda would finish outside top 5, and Barossa's 2 premiership sides would have finished there also
A2 yes i agree both would have been Grand Finalists
Players as mentioned above would be great A1 footballers, eg Last year Turner, Leal A1 medal winners
BLG is a great standard of football, but dont get carried away, A1 is the best outside SANFL
by Shirtfront » Tue Mar 29, 2011 12:11 pm
AKA wrote:Maybe wrote:Comparing A1 to BLG
I have played in both
BLG is A2 standard
Its different football, A1 players are bigger, fitter and the game is faster
Tanunda would finish outside top 5, and Barossa's 2 premiership sides would have finished there also
A2 yes i agree both would have been Grand Finalists
Players as mentioned above would be great A1 footballers, eg Last year Turner, Leal A1 medal winners
BLG is a great standard of football, but dont get carried away, A1 is the best outside SANFL
agree with you mate played in both and div 1 is far better comp. Tanunda would play finals in div 1 maybe a qualifying final. Thats as far as they would get. Div 1 is better than SANFL res as far as im concerned
by StickyFingers » Tue Mar 29, 2011 12:47 pm
MOHAMMAD wrote:I hear a big Melee broke out. When all the dust settled there were 2 x McLeans and 2 x Bakers
by Dr. Pink » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:49 pm
MOHAMMAD wrote:I hear a big Melee broke out. When all the dust settled there were 2 x McLeans and 2 x Bakers
by Maybe » Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:14 am
by jumbo » Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:50 am
by Swamp Donkey » Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:58 am
AKA wrote:Maybe wrote:Comparing A1 to BLG
I have played in both
BLG is A2 standard
Its different football, A1 players are bigger, fitter and the game is faster
Tanunda would finish outside top 5, and Barossa's 2 premiership sides would have finished there also
A2 yes i agree both would have been Grand Finalists
Players as mentioned above would be great A1 footballers, eg Last year Turner, Leal A1 medal winners
BLG is a great standard of football, but dont get carried away, A1 is the best outside SANFL
agree with you mate played in both and div 1 is far better comp. Tanunda would play finals in div 1 maybe a qualifying final. Thats as far as they would get. Div 1 is better than SANFL res as far as im concerned
by stun72 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:10 am
jumbo wrote:Are nuri playing against port (sgl) this sat?
by The Patriach » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:05 pm
stun72 wrote:jumbo wrote:Are nuri playing against port (sgl) this sat?
Nuri are playing Waikerie at Waikerie this Saturday.
by BoundaryRider84 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:14 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |