by hawkseye » Sun May 15, 2011 9:11 pm
by Ian » Mon May 16, 2011 7:41 am
stan wrote:Ian wrote:stan wrote: No worries there at all except when your on here listed as a North Adelaide supporter that supports a club wearing Port Magpie colours, I reckon you could see how we all thought you were a North Haven person.
Must admit I thought the same thing, can't believe a NAFC supporter would follow a magpies side because the are the same colours as PortI played in PA magpies (primary school) and Colligwood colours as a kid because that's what my local one club towns colours were, not because of Port!!
Mate I wasn't saying there was anything wrong with it, just that it's pretty odd considering the loving relationsjip Port and North have.
by woodublieve12 » Mon May 16, 2011 1:33 pm
catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
by giffo » Mon May 16, 2011 2:27 pm
TIRED TIGER wrote:I would like to thank the two B grade umpires from Lockleys and Hope Valley for doing a half each of the A grade when one of the Official SAAFL umpires didn't show up.Well done fellas after doing the B grade game beforehand and probably did as good as job as any umpires we have had this season.![]()
Thanks also to lockleys footy club,good people and good facilities
by Masha » Mon May 16, 2011 5:25 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
i thought up to half time it was very even. both sides had trouble getting a clean possesion. thats due to the pressure both sides were applying. then as jabber said probably the last quarter when pfc kicked away.. as like every lutheran side you are tall and some good runners... you love having runners of the back of packs and playing your talls (or ruckmen) cross half back.. dont think that game plan has changed for few years now... all 3 grades do it... regardless of that it was a bloody good of footy... both sides goin at it all day... always enjoy lutheran v pfc matches...
plympton b;s have now lost 5 in a row.. been a while since that happen... however they have alot of youngsters with a very different side then the past 3 years... they'll turn it around for sure.
by hollywood7477 » Mon May 16, 2011 6:31 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
i thought up to half time it was very even. both sides had trouble getting a clean possesion. thats due to the pressure both sides were applying. then as jabber said probably the last quarter when pfc kicked away.. as like every lutheran side you are tall and some good runners... you love having runners of the back of packs and playing your talls (or ruckmen) cross half back.. dont think that game plan has changed for few years now... all 3 grades do it... regardless of that it was a bloody good of footy... both sides goin at it all day... always enjoy lutheran v pfc matches...
plympton b;s have now lost 5 in a row.. been a while since that happen... however they have alot of youngsters with a very different side then the past 3 years... they'll turn it around for sure.
by woodublieve12 » Mon May 16, 2011 6:47 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
i thought up to half time it was very even. both sides had trouble getting a clean possesion. thats due to the pressure both sides were applying. then as jabber said probably the last quarter when pfc kicked away.. as like every lutheran side you are tall and some good runners... you love having runners of the back of packs and playing your talls (or ruckmen) cross half back.. dont think that game plan has changed for few years now... all 3 grades do it... regardless of that it was a bloody good of footy... both sides goin at it all day... always enjoy lutheran v pfc matches...
plympton b;s have now lost 5 in a row.. been a while since that happen... however they have alot of youngsters with a very different side then the past 3 years... they'll turn it around for sure.
Wub12 has Troy hilder retired. Did he play last year or did he hang the boots up a cpl of years ago. The grant the club received is fantastic. I hear bruiser had been working on that for a number of years. Will make the clubs facilities even better than they already are.
by hollywood7477 » Mon May 16, 2011 6:55 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:hollywood7477 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
i thought up to half time it was very even. both sides had trouble getting a clean possesion. thats due to the pressure both sides were applying. then as jabber said probably the last quarter when pfc kicked away.. as like every lutheran side you are tall and some good runners... you love having runners of the back of packs and playing your talls (or ruckmen) cross half back.. dont think that game plan has changed for few years now... all 3 grades do it... regardless of that it was a bloody good of footy... both sides goin at it all day... always enjoy lutheran v pfc matches...
plympton b;s have now lost 5 in a row.. been a while since that happen... however they have alot of youngsters with a very different side then the past 3 years... they'll turn it around for sure.
Wub12 has Troy hilder retired. Did he play last year or did he hang the boots up a cpl of years ago. The grant the club received is fantastic. I hear bruiser had been working on that for a number of years. Will make the clubs facilities even better than they already are.
yeah he played last year.... retired at the end of it.. he is missed... top bloke and a gun player...
yeah its a fantastic effort by bruiser and the sub committee to aquire the grant.. goin to be very handy round the club, the club will be extended at the carpark end, make the home changerooms bigger. new lighting for the oval, which will be very handy as the current ones are junk... there is a few other thingsgetting done but there the big ones... oh and a disabled toilet outside....
they have have done a great job down the club.... i may be biased but i think pfc already has the best clubrooms not just in d5 but would certainly be up there in the whole of saafl.
by Vincent Vega » Tue May 17, 2011 9:33 am
by Jabber » Tue May 17, 2011 10:13 am
Vincent Vega wrote:You can have the best club rooms (which I doubt) but if you don't fill it with the right people (players included) you'll be in Div 5 forever!!!
by woodublieve12 » Tue May 17, 2011 10:50 am
Vincent Vega wrote:You can have the best club rooms (which I doubt) but if you don't fill it with the right people (players included) you'll be in Div 5 forever!!!
by Drop Bear » Tue May 17, 2011 10:56 am
Vincent Vega wrote:You can have the best club rooms (which I doubt) but if you don't fill it with the right people (players included) you'll be in Div 5 forever!!!
by woodublieve12 » Tue May 17, 2011 10:57 am
Drop Bear wrote:Vincent Vega wrote:You can have the best club rooms (which I doubt) but if you don't fill it with the right people (players included) you'll be in Div 5 forever!!!
Vincent rates the dunnies though.
by Vincent Vega » Tue May 17, 2011 11:24 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Vincent Vega wrote:You can have the best club rooms (which I doubt) but if you don't fill it with the right people (players included) you'll be in Div 5 forever!!!
Vincent rates the dunnies though.
brilliant
by hollywood7477 » Tue May 17, 2011 11:30 am
Vincent Vega wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Vincent Vega wrote:You can have the best club rooms (which I doubt) but if you don't fill it with the right people (players included) you'll be in Div 5 forever!!!
Vincent rates the dunnies though.
brilliant
Its funny you should mention the toilets because there not the only things Full of sh*t down at PFC!
Your nice fancy club rooms just means...... PFC = Mutton dressed up as lamb
by Mighty Bird » Tue May 17, 2011 11:31 am
woodublieve12 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
i thought up to half time it was very even. both sides had trouble getting a clean possesion. thats due to the pressure both sides were applying. then as jabber said probably the last quarter when pfc kicked away.. as like every lutheran side you are tall and some good runners... you love having runners of the back of packs and playing your talls (or ruckmen) cross half back.. dont think that game plan has changed for few years now... all 3 grades do it... regardless of that it was a bloody good of footy... both sides goin at it all day... always enjoy lutheran v pfc matches...
plympton b;s have now lost 5 in a row.. been a while since that happen... however they have alot of youngsters with a very different side then the past 3 years... they'll turn it around for sure.
by woodublieve12 » Tue May 17, 2011 11:48 am
Mighty Bird wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:catchisthecry wrote:What were your thoughts on Lutheran wood??
Very disappointing result for the boys, they are a capable side with some star players, but struggling to put 4 quarters together by the sound.
Beauty of Div 5 this year is each sides just a win from the top 5.... but also a loss or two from relegation zone.
i thought up to half time it was very even. both sides had trouble getting a clean possesion. thats due to the pressure both sides were applying. then as jabber said probably the last quarter when pfc kicked away.. as like every lutheran side you are tall and some good runners... you love having runners of the back of packs and playing your talls (or ruckmen) cross half back.. dont think that game plan has changed for few years now... all 3 grades do it... regardless of that it was a bloody good of footy... both sides goin at it all day... always enjoy lutheran v pfc matches...
plympton b;s have now lost 5 in a row.. been a while since that happen... however they have alot of youngsters with a very different side then the past 3 years... they'll turn it around for sure.
What is happening with the Plympton B's? Have been a bloody good side over the past few years but seem to be lacking something this year...is the depth of the club struggling? or is it that people have retired?
Would like to haer some thoughts...
by FLYING DUTCHMAN 18 » Tue May 17, 2011 12:18 pm
by Vincent Vega » Tue May 17, 2011 12:25 pm
by Bully » Tue May 17, 2011 6:36 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |