The Ash Man wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:could it have something to do with this????woodublieve12 wrote:from all reports coming out of plympton a number 8 king hit roach pretty gutless act, again from ALL reports.... i will chuck in allegedly as i wasnt there... just what ive been told by several witnesses and even the person involved. would like to hear from a BL point of view...
The player going to the tribunal did wear #8 that day...
ok lets get the truth out there instead of pure lies, i saw the incident and this is what happen no bulls#it but the truth here it is, number 8 is being investigated for nothing more than being ran into by a plympton player no 8 was down picking up the ball the plympton player was the one that made contact by running into no 8 .no 8 had the ball in his hand when the hit occured and then hand ball the footy to no 3 from blodge and i could quite clearly here the umpire say great bump play on. so how the hell do your so called witnesses say your player was king hit. when the player in question had the ball in his hand yes he probably braced himself for contact but your player was the one who made the contact,maybe he should of layed a tackle insted of trying to make front on contact, and how come not one of your players come over and had a go at no 8. Ill tell you why because there was nothing in this incident at all. but i guess we will see how the powers to be at saafl on tues night look at this and how much truth or bullsh#t is told. imo the player has no case to answer.