by Stewie Griffin » Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:43 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:53 pm
by BoundaryRider84 » Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:11 pm
by Bag & Sledge » Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:13 pm
ruck guru wrote:good game between willaston and goody saints. only 1 point in it and willaston missing campbell, brooks, pepe and played a couple of 17 year olds and jarryd coles 14 year old brother. i think willaston going alright. chris mclean played and also david kellet who played at centrals.
by hotspur » Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:20 pm
by Full Stop » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:02 am
Bag & Sledge wrote:ruck guru wrote:good game between willaston and goody saints. only 1 point in it and willaston missing campbell, brooks, pepe and played a couple of 17 year olds and jarryd coles 14 year old brother. i think willaston going alright. chris mclean played and also david kellet who played at centrals.
Would not read too much into the Willaston - Goody Saints game, Goody's were without 12 of their best 21 players.
by UNCLE SAM » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:15 am
by Caramels » Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:55 am
Bag & Sledge wrote:ruck guru wrote:good game between willaston and goody saints. only 1 point in it and willaston missing campbell, brooks, pepe and played a couple of 17 year olds and jarryd coles 14 year old brother. i think willaston going alright. chris mclean played and also david kellet who played at centrals.
Would not read too much into the Willaston - Goody Saints game, Goody's were without 12 of their best 21 players.
by Bag & Sledge » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:20 am
Richie rich wrote:Bag & Sledge wrote:ruck guru wrote:good game between willaston and goody saints. only 1 point in it and willaston missing campbell, brooks, pepe and played a couple of 17 year olds and jarryd coles 14 year old brother. i think willaston going alright. chris mclean played and also david kellet who played at centrals.
Would not read too much into the Willaston - Goody Saints game, Goody's were without 12 of their best 21 players.
bag and sledge thats absolute rubbish. I sat with the goodwood president yesterda along with many of the players parents and they were missing 4 first choice A grade players. Willaston looked good in patches yesterday but got opened up through the midfield with the lack of accountability. Goodwood for 3 qts controlled the match and looked to be cruising but to willastons credit they really turned it on in the last qtr.
by Skip Dimes » Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:09 pm
by MOHAMMAD » Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:50 pm
by Dizzee Rascal » Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:06 pm
Skip Dimes wrote:Surely you people should know by now that its common practise to exaggerate the quality of teams playing in a trial match. When someone says 12 blokes are missing, take that with a pinch of salt, it may be 5 or 6. When someone says they are close to full strength, they are usually foxing also.
What you can be sure about in pre season trial games, is that you cant read too much into results... What you want to see is the effort and fitness levels of some of the younger players trying to make the grade. A lot of the veterans dont even bother with Trial games.
by AKA » Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:44 pm
MOHAMMAD wrote:Feeling played Virginia yesterday and beat them easily. Dan Hornsell kicked 8 and will give some Full backs a few headaches. Benny Parish made a welcomed return.
Red legs should make a good account for themselves this year and play september football.
by jstlookin » Sun Apr 01, 2012 9:50 pm
by Ruben Carter » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:06 pm
jstlookin wrote:Made the drive down to gawler today to have a look at the south addossan game. While it was a little scrappy and took a bit to break open south looked very fit and skills where pretty good once they opened the game up. Also south looked well undermanned and where missing a fair few quality players Heath Lawry was amoungst the players that didn't play along with Leigh Makras, Jack McVicker also missing and a few more without naming them all. Good signs with a real young side and throw in a couple of the older guys that have returned and new recruits only going to get better as the season gets underway. Also while it looked like new recruit and full forward Trewen only played the first half of the game he spent a bit of time playing in the goal square and out at centre half forward he was catching nearly everything that came his way and took some real strong one on one marks and contested marks and looked really comfortable playing deep body on body in the square or leading up and hitting through the footy. Looked to be fairly fit and think he may of finished with atleast four at half time. If he can stay and mantain his fittness and avoid injury i think he will be a great pick up and cause some head ache's for a few full back's this year. Will definately be an assett and look for south to start moving up the ladder and being more than competitive with all teams this year not just the bottom few with them really struggling and not having a target or a real vocal point up forward last year and probably should have won a few more games than they did losing a hand full by under a kick or two. Also the bloke that wears the helmet and plays up forward think his name is geradis he was very handy and kicked a bag full easily. With south only lacking a few scoring options and avenues to gaol last year and looking like they have recruited well and got that sorted out this year i would think and expect them to win a few more games and be really competitive this season. Not sure they quite have the side to play deep into the finals but can see them winning a few more games and making their way north on the ladder this season.
by Jim05 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:21 pm
Ruben Carter wrote:jstlookin wrote:Made the drive down to gawler today to have a look at the south addossan game. While it was a little scrappy and took a bit to break open south looked very fit and skills where pretty good once they opened the game up. Also south looked well undermanned and where missing a fair few quality players Heath Lawry was amoungst the players that didn't play along with Leigh Makras, Jack McVicker also missing and a few more without naming them all. Good signs with a real young side and throw in a couple of the older guys that have returned and new recruits only going to get better as the season gets underway. Also while it looked like new recruit and full forward Trewen only played the first half of the game he spent a bit of time playing in the goal square and out at centre half forward he was catching nearly everything that came his way and took some real strong one on one marks and contested marks and looked really comfortable playing deep body on body in the square or leading up and hitting through the footy. Looked to be fairly fit and think he may of finished with atleast four at half time. If he can stay and mantain his fittness and avoid injury i think he will be a great pick up and cause some head ache's for a few full back's this year. Will definately be an assett and look for south to start moving up the ladder and being more than competitive with all teams this year not just the bottom few with them really struggling and not having a target or a real vocal point up forward last year and probably should have won a few more games than they did losing a hand full by under a kick or two. Also the bloke that wears the helmet and plays up forward think his name is geradis he was very handy and kicked a bag full easily. With south only lacking a few scoring options and avenues to gaol last year and looking like they have recruited well and got that sorted out this year i would think and expect them to win a few more games and be really competitive this season. Not sure they quite have the side to play deep into the finals but can see them winning a few more games and making their way north on the ladder this season.
How bad were Ardrossan?
by GWW » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:32 pm
Jim05 wrote:They were competitive in patches, a taller side than South and had a few decent looking footballers. I reckon their full forward must have kicked at least 7. Their skills were not too bad but their fitness was nowhere near Souths.
by Jim05 » Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:08 am
by MOHAMMAD » Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:13 am
by Bat Pad » Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:40 am
MOHAMMAD wrote:It seems most clubs are having a minimum of 2 even 3 trial games, should be a hot ball come round 1.
Believe that Barossa played Hahndorf or Lobethal on the weekend and won. Think that was there 3rd trial.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |