Are the SANFL being up-front?

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
Mark_Beswick
Reserves
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 9:06 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Brisbane Lions
Location: Lockleys
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Contact:

Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by Mark_Beswick »

I had it from a 3rd source yesterday that

1. PAFC will have thier AFL side, SANFL League (Reserves) side AND have some commissioners backing them for a Reserves side in the SANFL Reserves
2. The same model for the crows being discussed.

How the @#$ will either AFC or PAFC get

1. top-up players for BOTH SANFL League AND Sanfl RESERVES when they have no zones

Make plenty of noise people with your SANFL clubs, CEO's and directors.... This time we can vote people in or out at the AGM's each club has from now until next march.
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:32 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by Reddeer »

What does it matter what they do now. The whole setup is F****ked anyway
Verschrikkelyk!!
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
Posts: 5826
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 610 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by Aerie »

Hopefully they realise it will be better to have a side under the SANFL sides for both teams. Eliminates the potential farcical situation of a player playing a quarter only at SANFL level for match fitness or a rookie listed dutch handballer playing way out of his depth because there is no where else to go.
smac
Coach
Posts: 13092
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:19 am
Team: Central District
Team: Salisbury
Location: Golden Grove
Has thanked: 168 times
Been thanked: 233 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by smac »

Been talked about for weeks, clubs are apparently opposed, which means it will be voted in.
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:57 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Seaton Ramblers
Location: Port Adelaide
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 11 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by beenreal »

Mark_Beswick wrote:I had it from a 3rd source yesterday that

1. PAFC will have thier AFL side, SANFL League (Reserves) side AND have some commissioners backing them for a Reserves side in the SANFL Reserves
2. The same model for the crows being discussed.

How the @#$ will either AFC or PAFC get

1. top-up players for BOTH SANFL League AND Sanfl RESERVES when they have no zones

Make plenty of noise people with your SANFL clubs, CEO's and directors.... This time we can vote people in or out at the AGM's each club has from now until next march.


Much more important question is, how the @#$ are the Corporation (the me too's) pushing to copy Port Adelaide's developmental football structure that they never wanted in the first place?
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
Mark_Beswick
Reserves
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 9:06 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Brisbane Lions
Location: Lockleys
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by Mark_Beswick »

Good question beenreal and would you believe them if they made a public statement anyway?
holden78
League - Best 21
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:43 am
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 55 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by holden78 »

Ah, the thin edge of the wedge already!
THE CANCER BEGINS TO SPREAD like we knew it would :evil:
SimonH
Under 18s
Posts: 678
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 62 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by SimonH »

Mark_Beswick wrote:I had it from a 3rd source yesterday that

1. PAFC will have thier AFL side, SANFL League (Reserves) side AND have some commissioners backing them for a Reserves side in the SANFL Reserves
...
This isn't a matter of some whispered conspiracy involving "some commissioners". This is the official deal for the Power running teams in the SANFL competition, in particular under this heading:

Academy team
• Port Adelaide Magpies to have an academy team in the SANFL reserves competition.
• Such players receive a maximum of $100 per match at reserves level.


The use of the phrase 'Academy team' is a strange and probably inaccurate euphemism (at this stage, I doubt whether there will be any 'academy' worthy of the name, not least because the AFL wouldn't allow it), but the effect is pretty clear. And yes, the question of where the **** they will get players to play SANFL reserves in 2015, when they have no juniors (and only a very limited pool of contracted SANFL players), is a very live question.

Logically, if they don't just dump the SANFL reserves competition when they realise the problems they've signed up for, they'll get hold of players by getting the SANFL to change the rules in some way. Allowing them free or near-free access to SANFL teams' overaged ex-U/18 players who haven't been added to the senior group, is just one of what will doubtless be a long list of awesome ideas that could help 'em out.

If the Crows decide they want to field a team in the SANFL reserves comp (and we already know that what they want, they get)... <shudder>.
csbowes
League - Best 21
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:32 pm
Location: Alma
Been thanked: 77 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by csbowes »

I don't think anyone should be surprised about what happens from here on. Now that both AFL teams are in the competition, efforts will be made to ensure that those teams are balanced, competitive and given a priority over the other 8 clubs on just about anything.

The league is now about ensuring those two AFL clubs have successful SANFL (or AFLSA) teams. The league directors who voted this in will have no option but to support any proposals to strengthen them, expand their base etc, as to do otherwise would be admitting a wrongdoing.

As the honourable Reverand Lovejoy would say... "its all over people!!!".
Blackwhite
Reserves
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:52 am
Team: Payneham NU
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by Blackwhite »

csbowes wrote:As the honourable Reverand Lovejoy would say... "its all over people!!!".


As much as I will hate to admit it, it is true. The feeling is bad. It will eat away for a long time. To now know that eveyone's efforts who opposed this was worthless is disheartening. It's all over :(
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: Are the SANFL being up-front?

Post by Wedgie »

holden78 wrote:Ah, the thin edge of the wedge already!
THE CANCER BEGINS TO SPREAD like we knew it would :evil:

My edges ain't thin mate!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 190 guests