2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

Footy Smart wrote:mumford to GWS for 3rd rounder.... bargain!

they reckon GWS set to offload pick 2. you would think they have a decent player lined up?


Who is they?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by bennymacca »

Footy Smart wrote:[

Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater


they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Q. »

bennymacca wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:[

Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater


they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently


No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.
the wonder elephant
League - Best 21
Posts: 2118
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Ironbank
Location: the zoo
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 18 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by the wonder elephant »

Bernie Vince to Melbourne for pick 23 .... good luck Melbourne keeping him out of the nightclubs :-)
858
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 1788 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by daysofourlives »

Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:[

Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater


they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently


No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.


What would you know Q, you think Hogan is a midfielder ;)
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Jim05 »

the wonder elephant wrote:Bernie Vince to Melbourne for pick 23 .... good luck Melbourne keeping him out of the nightclubs :-)

LOL
Melbourne, will they ever learn
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Q. »

daysofourlives wrote:
Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:[

Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater


they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently


No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.


What would you know Q, you think Hogan is a midfielder ;)


Hogan is that good he can be anything ;)
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by bennymacca »

Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:[

Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater


they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently


No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.


No way will shaw be on 750. And maybe you should go read a bit, because gws definitely want more than just shaw for Adams
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Jim05 »

bennymacca wrote:
Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:[

Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater


they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently


No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.


No way will shaw be on 750. And maybe you should go read a bit, because gws definitely want more than just shaw for Adams

Shaw will definately get 700-750 although that is way too much for him.
But yes GWS want more than Shaw, they wont give up Adams in a straight swap. Silvagni said that he would rather trade Adams to Geelong for pick 15 than accept Collingwood's offer so far
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Q. »

GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by bennymacca »

Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.


decent pun there, WP

and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Q. »

bennymacca wrote:
Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.


decent pun there, WP

and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.


Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.

After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Jim05 »

Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.


decent pun there, WP

and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.


Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.

After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.

So Collingwood dont have to trade Shaw?
Id think the relationship would be pretty frosty, im fairly sure they are trying to run him out of town. Cant see him being at the Pies next year
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.


decent pun there, WP

and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.


Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.

After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.


Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.

Who is being the flog?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Q. »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.


decent pun there, WP

and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.


Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.

After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.


Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.

Who is being the flog?


GWS want a premiership player on a five year $3.5mil deal and want to trade an unproven rookie for him AND want one of Collingwood's picks. Yeah right.

They need Shaw way more than we need Adams.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Jim05 »

Q. wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Q. wrote:
bennymacca wrote:[quote="Q."]GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.


decent pun there, WP

and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.


Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.

After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.


Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.

Who is being the flog?


GWS want a premiership player on a five year $3.5mil deal and want to trade an unproven rookie for him AND want one of Collingwood's picks. Yeah right.

They need Shaw way more than we need Adams.[/quote]

A Premiership player that the club think is that much of a knob they are trying to piss him off.
FIGJAM always gets what he wants and if he thinks Shaw is a cockhead and wants him gone he will be gone
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

Q. wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.

Who is being the flog?


GWS want a premiership player on a five year $3.5mil deal and want to trade an unproven rookie for him AND want one of Collingwood's picks. Yeah right.

They need Shaw way more than we need Adams.


I thought you would understand market forces. Adams wanted by many. Shaw wanted by few.

It isn't as simple as here is this players stats and achievements, here is the other guys.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by Q. »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Q. wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.

Who is being the flog?


GWS want a premiership player on a five year $3.5mil deal and want to trade an unproven rookie for him AND want one of Collingwood's picks. Yeah right.

They need Shaw way more than we need Adams.


I thought you would understand market forces. Adams wanted by many. Shaw wanted by few.

It isn't as simple as here is this players stats and achievements, here is the other guys.


Actually, a number of clubs have shown interest in Shaw. Geelong, Carlton, Essendon and GWS obviously.

GWS will have egg on their faces if they can't seal this.
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

Not really. Collingwood will if they can't off load Shaw.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:53 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: 2013 - Player retirements/delistings/trade discussion

Post by stan »

Vince for 23. Eh fair enough.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], DOC, Pseudo and 145 guests