by valleys07 » Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:15 pm
by UK Fan » Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:17 pm
valleys07 wrote:So CCL- now that Adelaides beloved Mark Riccuito has come out in the below article, highlighting just how much both Port and the Crows are disadvantaged with the new move to Adelaide Oval, does this change your opinion? Or are Port still crying foul in your opinion, because a CEO with an ounce of business acumen decided to speak up about the disparity?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/a ... 6940398152
If the figures branded about in this article are accurate- shame on the SMA and the SANFL.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by heater31 » Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:19 pm
valleys07 wrote:So CCL- now that Adelaides beloved Mark Riccuito has come out in the below article, highlighting just how much both Port and the Crows are disadvantaged with the new move to Adelaide Oval, does this change your opinion? Or are Port still crying foul in your opinion, because a CEO with an ounce of business acumen decided to speak up about the disparity?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/a ... 6940398152
If the figures branded about in this article are accurate- shame on the SMA and the SANFL.
by kickinit » Tue Jun 03, 2014 6:29 pm
heater31 wrote:valleys07 wrote:So CCL- now that Adelaides beloved Mark Riccuito has come out in the below article, highlighting just how much both Port and the Crows are disadvantaged with the new move to Adelaide Oval, does this change your opinion? Or are Port still crying foul in your opinion, because a CEO with an ounce of business acumen decided to speak up about the disparity?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/a ... 6940398152
If the figures branded about in this article are accurate- shame on the SMA and the SANFL.
Again to both AFL clubs you agreed to this so either shut up or build your own stadium......
by Jase » Tue Jun 03, 2014 6:34 pm
kickinit wrote:heater31 wrote:valleys07 wrote:So CCL- now that Adelaides beloved Mark Riccuito has come out in the below article, highlighting just how much both Port and the Crows are disadvantaged with the new move to Adelaide Oval, does this change your opinion? Or are Port still crying foul in your opinion, because a CEO with an ounce of business acumen decided to speak up about the disparity?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/a ... 6940398152
If the figures branded about in this article are accurate- shame on the SMA and the SANFL.
Again to both AFL clubs you agreed to this so either shut up or build your own stadium......
Again to the SANFL you where given a seat on the SMA to produce a lean oval management, either stop lining your pockets or get out of the Government oval.
by gadj1976 » Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:48 pm
by kickinit » Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:10 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Look out, the SANFL clubs cash cow (the 50k each) might be in jeopardy too!
Seriously, I pi$$ myself at all this. I said to my mates this isn't going to be the financial saviour that everyone deemed it was going to be, before building commenced.
Now, they've moved in and everyone's up in arms. Where's the surprise? Oh, only the dipsh1ts that expected to get paid MORE for the new accommodation.
by wristwatcher » Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:21 pm
kickinit wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Look out, the SANFL clubs cash cow (the 50k each) might be in jeopardy too!
Seriously, I pi$$ myself at all this. I said to my mates this isn't going to be the financial saviour that everyone deemed it was going to be, before building commenced.
Now, they've moved in and everyone's up in arms. Where's the surprise? Oh, only the dipsh1ts that expected to get paid MORE for the new accommodation.
Yeh especially after the SANFL get caught stealing money from the building fund, then after the clubs signed on the dotted line blow their budget of $2million to $9million. The State Government were stupid for allowing the SANFL to have any part in the oval.
by Jim05 » Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:28 pm
kickinit wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Look out, the SANFL clubs cash cow (the 50k each) might be in jeopardy too!
Seriously, I pi$$ myself at all this. I said to my mates this isn't going to be the financial saviour that everyone deemed it was going to be, before building commenced.
Now, they've moved in and everyone's up in arms. Where's the surprise? Oh, only the dipsh1ts that expected to get paid MORE for the new accommodation.
Yeh especially after the SANFL get caught stealing money from the building fund, then after the clubs signed on the dotted line blow their budget of $2million to $9million. The State Government were stupid for allowing the SANFL to have any part in the oval.
by cracka » Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:30 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:52 pm
by kickinit » Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:55 pm
wristwatcher wrote:kickinit wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Look out, the SANFL clubs cash cow (the 50k each) might be in jeopardy too!
Seriously, I pi$$ myself at all this. I said to my mates this isn't going to be the financial saviour that everyone deemed it was going to be, before building commenced.
Now, they've moved in and everyone's up in arms. Where's the surprise? Oh, only the dipsh1ts that expected to get paid MORE for the new accommodation.
Yeh especially after the SANFL get caught stealing money from the building fund, then after the clubs signed on the dotted line blow their budget of $2million to $9million. The State Government were stupid for allowing the SANFL to have any part in the oval.
So the SANFL got caught stealing. Was anyone sacked? Was it one person or everyone that works for the company? What did they do with the money?
You seem to know a lot about the SANFL where do you get your information from??? I'm going with a bloke at the pub that knew a guy that heard it from his mates cousin.
by wristwatcher » Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:32 pm
kickinit wrote:wristwatcher wrote:kickinit wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Look out, the SANFL clubs cash cow (the 50k each) might be in jeopardy too!
Seriously, I pi$$ myself at all this. I said to my mates this isn't going to be the financial saviour that everyone deemed it was going to be, before building commenced.
Now, they've moved in and everyone's up in arms. Where's the surprise? Oh, only the dipsh1ts that expected to get paid MORE for the new accommodation.
Yeh especially after the SANFL get caught stealing money from the building fund, then after the clubs signed on the dotted line blow their budget of $2million to $9million. The State Government were stupid for allowing the SANFL to have any part in the oval.
So the SANFL got caught stealing. Was anyone sacked? Was it one person or everyone that works for the company? What did they do with the money?
You seem to know a lot about the SANFL where do you get your information from??? I'm going with a bloke at the pub that knew a guy that heard it from his mates cousin.
It was pretty well known when it happened
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6592730178
by whufc » Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:57 am
Jim05 wrote:kickinit wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Look out, the SANFL clubs cash cow (the 50k each) might be in jeopardy too!
Seriously, I pi$$ myself at all this. I said to my mates this isn't going to be the financial saviour that everyone deemed it was going to be, before building commenced.
Now, they've moved in and everyone's up in arms. Where's the surprise? Oh, only the dipsh1ts that expected to get paid MORE for the new accommodation.
Yeh especially after the SANFL get caught stealing money from the building fund, then after the clubs signed on the dotted line blow their budget of $2million to $9million. The State Government were stupid for allowing the SANFL to have any part in the oval.
Once againt they had no option in allowing them to have a say.
Without the SANFL willing to move the oval upgrade woyld never of happened
by stan » Fri Jun 06, 2014 2:14 pm
Jase wrote:kickinit wrote:heater31 wrote:valleys07 wrote:So CCL- now that Adelaides beloved Mark Riccuito has come out in the below article, highlighting just how much both Port and the Crows are disadvantaged with the new move to Adelaide Oval, does this change your opinion? Or are Port still crying foul in your opinion, because a CEO with an ounce of business acumen decided to speak up about the disparity?
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/a ... 6940398152
If the figures branded about in this article are accurate- shame on the SMA and the SANFL.
Again to both AFL clubs you agreed to this so either shut up or build your own stadium......
Again to the SANFL you where given a seat on the SMA to produce a lean oval management, either stop lining your pockets or get out of the Government oval.
Oh shit, here we go again...
Sent from my XT925 using Tapatalk
by valleys07 » Fri Jun 06, 2014 2:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |