Gillard or Rudd

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.

Gillard or Rudd

Poll ended at Sat Jul 06, 2013 5:26 pm

a. Gillard
9
36%
b. Rudd
16
64%
 
Total votes: 25

Bully
Coach
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:58 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 120 times
Contact:

Re: Gillard or Rudd

Post by Bully »

dedja wrote:
Q. wrote:Voting out Pyne appears to be my only motivation to vote :lol:


X 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000


Gillard's legacy will be The Poodle ...


but he finds his way in every time
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: Gillard or Rudd

Post by am Bays »

How good has the Killing Season been?

I love these political revisionist documentaries - Labor in Power, the Howard years etc.

This one has been the most gripping with respect to the political machinations and the fact that the two key protagonists have yet to move on - well one certainly hasn't.

The waves of hostility eminating from Rudd through my TV set - scare me!

Do you think they swap christmas cards and call the other on their respective birthdays?
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: Gillard or Rudd

Post by Q. »

Rudd is so butthurt.
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:49 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Re: Gillard or Rudd

Post by Hondo »

The Labor Party must look back on it all in light of that brilliant documentary and think "never again".

Surely there MUST have been a way of keeping Rudd (the person the electorate embraced as PM at the 2007 election) as PM but addressing his dysfunctional working practices internally behind closed doors.

Why didn't the caucus or cabinet ministers (are these the same group of people?) just thrash the whole thing out in the open and come up with some plan that did not involve changing actual PM in the way they did. Perhaps with some open discussion he could have been given some room to move and some conditions to meet. It all comes across like secret power games and the craziness is after making the mistake in 2010 they thought it could be fixed by basically repeating it 3 years later.

I think it was Anthony Albenese who put it best - the events of 2010 sealed the fate of not one but two PMs.

It's a gripping TV series.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
Posts: 14138
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:05 am
Team: Norwood
Been thanked: 686 times
Contact:

Re: Gillard or Rudd

Post by Gozu »

Hondo wrote:It's a gripping TV series.


I agree Hondo, I only watched the first episode of The Killing Season last night and will get around to watching the other two but it just makes the original decision to oust Rudd in June 2010 look even more pathetic. Clearly it was because Shorten and a few of the other powerbrokers felt Rudd wasn't rewarding them sufficiently enough. I really appreciate Greg Combet's honest opinions but from what I understand Lindsay Tanner refused to appear on it and if he had have that would've strengthened the legitimacy of the show.

What The Killing Season shows most IMO is how well the ABC do these political history docos The Howard Years and Labor In Power were pretty good too and we would be so much worse off if not for the ABC's existence.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests