Australian ODI Squad for NZ tour

[The Dark Knight]

6/171, 76 from 85 needed.

50/50 game.

[The Dark Knight]

Hastings gone, caught in the deep. 7/179, I don't see us winning this.

[norwood8]

This knock could define Wades career.

Plenty of controversy around the Marsh dismissal...

[Brodlach]

Hastings gone, caught in the deep. 7/179, I don't see us winning this.

Zampa said yesterday that he rates his own batting, time to deliver Zamps


*I rate his batting too FWIW

[The Dark Knight]

Come on Zampa, show the international stage you can bat

[RB]

The No Show!!!!
4/94

Are you surprised?

The BIGgest surprise is it was about 5 minutes after the BIG show was dismissed before Jim posted

Who is the Australian commentator ?

Allan Border

[The Dark Knight]

Hastings gone, caught in the deep. 7/179, I don't see us winning this.

Zampa said yesterday that he rates his own batting, time to deliver Zamps


*I rate his batting too FWIW

So do I, he's been a very good number 8 for SA. Hope he can show that right now.

[stampy]

why are there so many victorians in the shorter form of the game?, buncha fookn duds if ever i have seen any, apart from maybe hastings last match

[norwood8]

Wade must surely be banished from the national side, so out of form it's not funny.

[stampy]

Wade must surely be banished from the national side, so out of form it's not funny.

and he's a victorian!

[Brodlach]

That went well Zamps

[The Dark Knight]

Well we're f**fed

[Jim05]

Wade must surely be banished from the national side, so out of form it's not funny.

Agreed, don't know what he has ever done to deserve his gold pass

[Q.]

That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.

[bennymacca]

That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.

Looked pretty clearly out to me

[Jim05]

That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.

Looked pretty clearly out to me

Only after it was played on the big screen and the crowd cheered it which talked the ump into having a look at it. Terrible by the umpires, the bowler was back at his mark ready to bowl the next ball. So how long should you get to review a decision?

[Grahaml]

The Marsh one isn't about the decision, but the process. If the ICC don't quickly step in and say this was an error in protocol and clamp down on it then we'll have a potential mine field on our hands. I know in the NFL there's a clear difference between how quickly it takes for a replay of a close call to be shown based on whether the call went for or against the home side. I don't think we want to see that in cricket. Either everyone gets to see a replay first, or nobody does. Bet Warner wishes he'd got a replay of his LBW the other day to help with that decision.

[MJ_23]

That Marsh decision was abominable. Whatever happened to benefit of the doubt.

What doubt?

Clearly out.

[MJ_23]

The Marsh one isn't about the decision, but the process. If the ICC don't quickly step in and say this was an error in protocol and clamp down on it then we'll have a potential mine field on our hands. I know in the NFL there's a clear difference between how quickly it takes for a replay of a close call to be shown based on whether the call went for or against the home side. I don't think we want to see that in cricket. Either everyone gets to see a replay first, or nobody does. Bet Warner wishes he'd got a replay of his LBW the other day to help with that decision.

Goes both ways i bet Milne wished he got one as well.

I agree though i think it was poor umpiring but thats who this is on not the NZ players. Im glad the right decision was made though as well so i am sitting on the fence on this one.

[bennymacca]

Yep agree. Poor umpiring but the right decision was made in the end.