http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 84d15624bd
The best bit "The SANFL hopes to encourage players to take the game on through the corridor and lift scoring, with the AFL vowing to monitor the new rule."
Im guessing this is what we suspected, its AFL driven.
Rule Changes for 2016
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2936 times
- Been thanked: 4838 times
- Contact:
-
Bounce of the ball
- Reserves
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:10 am
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
- Contact:
- Magellan
- Coach
- Posts: 5981
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:04 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
- Has thanked: 756 times
- Been thanked: 1516 times
- Contact:
Re: Rule Changes for 2016
Dutchy wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/local-footy-sa/sanfl/central-district-coach-roy-laird-rubbishes-new-sanfl-outofbounds-rule/news-story/6c667770e9b9af83bfb78884d15624bd
The best bit "The SANFL hopes to encourage players to take the game on through the corridor and lift scoring, with the AFL vowing to monitor the new rule."
Im guessing this is what we suspected, its AFL driven.
Pity the AFL's not taking a vow of silence.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Rule Changes for 2016
Wedgie wrote:Roy's opinion might have been applicable last decade but he can't even coach the Dogs to a win over North in finals this decade.
Perhaps he could me more proactive and paint new lines at Elizabeth so there weren't so many straight line boundaries, when he's done that he can start on Woodville, Norwood, Glenelg, etc too.
Sorry, can you explain how any of this is relevant to the comments about rules.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51723
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Rule Changes for 2016
Dogwatcher wrote:Wedgie wrote:Roy's opinion might have been applicable last decade but he can't even coach the Dogs to a win over North in finals this decade.
Perhaps he could me more proactive and paint new lines at Elizabeth so there weren't so many straight line boundaries, when he's done that he can start on Woodville, Norwood, Glenelg, etc too.
Sorry, can you explain how any of this is relevant to the comments about rules.
Exactly!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51723
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Rule Changes for 2016
Actually now that I think about it, I wonder what difference in impact (if any) the new rule will make if grounds are true ovals with no straight lines as opposed to the grounds which have varying amount of straight lines marking boundaries.
I have no idea but might keep an eye out for it.
I have no idea but might keep an eye out for it.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
-
human_torpedo
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:47 am
- Team: Eagles
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 371 times
- Contact:
Re: Rule Changes for 2016
Funnily enough, I have heard good feedback from a few players about the rule, that it actually takes out the grey area of umpire interpretation for deliberate out of bounds. And generally the only time you will be punished is by a skill execution error, with the odd bit of bad luck.. So far they haven't had an issue with it
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Interceptor and 323 guests
