Lives Scores R4

[Wedgie]

Umps uses the "shepard out deliberately" interpretation in favour of the Dogs this time

Panthers by 26
26 mins

WTF? Have they brought in another new rule this week and not told anyone?

[johntheclaret]

Centrals coming home with the breeze

[whufc]

Umps uses the "shepard out deliberately" interpretation in favour of the Dogs this time

Panthers by 26
26 mins

When???

I'm here at we haven't got one from that interpretation

[johntheclaret]

Umps uses the "shepard out deliberately" interpretation in favour of the Dogs this time

Panthers by 26
26 mins

When???

I'm here at we haven't got one from that interpretation

Just listening to Life FM mate

[johntheclaret]

Umps uses the "shepard out deliberately" interpretation in favour of the Dogs this time

Panthers by 26
26 mins

WTF? Have they brought in another new rule this week and not told anyone?

Radio boys were very clear on it.
Panther player kicked the ball, which rolled out of bounds without being touched. So according to the new rule it should have been a free kick in to Centrals.
By the ump decided that the Central's player shepherded the ball out in order to get the free, when he could have picked it up. So the umps called a throw in instead.
In doing so, the ump must have applied a new interpretation to the rule as the ball definitely went out of bounds of the boot.

[johntheclaret]

Dogs gets the 1st
Panthers by 20
2 mins

[johntheclaret]

Panthers by 21
4 mins

[whufc]

And now if u soccer it out the out of bounds rule doesn't count!!!!!

[johntheclaret]

Having said that, maybe that is part of the rule all along. If the player deliberately shepards the ball out, the ump can call a throw in ??

Veide gives his 3rd 25 metre penalty.

[johntheclaret]

South player soccer's it out, for a throw in ?

Could this new rule be SANFL's own "off side"

[johntheclaret]

Hoskin
Panthers by 15
11 mins

[johntheclaret]

Panthers by 16
12 mins

[johntheclaret]

Irra
Panthers by 22
13 mins

[whufc]

Having said that, maybe that is part of the rule all along. If the player deliberately shepards the ball out, the ump can call a throw in ??

Veide gives his 3rd 25 metre penalty.

So instead of determining whether a player delibrately kicks it out they now have to determine whether a player lets it go out or no

What about soccering it out of bounds

[Wedgie]

Panthers home and deservedly so, woo-hoo!

[johntheclaret]

Overall gets 25 metre to the goal line
Panthers by 28
16 mins

[whufc]

Panthers home and deservedly so, woo-hoo!

U here wedge

[johntheclaret]

Having said that, maybe that is part of the rule all along. If the player deliberately shepards the ball out, the ump can call a throw in ??

Veide gives his 3rd 25 metre penalty.

So instead of determining whether a player delibrately kicks it out they now have to determine whether a player lets it go out or no

What about soccering it out of bounds

Apparently that doesn't count ?? I dunno

[johntheclaret]

Panthers by 27
19 mins

[whufc]

Having said that, maybe that is part of the rule all along. If the player deliberately shepards the ball out, the ump can call a throw in ??

Veide gives his 3rd 25 metre penalty.

So instead of determining whether a player delibrately kicks it out they now have to determine whether a player lets it go out or no

What about soccering it out of bounds

Apparently that doesn't count ?? I dunno

No one knows including the three umpires who have different interpretations of holding the ball and the out bounds

They haven't impacted the result but it's the worse umpired game I have ever seen

We literally have three different versions of the rules