JK wrote:Expecting the Roos to roll the Blues handsomely this weekend .. No slight on Carlton, they'll be undermanned and it's harder for them to cover with where their list is at, than many other clubs. Think Scott wouldn't have been too impressed with what the Roos dished up last weekend either.
the roos are certainly the top undefeated side with far more many agraders in their side... not that i couldnt name many but there must be a few?
the carlton boys are expelling high endeavour to work hard and continue to work hard throughout every minute of the game and with 4 wins under their belt they are footballers who come with belief, despite beating the very very lowly likes such as port
did they saints expose a weakness in the roos, or were the roos just lazy.
nonetheless north will wanna be switched on this week the blues are not that flaking ailing dead fish theyve been known to be, and could get quite as close as saints did
#dreaming
And Essingtendumbscum too. We live in eternal hope!
Casboult's return is even more surprising after the Blues had ruled him out for up to two months with a hairline fracture in his left leg just 11 days ago.
marbles wrote: Casboult's return is even more surprising after the Blues had ruled him out for up to two months with a hairline fracture in his left leg just 11 days ago.
Phht seems a bit soon/stupid
Crazy really. Obviously the diagnosis was wrong in the beginning if he is able to play.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
marbles wrote: Casboult's return is even more surprising after the Blues had ruled him out for up to two months with a hairline fracture in his left leg just 11 days ago.
Phht seems a bit soon/stupid
Crazy really. Obviously the diagnosis was wrong in the beginning if he is able to play.
marbles wrote: Casboult's return is even more surprising after the Blues had ruled him out for up to two months with a hairline fracture in his left leg just 11 days ago.
Phht seems a bit soon/stupid
Crazy really. Obviously the diagnosis was wrong in the beginning if he is able to play.
they're both zero chance of playing
Waste of time doing this. Match Committee will play 900 talls regardless.
Personally I still can't see Cas playing. Last week we had one tall forward in Jones and he wasn't our worst. So why would you drop Jones for Cas? Especially against Taylor Lonergan Henderson? I would not be surprised if both were late withdrawals.
gadj1976 wrote:Personally I still can't see Cas playing. Last week we had one tall forward in Jones and he wasn't our worst. So why would you drop Jones for Cas? Especially against Taylor Lonergan Henderson? I would not be surprised if both were late withdrawals.
Maybe going in smaller up forward looking for a obvious miss match?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Yeah baby!!! I was out all day with the kids so didn't see any of the game. Very pleasing to get another win. Who were the best players? I'm assuming all played well like all of our other wins this year.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
amber_fluid wrote:Yeah baby!!! I was out all day with the kids so didn't see any of the game. Very pleasing to get another win. Who were the best players? I'm assuming all played well like all of our other wins this year.
amber_fluid wrote:Yeah baby!!! I was out all day with the kids so didn't see any of the game. Very pleasing to get another win. Who were the best players? I'm assuming all played well like all of our other wins this year.
Gibbs best by a fair bit. Thought Docherty was very good and probably Rowe's best game for awhile
amber_fluid wrote:Yeah baby!!! I was out all day with the kids so didn't see any of the game. Very pleasing to get another win. Who were the best players? I'm assuming all played well like all of our other wins this year.
Gibbs best on by a mile.
That's 3 or 4 BOGS this year for him I reckon. He would be an out and out star in a very good side like Hawthorn.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
bennymacca wrote:He would be an out and out star if he had produced this consistently over the past 5 years!
Finally showing what he is capable of
Yeah but playing in a bottom side is a lot harder to produce then playing in a really good side. He is a lot more consistent now though than say 3 years ago
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
bennymacca wrote:He would be an out and out star if he had produced this consistently over the past 5 years!
Finally showing what he is capable of
Yeah but playing in a bottom side is a lot harder to produce then playing in a really good side. He is a lot more consistent now though than say 3 years ago
Chicken and the egg theory though isn't it? Maybe if Gibbs and the other dozen top 10 picks Carlton have had over the years had been consistant they wouldn't of been a poor side.
bennymacca wrote:He would be an out and out star if he had produced this consistently over the past 5 years!
Finally showing what he is capable of
Yeah but playing in a bottom side is a lot harder to produce then playing in a really good side. He is a lot more consistent now though than say 3 years ago
Chicken and the egg theory though isn't it? Maybe if Gibbs and the other dozen top 10 picks Carlton have had over the years had been consistant they wouldn't of been a poor side.
Unfortunately for these high draft picks there weren't any real leaders other than Judd to show them the way.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
