North Melbourne

Corona Man · Post by **Corona Man** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:08 pm

Do the Kanga's actually have 50 K :-??

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:10 pm

Spargo wrote:What f#cking joke.
Rumoured that a businessman who's been involved with the club over 40 years offered to pay whatever the fine would be yesterday.

What about today now that he knows the price

That is a ridiculous fine...... Punishment does not fit the crime!
Half that would have been more than enough.

Mr Beefy · Post by **Mr Beefy** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:10 pm

Corona Man wrote:Do the Kanga's actually have 50 K

They'll just ask the AFL to get it out the future fund

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:10 pm

stan wrote:
Booney wrote:
Trader wrote:Club fined $50k
Scott $30k.

Cop that!

Ouch...!

Fairly harsh really. He made a bad mistake in a presso. He apologized for it. Was it worth 30k? Not so sure.

Precedent was set when Hird was fined $20k in 2004 for a similar offence

Trader · Post by **Trader** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:11 pm

Correct Jim. Hird's 20 meant Scott had to be minimum 25.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:24 pm

Trader wrote:Correct Jim. Hird's 20 meant Scott had to be minimum 25.

Yep, inflation, $30k looks about right.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:26 pm

Booney wrote:
Trader wrote:Correct Jim. Hird's 20 meant Scott had to be minimum 25.

Yep, inflation, $30k looks about right.

What was Essendon fined at the time?

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:32 pm

Spargo wrote:
Booney wrote:
Trader wrote:Correct Jim. Hird's 20 meant Scott had to be minimum 25.

Yep, inflation, $30k looks about right.

What was Essendon fined at the time?

$5000

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2004-04-15/h ... lur/171240

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:35 pm

How's the inflation there?
Laughable.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:40 pm

Spargo wrote:
Booney wrote:
Trader wrote:Correct Jim. Hird's 20 meant Scott had to be minimum 25.

Yep, inflation, $30k looks about right.

What was Essendon fined at the time?

$5k but the difference was the club didn't know Hird was going to say what he didn't sanction it.
Apparently North got the $50k fine because Geoff Walsh relayed the story to Scott so in affect the club instigated it

Post by **Dutchy** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 7:53 pm

Corona Man wrote:Do the Kanga's actually have 50 K

7 out last 8 years of profit since JB took over, actually one of the stronger clubs now financially with bugger all debt.

As for the fine, bit over the top...but he will pay it and get a $30k pay rise next year

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Tue Jun 21, 2016 8:26 pm

Over the top??? Pleeze you called the umps a bunch of cheats.....
Should've been double!! Lol

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:19 am

I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:22 am

bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

North will not make top 4, they have West Coast ( A ), Port, Collingwood and St Kilda under the roof, then finish with the glorious run of Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Sydney and GWS. They'll win 2 or 3 of the last 8. 4 absolute tops.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:29 am

bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

Lol - when were you smashed for saying that?
They're still equal second Benny.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:29 am

Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

North will not make top 4, they have West Coast ( A ), Port, Collingwood and St Kilda under the roof, then finish with the glorious run of Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Sydney and GWS. They'll win 2 or 3 of the last 8. 4 absolute tops.

We'll see.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:38 am

Spargo wrote:
Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

North will not make top 4, they have West Coast ( A ), Port, Collingwood and St Kilda under the roof, then finish with the glorious run of Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Sydney and GWS. They'll win 2 or 3 of the last 8. 4 absolute tops.

We'll see.

Which ones are you confident of winning?

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:51 am

Booney wrote:
Spargo wrote:
Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

North will not make top 4, they have West Coast ( A ), Port, Collingwood and St Kilda under the roof, then finish with the glorious run of Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Sydney and GWS. They'll win 2 or 3 of the last 8. 4 absolute tops.

We'll see.

Which ones are you confident of winning?

I honestly don't mark off future games as W's/L's & whilst ladder predictors are fun, they're simply guess work.
Sundays game v West Coast is massive, should get Wells, Waite & possibly Anderson back.
Quietly confident this week.

Post by **Dutchy** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 12:47 pm

Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

North will not make top 4, they have West Coast ( A ), Port, Collingwood and St Kilda under the roof, then finish with the glorious run of Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Sydney and GWS. They'll win 2 or 3 of the last 8. 4 absolute tops.

Good chance against WCE and will start favorites in the next 3 games and possibly the bulldogs game, would expect a minimum of 3 wins in the next 5 with a chance of winning them all.

Waite, Wells, Anderson all to come back this week and Higgins, Jacobs not far away will assist big time.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Mon Jul 04, 2016 2:40 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
bennymacca wrote:I don't wanna say I told you so, but I was smashed on here for even suggesting north might fall out of the top 4, and they are now 7th...

Having said that, it's going to be super tight from here on. Quite a few games that are in effect worth 8 points.

The makeup of the eight is very interesting

North will not make top 4, they have West Coast ( A ), Port, Collingwood and St Kilda under the roof, then finish with the glorious run of Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Sydney and GWS. They'll win 2 or 3 of the last 8. 4 absolute tops.

Good chance against WCE and will start favorites in the next 3 games and possibly the bulldogs game, would expect a minimum of 3 wins in the next 5 with a chance of winning them all.

Waite, Wells, Anderson all to come back this week and Higgins, Jacobs not far away will assist big time.

Eagles have a 4-5 goal umpiring advantage before a ball is bounced especially if Margetts is doing them again. North will need to be good to get over the line

North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Re: North Melbourne 2016

Who is online