by Dogs72 » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:28 pm
by bennymacca » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:39 pm
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:01 pm
bennymacca wrote:are you seriously arguing with the comments of an adelaide now article?
You may as well go argue with the youtube commenters
by Dogs72 » Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:25 pm
bennymacca wrote:are you seriously arguing with the comments of an adelaide now article?
You may as well go argue with the youtube commenters
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:35 am
by Dogs72 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 12:48 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Did your reply stay on the comments section Dogs72???
The SANFL wouldn't be happy if it did.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:05 pm
by tipper » Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:11 pm
Dogs72 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Did your reply stay on the comments section Dogs72???
The SANFL wouldn't be happy if it did.
Yes both still there.
I didn't even get to some of it, the change in Tripodis vote, the availability of Seedsman (that wouldn't have happened for WWT or an SANFL club that had the week off), his dismissiveness and questioning of Roy speaking out, whose missed one finals series since 2003, and coached 7 premierships etc. etc.
Do you think they wont be happy because it's inaccurate? Should I expect a fine?
by UK Fan » Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:29 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by holden78 » Sat Sep 10, 2016 10:58 am
by therisingblues » Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:03 am
by daysofourlives » Sat Sep 10, 2016 11:05 am
therisingblues wrote:Van Berlo on MMM this morning.
KG asks him about professionals v amateurs regarding the reserves debate, he basically answers Yeah, but ON THE FLIP SIDE .. Then starts rattling off all these benefits for the Crows; really just 8 different ways of saying it's beneficial having the squad playing together. Not just for the Crows... But for Port as well!
Wow, the league is saved! Crows and Port are happy.
by LPH » Sat Sep 10, 2016 10:24 pm
by Aerie » Sun Sep 11, 2016 9:40 am
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:44 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Grenville » Sun Sep 11, 2016 5:52 pm
Wedgie wrote:So if AFL rookies get paid a minimum of 55K per year plus match payments and others are on a minimum100K per year plus match payments does anyone want to estimate what the Crows team today was on compared to South's 350K?
That's not taking into account coaches and trainers.
by csbowes » Sun Sep 11, 2016 6:56 pm
Grenville wrote:Wedgie wrote:So if AFL rookies get paid a minimum of 55K per year plus match payments and others are on a minimum100K per year plus match payments does anyone want to estimate what the Crows team today was on compared to South's 350K?
That's not taking into account coaches and trainers.
Stop being so negative, the comp is in a far better place than it would be if they hadn't come in at all.
by Magellan » Sun Sep 11, 2016 7:02 pm
csbowes wrote:Grenville wrote:Wedgie wrote:So if AFL rookies get paid a minimum of 55K per year plus match payments and others are on a minimum100K per year plus match payments does anyone want to estimate what the Crows team today was on compared to South's 350K?
That's not taking into account coaches and trainers.
Stop being so negative, the comp is in a far better place than it would be if they hadn't come in at all.
Evidence?
by Ian » Sun Sep 11, 2016 7:06 pm
Grenville wrote:Wedgie wrote:So if AFL rookies get paid a minimum of 55K per year plus match payments and others are on a minimum100K per year plus match payments does anyone want to estimate what the Crows team today was on compared to South's 350K?
That's not taking into account coaches and trainers.
Stop being so negative, the comp is in a far better place than it would be if they hadn't come in at all.
by Magellan » Sun Sep 11, 2016 7:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |