Zartan wrote:Word on the street is Red card will he downgraded to yellow today.. Salis North with another great escape!
This has been confirmed after a meeting with the umps and the CEO.
Salisbury North and Wally just don't know how lucky they are.
Both remain with one life left.
Anyone still want to suggest that the league are out to get them?
Probably not FC. If I were SN I'd be exploring the idea of forfeiting all games for the rest of the year to sort their shit out. Cop the fine rather than be banished into oblivion forever. Fine friggn line they are treading.
Zartan wrote:Word on the street is Red card will he downgraded to yellow today.. Salis North with another great escape!
This has been confirmed after a meeting with the umps and the CEO.
Salisbury North and Wally just don't know how lucky they are.
Both remain with one life left.
Anyone still want to suggest that the league are out to get them?
Lucky? Care to explain? How is it luck that it was found that it was deemed to be worthy of a yellow rather than red? The way the "tribunal" went about it last Wednesday the only thing lucky is that they still have their jobs.
Zartan wrote:Word on the street is Red card will he downgraded to yellow today.. Salis North with another great escape!
This has been confirmed after a meeting with the umps and the CEO.
Salisbury North and Wally just don't know how lucky they are.
Both remain with one life left.
Anyone still want to suggest that the league are out to get them?
Lucky? Care to explain? How is it luck that it was found that it was deemed to be worthy of a yellow rather than red? The way the "tribunal" went about it last Wednesday the only thing lucky is that they still have their jobs.
If your view of last weeks tribunal of Drainer and his five game suspension is the same of view as the Club, then no wonder Salisbury North are in the position they are and why things will never improve there. Justified suspension, got what he deserved, and well done by the League for stamping out actions like that!
Zartan wrote:Word on the street is Red card will he downgraded to yellow today.. Salis North with another great escape!
This has been confirmed after a meeting with the umps and the CEO.
Salisbury North and Wally just don't know how lucky they are.
Both remain with one life left.
Anyone still want to suggest that the league are out to get them?
Lucky? Care to explain? How is it luck that it was found that it was deemed to be worthy of a yellow rather than red? The way the "tribunal" went about it last Wednesday the only thing lucky is that they still have their jobs.
Lucky because it was originally a red - and Marc is sitting on 11 games - league could've let the red stand and left Salisbury North possibly suspended for the rest of the year and Coxy would never play footy again.
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
Your previous comment seemed to be having a go at the Tribunal for the 5 game suspension given to the Salisbury North player. If that's what you were implying, you were way off the mark, they got it spot on.
Zartan wrote:Word on the street is Red card will he downgraded to yellow today.. Salis North with another great escape!
This has been confirmed after a meeting with the umps and the CEO.
Salisbury North and Wally just don't know how lucky they are.
Both remain with one life left.
Anyone still want to suggest that the league are out to get them?
Lucky? Care to explain? How is it luck that it was found that it was deemed to be worthy of a yellow rather than red? The way the "tribunal" went about it last Wednesday the only thing lucky is that they still have their jobs.
Lucky because it was originally a red - and Marc is sitting on 11 games - league could've let the red stand and left Salisbury North possibly suspended for the rest of the year and Coxy would never play footy again.
Your previous comment seemed to be having a go at the Tribunal for the 5 game suspension given to the Salisbury North player. If that's what you were implying, you were way off the mark, they got it spot on.
I'm confused... Drainer was the last red card SN had. I thought that got overturned as SN were appealing. My mistake.
Zartan wrote:Word on the street is Red card will he downgraded to yellow today.. Salis North with another great escape!
This has been confirmed after a meeting with the umps and the CEO.
Salisbury North and Wally just don't know how lucky they are.
Both remain with one life left.
Anyone still want to suggest that the league are out to get them?
Lucky? Care to explain? How is it luck that it was found that it was deemed to be worthy of a yellow rather than red? The way the "tribunal" went about it last Wednesday the only thing lucky is that they still have their jobs.
Lucky because it was originally a red - and Marc is sitting on 11 games - league could've let the red stand and left Salisbury North possibly suspended for the rest of the year and Coxy would never play footy again.
card was never given. Going too be very interesting of the outcome of SN appeal on last weeks suspension.
Your previous comment seemed to be having a go at the Tribunal for the 5 game suspension given to the Salisbury North player. If that's what you were implying, you were way off the mark, they got it spot on.
I'm confused... Drainer was the last red card SN had. I thought that got overturned as SN were appealing. My mistake.
Did not know they were appealing the Drainer decision, that will be interesting! Video was pretty damning what I saw, so don't fancy their chances.
Your previous comment seemed to be having a go at the Tribunal for the 5 game suspension given to the Salisbury North player. If that's what you were implying, you were way off the mark, they got it spot on.
I'm confused... Drainer was the last red card SN had. I thought that got overturned as SN were appealing. My mistake.
Did not know they were appealing the Drainer decision, that will be interesting! Video was pretty damning what I saw, so don't fancy their chances.
Heard he had his suspension reduced tonight from 5 matches to 4? That was a waste of everyone's time tonight then. Under the Leagues rulings and guidelines with the actual report, he had to get 4 or 5 games, so appeals tribunal had only two options, keep at 5 games or reduce to 4, looks like they took the latter option.
footy trawler wrote:TTG 3 losses in a row - explanation?
They have lost 4 in a row actually. They have been missing a few players, but their execution in games has been poor. Way too many turnovers. They need to get their mojo back quickly or they could end up missing finals.
footy trawler wrote:TTG 3 losses in a row - explanation?
They have lost 4 in a row actually. They have been missing a few players, but their execution in games has been poor. Way too many turnovers. They need to get their mojo back quickly or they could end up missing finals.
Also a comp where on any given day there's not a huge gap between 1st and 7th.
In the case of Smithfield re-offending I think that has more to do with the coincidence of their win-loss ratio than just been complacent because there not on the AAA anymore
