2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:08 pm

Spargo wrote:He got off

Well if you make the GF your guys know what they need to to.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:09 pm

stan wrote:Wtf?

You’re seriously not surprised are you?

Dogs64 · Post by **Dogs64** » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:11 pm

SANFL should appeal, bring in Keith Martyn to prove the sun doesn't set behind the goals.

PatowalongaPirate · Post by **PatowalongaPirate** » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:13 pm

He pleaded guilty to 2 charges of Striking in the same game and got off. But according to power fans on Twitter the SANFL are out to get them.

spell_check · Post by **spell_check** » Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:38 pm

The sun seems to cause that same problem every match he plays in, even when looking down.

Alex · Post by **Alex** » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:15 pm

Sanity has prevailed. Now let's see if for once Port doesn't lose the free kick count 2 -1 in the GF. No ridiculous theatrics like the SANFL pulled in 2017 to push Sturt over the line please.

TDJ44 · Post by **TDJ44** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:22 am

PatowalongaPirate wrote:He pleaded guilty to 2 charges of Striking in the same game and got off. But according to power fans on Twitter the SANFL are out to get them.

Bloody sun.
Must affect power supporters also.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 5:02 am

Booney wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:
cennals05 wrote:So Port are questioning the validity of the injury report because Curran played on after the hits. Have they not heard of delayed concussion? A precedent has already been set by the SANFL for this. A few years ago Presbury got suspended for a dangerous tackle on a Norwood player and missed the Preliminary final the next week. The Norwood player played out that game as well. Not sure why it should be any different for the Port players.

Plenty of precedent this year, all the talk of medical report is garbage. Round 13 Frampton got 3 downgraded to 2 (didn't appeal) other round examples Ben Davis 3 to 2, Aidyn Johnson 2 to 1 (didn't appeal), just to name a few where the players they were found guilty of hitting played on. The last round Jydon Neagle from CD got 3 to 2 for a high bump on Ladhams, he played on and played the next week. Frampton and Johnson have been reported for high contact, either they did or didn't. Frampton's other report in the game for striking was to the body and therefore got a fine (lucky he didn't get reported a third time, I think that can mean a send off).

Didn't get reported once on the day, the Match Review Panel cited him, so no can do there.

I don't expect Johnson to get off and wouldn't have appealed that one.

The Frampton one, worth appealing to play in a GF ( being the reason it's been appealed as opposed to the others you noted above ) and I think they might be successful as it was in play.

And.....

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:20 am

Surely the SANFL is the biggest laughing stock of a competition in the world.

I reckon it has the A-League covered which is saying something.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:34 am

The what league?

JK · Post by JK » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:41 am

Does the SANFL still have the send off rule? If so Port could also be thankful the reports weren’t made on the day

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:43 am

Booney wrote:The what league?

S.A.N.F.L

There about as irrelevant as one another.

Dogs64 · Post by **Dogs64** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:07 am

Dutchy wrote:

In the footage it looks like he strikes him whilst in the shade of the light tower.

LMA · Post by **LMA** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:23 am

Dogs64 wrote:
Dutchy wrote:

In the footage it looks like he strikes him whilst in the shade of the light tower.

I've seen those moon landing conspiracies too :lol:

Dogs64 · Post by **Dogs64** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:54 am

LMA wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:
Dutchy wrote:

In the footage it looks like he strikes him whilst in the shade of the light tower.

I've seen those moon landing conspiracies too

https://sanfl.com.au/league/news/sanfl- ... -findings/

LMA · Post by **LMA** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:03 am

Port need to move on from this now and concentrate on the GF. Frampton needs to reward his good luck with a cracker of a game.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:03 am

This forum would be dead without the Port Adelaide talk. :lol:

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:04 am

LMA wrote:Port need to move on from this now and concentrate on the GF. Frampton needs to reward his good luck with a cracker of a game.

Agreed, he was average in the semi, needs to lift next week.

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:09 am

Booney wrote:
LMA wrote:Port need to move on from this now and concentrate on the GF. Frampton needs to reward his good luck with a cracker of a game.

Agreed, he was average in the semi, needs to lift next week.

Already thinking about that 5 year deal the Crows have on the table for him

2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Re: 2019 2nd Semi Final - Glenelg v Powerserves

Who is online