Jim05 wrote:16 minute quarters, why even bother.
Still think it’s a bad look for these guys to play but I’ll still tune in
16 minutes will fix it
This is most left field decision I’ve ever seen!!
by whufc » Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:26 pm
Jim05 wrote:16 minute quarters, why even bother.
Still think it’s a bad look for these guys to play but I’ll still tune in
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:27 pm
by Armchair expert » Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:29 pm
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:47 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Channel 7 very very happy
by jackpot jim » Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:50 pm
by amber_fluid » Wed Mar 18, 2020 8:01 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Quite simply the AFL is an UTTER F******G JOKE of an organization
by LMA » Wed Mar 18, 2020 8:13 pm
by amber_fluid » Wed Mar 18, 2020 8:13 pm
LMA wrote:If the NRL weren't playing the AFL would of suspended days ago. They don't want to lose viewership to Rugby.
by LMA » Wed Mar 18, 2020 8:16 pm
amber_fluid wrote:jackpot jim wrote:Quite simply the AFL is an UTTER F******G JOKE of an organization
It’s ridiculous they are going ahead with it.
They think they are immune too it.
Obviously money still talks.
by LMA » Wed Mar 18, 2020 8:18 pm
amber_fluid wrote:LMA wrote:If the NRL weren't playing the AFL would of suspended days ago. They don't want to lose viewership to Rugby.
Who’s going to watch that shit?
by tigerpie » Wed Mar 18, 2020 9:59 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 18, 2020 10:05 pm
Preparing for delays later in the season where they will cram games in and teams will be playing every 3-4 days potentiallytigerpie wrote:What's the purpose of shortened quarters?
Less sweat?
by Trader » Wed Mar 18, 2020 10:15 pm
by JK » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:12 am
by amber_fluid » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:38 am
JK wrote:Riewoldt said last night the 16 min quarters equate to %20 less playing time and coincidentally the AFL want the players to take a %20 cut
by Jim05 » Thu Mar 19, 2020 7:59 am
The AFL and clubs made a rod for their own back when they started stuffing around with the TPP and offering front or back ended contracts, deferred payments etc.amber_fluid wrote:JK wrote:Riewoldt said last night the 16 min quarters equate to %20 less playing time and coincidentally the AFL want the players to take a %20 cut
Small businesses are taking a hit maybe the players should too.
At least the senior players on good coin anyway.
$600k a year down to $480k won’t send them broke.
by daysofourlives » Thu Mar 19, 2020 8:14 am
Jim05 wrote:The AFL and clubs made a rod for their own back when they started stuffing around with the TPP and offering front or back ended contracts, deferred payments etc.amber_fluid wrote:JK wrote:Riewoldt said last night the 16 min quarters equate to %20 less playing time and coincidentally the AFL want the players to take a %20 cut
Small businesses are taking a hit maybe the players should too.
At least the senior players on good coin anyway.
$600k a year down to $480k won’t send them broke.
I can understand people asking for a 20% cut across the board but with so many different contract structures it’s near on impossible. If I’m in the final year of a back ended contract there is no way I’m giving up 20% of my pay
by JK » Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:24 am
Jim05 wrote:The AFL and clubs made a rod for their own back when they started stuffing around with the TPP and offering front or back ended contracts, deferred payments etc.amber_fluid wrote:JK wrote:Riewoldt said last night the 16 min quarters equate to %20 less playing time and coincidentally the AFL want the players to take a %20 cut
Small businesses are taking a hit maybe the players should too.
At least the senior players on good coin anyway.
$600k a year down to $480k won’t send them broke.
I can understand people asking for a 20% cut across the board but with so many different contract structures it’s near on impossible. If I’m in the final year of a back ended contract there is no way I’m giving up 20% of my pay
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:26 am
amber_fluid wrote:LMA wrote:If the NRL weren't playing the AFL would of suspended days ago. They don't want to lose viewership to Rugby.
Who’s going to watch that shit?
by amber_fluid » Thu Mar 19, 2020 9:35 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:amber_fluid wrote:LMA wrote:If the NRL weren't playing the AFL would of suspended days ago. They don't want to lose viewership to Rugby.
Who’s going to watch that shit?
Is that the game where you run forward with the ball but then throw it backwards?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |