by Alex » Mon May 04, 2020 7:26 pm
by Jim05 » Mon May 04, 2020 7:37 pm
Port can’t afford either model currently.Alex wrote:Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc
by Brett » Mon May 04, 2020 9:07 pm
Alex wrote:Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc
by stan » Tue May 05, 2020 7:36 am
Bang on and exactly what I have been saying, no $$$ means no team. The AFL are going to find it hard to keep themselves afloat and the scrubber teams without also looking after reserve teams.Jim05 wrote:Port can’t afford either model currently.Alex wrote:Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc
They are requiring AFL bail out money to stay afloat.
by sib » Tue May 05, 2020 1:59 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Tue May 05, 2020 3:04 pm
by Alex » Tue May 05, 2020 3:14 pm
sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.
by amber_fluid » Tue May 05, 2020 3:42 pm
Alex wrote:sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.
That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power
by Alex » Tue May 05, 2020 7:32 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Alex wrote:sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.
That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power
They should never of changed it originally.
Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.
by amber_fluid » Tue May 05, 2020 7:45 pm
Alex wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Alex wrote:sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.
That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power
They should never of changed it originally.
Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.
Rubbish
by Jim05 » Tue May 05, 2020 7:51 pm
Not rubbish.Alex wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Alex wrote:sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.
That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power
They should never of changed it originally.
Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.
Rubbish
by topshelf » Tue May 05, 2020 8:25 pm
by Brett » Tue May 05, 2020 10:13 pm
topshelf wrote:Sounding more likely they are gone, although the crows apparently remain confident of having a side. Can't have one of them in and not the other, one out both out thanks. They are talking like it would be just for this season. That would be an absolute joke if we allow them back in after, now is the time to fix the decision made the first time.
by Alex » Tue May 05, 2020 10:37 pm
by Alex » Tue May 05, 2020 10:46 pm
by amber_fluid » Wed May 06, 2020 9:34 am
Alex wrote:No I'm not happy with the power reserves playing for Port Adelaide but when you love something that has become damaged or ill then I'd prefer to live in hope of repairing it rather than just give up.
by Brett » Wed May 06, 2020 7:39 pm
by DOC » Wed May 06, 2020 7:59 pm
Brett wrote:With the AFL now in Ports control, I would like to know if the AFL deliberately not allow a Crows reserves team in the SANFL? It may turn out that neither franchises aren't part of it but I would not write off a 9 team competition next year. It changes quickly.
It will make it very interesting as I cant see an AFL reserves competition.
by amber_fluid » Wed May 06, 2020 8:03 pm
DOC wrote:Brett wrote:With the AFL now in Ports control, I would like to know if the AFL deliberately not allow a Crows reserves team in the SANFL? It may turn out that neither franchises aren't part of it but I would not write off a 9 team competition next year. It changes quickly.
It will make it very interesting as I cant see an AFL reserves competition.
That is news, Booney and LMA will be more smug.
by fish » Thu May 07, 2020 12:45 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |