normstwin wrote:jims out with Two Wells
Cheers for that norm, will have to get in touch with him

by azzaisbest » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:19 pm
normstwin wrote:jims out with Two Wells
by catchit » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:19 pm
norm11 wrote:catchit wrote:azzaisbest wrote:azzaisbest wrote:Is there a chance you wont be playing in the para districts comp next season??
meaning retirement is one of my options..
Retirement or the chance you might front up for another comp
hope valley with jimmy mccarthy to return there with u??
by leftarmoffie » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:21 pm
by saveyourlegs » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:22 pm
by azzaisbest » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:24 pm
normstwin wrote:No s***t. I am changing my number
by catchit » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:26 pm
norm11 wrote:catchit wrote:norm11 wrote:I know noone thinks we can beat Sal West with our form at the moment but we were not meant to win two years ago either
i think you wre playing better cricket back then.. would you agree??
Maybe a little. We have a better side now though
by catchit » Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:29 pm
saveyourlegs wrote:Thats ok catchit, all in the memory bank
by cantbatcantbowl » Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:29 pm
affup wrote:is kevin thomas playing finals? i am pretty sure he had only played 3 games? did they get a permitt?
by Grahaml » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:47 pm
by Well run » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:50 am
Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
by affup » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:11 am
Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
by catchit » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:46 am
by Well run » Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:55 am
catchit wrote:3 plus 1 is 4? Isnt that the same number of premierships you have lost in a row graham? Do you really think we would not check all of that out.. Come on mate give us some credit..
by creekers » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:15 am
by Well run » Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:45 pm
creekers wrote:that makes no sense mp man
the bloke grahaml had a crack at tw and now they can't reply and put him in his place
its called cockyness???
i think they just being confident as we are at creeks
you gotta have some confidence and self belief, if you don't your gonna lose
the two teams who talked it up last week on here won from what i believe!
sandys vs tw grand final bring it on!!
by billybob » Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:59 pm
Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
by affup » Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:13 pm
billybob wrote:Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
Thats interesting because in the bylaws of the pdca it states that if a game is lost due to weather it cannot be counted towards finals qualification, so has the pdca bent the rules for TW, i wouldnt be surprised if it was yes as this assoc is going down the drain ATM. might be worth looking into.
by Honda07 » Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:19 pm
billybob wrote:Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
Thats interesting because in the bylaws of the pdca it states that if a game is lost due to weather it cannot be counted towards finals qualification, so has the pdca bent the rules for TW, i wouldnt be surprised if it was yes as this assoc is going down the drain ATM. might be worth looking into.
by Well run » Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:37 pm
affup wrote:billybob wrote:Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
Thats interesting because in the bylaws of the pdca it states that if a game is lost due to weather it cannot be counted towards finals qualification, so has the pdca bent the rules for TW, i wouldnt be surprised if it was yes as this assoc is going down the drain ATM. might be worth looking into.
Here ill explain it to you slowly so you can understand.
In round 6 OTH v TW was the only game called off due to the ground being under water and of course match reports still need to submitted to the powers that be because 3 points are awarded to each team not like a day over 40 degrees were no points are awarded and match reports are not required. You can look into it all you want but he is playing whether you like it or not. The powers that be have given the all clear.![]()
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:40 pm
Iloveshanebrown wrote:billybob wrote:Grahaml wrote:According to the web site he only played the 3. I'm fairly sure they changed the qualification to 4 games not too long ago. Be embarrassing for the Wells to have a key player they're expecting to play finals not qualified because they either didn't know the rules or couldn't count properly!
Thats interesting because in the bylaws of the pdca it states that if a game is lost due to weather it cannot be counted towards finals qualification, so has the pdca bent the rules for TW, i wouldnt be surprised if it was yes as this assoc is going down the drain ATM. might be worth looking into.
There are certainly people on the assoc comm their for their own agenda and not for the good of the assoc. We had a guy who would have qualified in our E grade finals if there hadnt been any heat but also he did us a favour one week and filled in at late notice in our B grade cos someone didnt rock up, hence didnt play E grade that week so it means he has played 50% of his games in a higher grade. It has to be less then 50%. This guy is in his 40's - he is no longer a gun. Permit refused for finals. Apparently a close vote. Obviously no common sense on the comm either. Kev Tomas game when washed out should count becasue everyone else played that round. Maybe they showed some common sense then.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |