by rodney fox » Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:54 pm
by Slots It Through » Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:40 pm
by scottroo » Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:45 pm
by Terms And Conditions » Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:47 pm
white line fever wrote:Terms And Conditions wrote:SFL Side
F Golding Pollard D Reavill
HF Beeching Ramsay N Bayly
C M Reavill B Bayly Bachmann
HB McKenzie McKeough Bradshaw
FB Tedmanson Smith Schimanski
Foll Gulihas Johnstone Vick
INT Tucker, Couch, Ridley, Cornish, Farrier, Broadbent etc etc?????......
Havent seen a few others play as yet
In Because he is just a glove rarely if ever beaten on most opponents probally one that no one would agree with.
thats a great effort there TAC. we would win for sure with that squad. i mean a half back flanker going to beeching after ramsey got the CHB.
by White Line Fever » Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:53 pm
scottroo wrote:the sfl could put a team out there, there 100% full strength side and they would still lose to saafl 23s
by Esteban Vihaio » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:01 pm
white line fever wrote:scottroo wrote:the sfl could put a team out there, there 100% full strength side and they would still lose to saafl 23s
How many representative players do Colonel Light Gardens FC have in this years SAAFL U/23 side?
by brother noompsy 11 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:19 pm
by scottroo » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:49 pm
by bandar » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:49 pm
scottroo wrote:the sfl could put a team out there, there 100% full strength side and they would still lose to saafl 23s
by Esteban Vihaio » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:33 pm
scottroo wrote:WLF, clg dont have any reps in the team...although i reckon harvey could put a case forward
as for clg would not win a game in the SFL i think we would comfortably beat hackham
we also played aldinga in a 4 x15 min quarter trial this year and won by 20 goals!
i reckon we would push flagstaff hill aswell
by Dazza44 » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:49 am
scottroo wrote:WLF, clg dont have any reps in the team...although i reckon harvey could put a case forward
as for clg would not win a game in the SFL i think we would comfortably beat hackham
we also played aldinga in a 4 x15 min quarter trial this year and won by 20 goals!
i reckon we would push flagstaff hill aswell
by Super Fred » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:31 am
scottroo wrote:WLF, clg dont have any reps in the team...although i reckon harvey could put a case forward
as for clg would not win a game in the SFL i think we would comfortably beat hackham
we also played aldinga in a 4 x15 min quarter trial this year and won by 20 goals!
i reckon we would push flagstaff hill aswell
by rodney fox » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:16 am
scottroo wrote:WLF, clg dont have any reps in the team...although i reckon harvey could put a case forward
as for clg would not win a game in the SFL i think we would comfortably beat hackham
we also played aldinga in a 4 x15 min quarter trial this year and won by 20 goals!
i reckon we would push flagstaff hill aswell
by DILLIGAF » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:21 am
by DILLIGAF » Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:22 am
brother noompsy 11 wrote:totally agree play against the gsfl then the winner can play the saafl next year like they play the state games in the sanfl.but y the fu** would u play it at south though play it locally like porties or christies get that country feel about it just imagine ....sitn on the hill esky full of vb cans and watchn some bloody good footy.ahahaha more like jacks n coke .
by Jono » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:21 am
by soup_nazi » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:18 pm
by Jono » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:19 pm
by asert » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:22 pm
by soup_nazi » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:37 pm
Football
Other Footy Leagues
SFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

