This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:50 am

Quichey wrote:I reckon Andy Krak is gonna buuuuuuuuuuuurn a lot of coaches.

Or, because I won't pick him, he'll become a premium keeper

I'll have 'B' thanks Eddie.

regards,

REB

Hondo · Post by **Hondo** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:35 pm

What do we think about Nathan Ablett?

Q. · Post by Q. » Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:38 pm

Hondo wrote:What do we think about Nathan Ablett?

Do you think he'll get games?

IMO, better rookie options up forward, not just from GC, who also boast the likes of Prestia and Matera.

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:48 pm

Hondo wrote:What do we think about Nathan Ablett?

He's a lazy 5hite.

regards,

REB

Hondo · Post by **Hondo** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:06 pm

I see N Ablett as a regular player but one who may not score that great.

I have him and Krakouer battling for the one spot

I worry that there just won't be the room for Krak in their midfield and despite all the promise he could burn us as Quichey suggests

Too early really to tell without the NAB Cup to help us

valleys07 · Post by **valleys07** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:12 pm

Hondo wrote:I worry that there just won't be the room for Krak in their midfield and despite all the promise he could burn us as Quichey suggests

Quichey was referring to andy krak hondo. I dont think any coach with half an understanding of SC will pick up Nathan Krak until he proves otherwise....ordinary at absolute best.

Hondo · Post by **Hondo** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:18 pm

valleys07 wrote:
Hondo wrote:I worry that there just won't be the room for Krak in their midfield and despite all the promise he could burn us as Quichey suggests

Quichey was referring to andy krak hondo. I dont think any coach with half an understanding of SC will pick up Nathan Krak until he proves otherwise....ordinary at absolute best.

I agree on Nathan but I did mean Andrew Krakouer

With all Collingwood's midfield options I worry we'll have an opportunist forward on our hands which means inconsistent scoring

valleys07 · Post by **valleys07** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:19 pm

Hondo wrote:I agree on Nathan but I did mean Andrew Krakouer

With all Collingwood's midfield options I worry we'll have an opportunist forward on our hands which means inconsistent scoring

After re-reading your post i stand corrected, play on!

OnSong · Post by **OnSong** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:46 pm

Hondo wrote:
valleys07 wrote:
Hondo wrote:I worry that there just won't be the room for Krak in their midfield and despite all the promise he could burn us as Quichey suggests

Quichey was referring to andy krak hondo. I dont think any coach with half an understanding of SC will pick up Nathan Krak until he proves otherwise....ordinary at absolute best.

I agree on Nathan but I did mean Andrew Krakouer

With all Collingwood's midfield options I worry we'll have an opportunist forward on our hands which means inconsistent scoring

Dunno about that. Krak has been DOMINATING the midfield. You would have to be a moron to leave him in a forward pocket all year.
He might just become one of those many rotations. But yes, concern of another Leon Davis is certainly evident.

Hondo · Post by **Hondo** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 1:57 pm

Fair enough

It does sound like A Krakouer > N Ablett

OnSong · Post by **OnSong** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:01 pm

Anyone going back for more J-pod this year?

valleys07 · Post by **valleys07** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:01 pm

Hondo wrote:Fair enough

It does sound like A Krakouer > N Ablett

He did kick 4 goals in their most recent internal trial....

CoverKing · Post by **CoverKing** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:46 pm

Krakeour IMO will play most of the year as an opportunist forward. Wont score consistently, but will score better than Ablett IMO. Ablett will play, but i would be reluctant in picking him

Rik E Boy · Post by **Rik E Boy** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:55 pm

OnSong wrote:Anyone going back for more J-pod this year?

I reckon it's a big risk to go for a venue dependent player in a year where there are byes. He hasn't really proven himself against the top sides either.

regards,

REB

Ingall · Post by **Ingall** » Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:56 pm

OnSong wrote:Anyone going back for more J-pod this year?

Only if I can get him at the price I paid for him last year :-)

CoverKing · Post by **CoverKing** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:42 pm

Will they have that loophole with captaincy in round 1 this year? because of the thursday night game?

Q. · Post by Q. » Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:59 pm

CoverKing wrote:Will they have that loophole with captaincy in round 1 this year? because of the thursday night game?

AFAIK that loophole will be in play again this year.

CoverKing · Post by **CoverKing** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:05 pm

so if you have Judd for example, you pick him as captain, if he as a shocker you can change it?

Ingall · Post by **Ingall** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:09 pm

No, you pick Judd as Vice Captain and if he has a shocker you pick someone else as Captain

CoverKing · Post by **CoverKing** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:11 pm

Ingall wrote:No, you pick Judd as Vice Captain and if he has a shocker you pick someone else as Captain

Ah, so if i say go Swan captain, Judd Vice. Judd score 150 and im happy with that, i would than change Swans captaincy to a non started who will score 0.

Yeah?

This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Re: This player That Player 2011 Discussion

Who is online