Drugs, umps and other ammo's news

[whufc]

I think its a great decision by the SAAFL, this wasn't an isolated incident from this club as their rap sheet shows.

The Amateur Soccer League did this a couple of years ago to a couple of clubs who continued to have serious issues and the league has never been better!!

Its a courageous decision but a right on imho.

[Yank Man]

I think its a great decision by the SAAFL, this wasn't an isolated incident from this club as their rap sheet shows.

The Amateur Soccer League did this a couple of years ago to a couple of clubs who continued to have serious issues and the league has never been better!!

Its a courageous decision but a right on imho.

Yeah they probably got it right, me for one just feel for the really good people at Rosie's, especially Mr Beefy, I've seen first hand how hard they all work to keep it together. Unfortunately sometimes you just have to clear the bad ones out but I don't think anyone at Rosewater could have seen this one coming.

[Tony Clifton]

Was anyone there?

What incident(s) led up to the umpire hit?

Was it a rough game? Were other players sent off?

The player had been sent off - why? Presumably he then disagreed with the decision. Verbal abuse too? Did the incident occur on the field or over near the interchange race?

Is he a highly regarded umpire or is there a history between him and the player/club?

[Big Red Nose]

Sad news for Rosies who have been a tough rival for us over the years but totally agree that the league needs to take a tough stance on this type of thing and send a message to all clubs to take responsibility for the people that wear their Guernsey. I'm sure Rosies will be back, they're a proud club.

[carey]

Was anyone there?

What incident(s) led up to the umpire hit?

Was it a rough game? Were other players sent off?

The player had been sent off - why? Presumably he then disagreed with the decision. Verbal abuse too? Did the incident occur on the field or over near the interchange race?

Is he a highly regarded umpire or is there a history between him and the player/club?

Whilst I get your point, No answer to any of the above questions should condone the outcome of what happened to the umpire. Unfortunately

[Big Red Nose]

Was anyone there?

What incident(s) led up to the umpire hit?

Was it a rough game? Were other players sent off?

The player had been sent off - why? Presumably he then disagreed with the decision. Verbal abuse too? Did the incident occur on the field or over near the interchange race?

Is he a highly regarded umpire or is there a history between him and the player/club?

Whilst I get your point, No answer to any of the above questions should condone the outcome of what happened to the umpire. Unfortunately

[Big Red Nose]

Agreed Carey

[Footy Chick]

Was anyone there?

What incident(s) led up to the umpire hit?

Was it a rough game? Were other players sent off?

The player had been sent off - why? Presumably he then disagreed with the decision. Verbal abuse too? Did the incident occur on the field or over near the interchange race?

Is he a highly regarded umpire or is there a history between him and the player/club?

Tony (and anyone else I guess), what do you make of the fact that it happened 5 mins into the first quarter?

[bloodypassit]

I think its a great decision by the SAAFL, this wasn't an isolated incident from this club as their rap sheet shows.

The Amateur Soccer League did this a couple of years ago to a couple of clubs who continued to have serious issues and the league has never been better!!

Its a courageous decision but a right on imho.

Bollocks !!!!!
You do realise that the SAASL have allowed the same teams in under different names

You do relies the same teams have committed similar offences this year

[Lame Choice]

Was anyone there?

What incident(s) led up to the umpire hit?

Was it a rough game? Were other players sent off?

The player had been sent off - why? Presumably he then disagreed with the decision. Verbal abuse too? Did the incident occur on the field or over near the interchange race?

Is he a highly regarded umpire or is there a history between him and the player/club?

Tony (and anyone else I guess), what do you make of the fact that it happened 5 mins into the first quarter?

Making and breaking our own rules FC?

1) The specifics of the actual incidents will not be discussed

2) We will also beat with a banstick, anyone who wasn't witness to the event speculating, or reporting any hearsay of the actual incident.

[FOURTH ESTATE]

Confirmed!!!! Player suspended for 20 years

Which means he can have no official involvement or hold any position in any football club Australia wide

[Footy Chick]

No rules being broken,the verdict is in Lame Choice.

Despite this, i didnt' ask for specifics, I just asked what people made of the timing.

[jo172]

Good. Umpires are sacrosanct and need to know they're completely protected

[Lame Choice]

No rules being broken,the verdict is in Lame Choice.

Despite this, i didnt' ask for specifics, I just asked what people made of the timing.

As a moderator, you may want to disseminate the actual tribunal findings before adding part facts. A speculative comment including "5 mins in" is what you had your stick out about - right?

[Bluedemon]

Confirmed!!!! Player suspended for 20 years

Which means he can have no official involvement or hold any position in any football club Australia wide

Wow, that is huge.

[whufc]

I think its a great decision by the SAAFL, this wasn't an isolated incident from this club as their rap sheet shows.

The Amateur Soccer League did this a couple of years ago to a couple of clubs who continued to have serious issues and the league has never been better!!

Its a courageous decision but a right on imho.

Bollocks !!!!!
You do realise that the SAASL have allowed the same teams in under different names

You do relies the same teams have committed similar offences this year

Its a more complex situation in the SAASL because of barriers with things such as ID's, use of correct names etc but as a rule each time a team has tried to come back they have had less and less issues and the trouble makers have been quicked out easier.

If the offense im thinking of from this year is the one you mean it was from a team that players from the same nationality but were not even of the same religion as the team that was expelled.

Having played against many of the teams that have been kicked out the SAASL is a billion times safer league than it was 3 years ago when they were having crowd violence and on field violence on a weekly basis.

[heater31]

No rules being broken,the verdict is in Lame Choice.

Despite this, i didnt' ask for specifics, I just asked what people made of the timing.

As a moderator, you may want to disseminate the actual tribunal findings before adding part facts. A speculative comment including "5 mins in" is what you had your stick out about - right?

Got an issue with a post? Use the report function with a description of your objections.

[Footy Chick]

You're right, Id only just got the news as I posted.

Apologies.

[Lame Choice]

You're right, Id only just got the news as I posted.

Apologies.

No worries, might want to settle heater though..
Btw, is there a statement of sorts yet?

[Footy Chick]

You're right, Id only just got the news as I posted.

Apologies.

No worries, might want to settle heater though..
Btw, is there a statement of sorts yet?

I'd say everyone at HQ has had a fairly long day as it is, I wouldn't expect anything official until tomorrow