Booney wrote:Hey, more than happy to discuss previous or future seasons with those who are willing to discuss them rationally. Not just trolling for the sake of it.
Come on mate, one only has to look at the kicking you give in particular Adelaide, North & Richmond in their threads to appreciate the hypocrisy here.
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide are set to announce a new Major Partner today, joining Renault as the two major sponsors of the PAFC.
South China Airlines are the most likely, however my mail suggests it may be a more global brand looking to further develop it's ties to the Chinese market.
China Southern already sponsor Melbourne don't they?
They do, that's why I think my mail might be on the mark.
Didn't they already announce this? Thought it was Parmalat (Oak Milk)? Or is this another new one?
Booney wrote:Hey, more than happy to discuss previous or future seasons with those who are willing to discuss them rationally. Not just trolling for the sake of it.
Come on mate, one only has to look at the kicking you give in particular Adelaide, North & Richmond in their threads to appreciate the hypocrisy here.
Oh no, I'm being called a hypocrite, how will I sleep?
I join in discussion mate, I don't dig up old articles simply to troll, difference?
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide are set to announce a new Major Partner today, joining Renault as the two major sponsors of the PAFC.
South China Airlines are the most likely, however my mail suggests it may be a more global brand looking to further develop it's ties to the Chinese market.
China Southern already sponsor Melbourne don't they?
They do, that's why I think my mail might be on the mark.
Didn't they already announce this? Thought it was Parmalat (Oak Milk)? Or is this another new one?
Booney wrote:Hey, more than happy to discuss previous or future seasons with those who are willing to discuss them rationally. Not just trolling for the sake of it.
Come on mate, one only has to look at the kicking you give in particular Adelaide, North & Richmond in their threads to appreciate the hypocrisy here.
Oh no, I'm being called a hypocrite, how will I sleep?
I join in discussion mate, I don't dig up old articles simply to troll, difference?
So joining a discussion to troll is different? Got it
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Booney wrote:The only reason the two admin have posted in here recently has been to cause a stir, nothing more.
Anyway, we digress. Plus, I've got a long night laying awake ahead.
I agree with Boon here I think he has a point. Dutchy is a well known shit stirrer of Port and as a mod should handle himself better.
Wedgie on the other hand is at least creative. Might be a new bobbie of his since he has a bt more time on his hands now, when hes not a the pub of course
I can do both. At the pub now! [emoji38]
Lol christ I was only kidding about the pub bit but hey seems like your living the dream now.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Wedgie wrote:Did a bit of investigating and 119 is actually China's Emergency Phone Number! True story!
What you posted was written in Korean.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail 1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
I wanted to ask what the feeling was about Port's chances next season, given that for the past two years they were touted as being finals certainties and flag possibilities. Looks as though we might need to tip toe around the issue so hope the discussion doesn't upset anyone. Seriously though, I would say Port are better placed for an assault on the finals next year, with Ryder being available and all. I reckon the absence of the media talking up their chances would do them a favour also. Are the Port folk confident, or just quietly?
Hey, more than happy to discuss previous or future seasons with those who are willing to discuss them rationally. Not just trolling for the sake of it.
Ryder is an extremely important inclusion for us, so too will Trengove being back in his rightful place at CHB as well as Hombsch and Jonas as the 2nd/3rd talls in the back half who both missed much of 2016. Two pretty key areas we were well and truly undermanned in last year. Quietly confident of challenging for the bottom half of the 8 as I think North will free fall and West Coast will slip a little and while Melbourne are on the improve, they're still Melbourne and I think we're better placed than Collingwood to win an extra 2-3 games and get to the 13-15 win mark.
Agree with most of that. I wonder what the media will make of it. I quietly backed against port with confidence this season. I would assume the Ryder factor would be enough to get you in the 8 next year though.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail 1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
therisingblues wrote:What you posted was written in Korean.
They have the same number too! 119 is rife!
No one does 119 as good as Port though. Booney, apologies for trolling and bringing up the past all in the one sentence.
I understand mate, admin are making a mockery of the thread so please yourself.
Yep, it's like when someone says, "I'm not a troll, BUT...." If you have to say "but", you are a troll, no exceptions!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail 1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
Dutchy wrote:Interesting positioning of Port taking a gambling sponsorship when everyone else is distancing themselves away from gambling companies sponsorships.
***Topical discussion point only***
U Bet have been on board for 2 years, this is a further 2 year agreement.
Dutchy wrote:Interesting positioning of Port taking a gambling sponsorship when everyone else is distancing themselves away from gambling companies sponsorships.
***Topical discussion point only***
U Bet have been on board for 2 years, this is a further 2 year agreement.
Again, other clubs are refusing to take sponsorship $ from gambling companies, LUXbet at Richmond as an example.
Im not saying its right or wrong, just compared to its peers its a different approach
Dutchy wrote:Interesting positioning of Port taking a gambling sponsorship when everyone else is distancing themselves away from gambling companies sponsorships.
***Topical discussion point only***
U Bet have been on board for 2 years, this is a further 2 year agreement.
Again, other clubs are refusing to take sponsorship $ from gambling companies, LUXbet at Richmond as an example.
Im not saying its right or wrong, just compared to its peers its a different approach
Well we cant bitch and moan when they lose money and then bag them for getting sponsorshio from a betting agency.
Crickey they need the cash as much as anyone.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards