SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Post Reply

Grand Finalists for 2011

Adelaide Lutheran
9
15%
Brahma Lodge
5
8%
Hope Valley
12
20%
Ingle Farm
1
2%
Kenilworth
3
5%
Lockleys
1
2%
Plympton
15
25%
Trinity OS
4
7%
North Haven
8
13%
Woodville South
3
5%
 
Total votes: 61

woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by woodublieve12 »

Jugs wrote:
watchingfromafar wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:haha! ok mate you believe that... :roll:

to awnser your second question, it certainly isn't you....


hey mate just worked out who you are by reading your post. just want to state just ignore jugs he has no idea what he is talking about.

i watched a few c grade games last season and you made the right decision when you selected your team. also im have spoken to several people down the club and they feel you did make the best decision. not to say it wasn't easy.

im tired of reading bout this topic. so jugs as WUB12 wrote get over it and move on.


Wood u believe anything you've just said? He may be a Premiership Coach but he's certainly not 'Mr.Popular' at PFC. Is that why he's not there anymore?


im not there any more because of my missus work!!!! wouldnt care less what anyone thinks of me especially pathetic, childish, ignorant pieces of sh*t like yourself!!! pm me beause id be happy to have a chat if you wish..... but by guessing the certan person you are i wouldnt expect much of a intellectual conversation!!! by the way everyone knows who am, why dont you be a man and share who you are instead of giving cheap pops behind a keyboard!!!
"Be curious, not judgmental""
watchingfromafar
Mini-League
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:09 pm
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by watchingfromafar »

Jugs wrote:
watchingfromafar wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:haha! ok mate you believe that... :roll:

to awnser your second question, it certainly isn't you....


hey mate just worked out who you are by reading your post. just want to state just ignore jugs he has no idea what he is talking about.

i watched a few c grade games last season and you made the right decision when you selected your team. also im have spoken to several people down the club and they feel you did make the best decision. not to say it wasn't easy.

im tired of reading bout this topic. so jugs as WUB12 wrote get over it and move on.


Wood u believe anything you've just said? He may be a Premiership Coach but he's certainly not 'Mr.Popular' at PFC. Is that why he's not there anymore?


yeah i would believe it...
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by woodublieve12 »

do nth haven have the same coach???
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12447 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by The Dark Knight »

woodublieve12 wrote:do nth haven have the same coach???

Yes WUB12, Pricey (if that's who you mean) will most likely coach our C grade again this season.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by woodublieve12 »

The Dark Knight wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:do nth haven have the same coach???

Yes WUB12, Pricey (if that's who you mean) will most likely coach our C grade again this season.


cool, good bloke.. some of the best sprays at his players i have heard in my life came from him.. all the best this season, when we played you guys you had alot of potential... all the best for the coming season...
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12447 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by The Dark Knight »

woodublieve12 wrote:
The Dark Knight wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:do nth haven have the same coach???

Yes WUB12, Pricey (if that's who you mean) will most likely coach our C grade again this season.


cool, good bloke.. some of the best sprays at his players i have heard in my life came from him.. all the best this season, when we played you guys you had alot of potential... all the best for the coming season...

Yeah thanks WUB12, good luck to your boys too. Pricey's a good bloke, most of the time. ;) He does give out some great sprays, I've only ever watched them, some have been very entertaining.

With the pre season we've had and with the increased numbers throughout it with a fair amount of C graders amongst them, I think our C Grade will be fitter and more competitive than last season. Spots are up for grabs in all of our grades, including the C's.
Demon Juke
League - Best 21
Posts: 1970
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:22 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 70 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by Demon Juke »

The Dark Knight wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
The Dark Knight wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:do nth haven have the same coach???

Yes WUB12, Pricey (if that's who you mean) will most likely coach our C grade again this season.


cool, good bloke.. some of the best sprays at his players i have heard in my life came from him.. all the best this season, when we played you guys you had alot of potential... all the best for the coming season...

Yeah thanks WUB12, good luck to your boys too. Pricey's a good bloke, most of the time. ;) He does give out some great sprays, I've only ever watched them, some have been very entertaining.

With the pre season we've had and with the increased numbers throughout it with a fair amount of C graders amongst them, I think our C Grade will be fitter and more competitive than last season. Spots are up for grabs in all of our grades, including the C's.

As long as he no's you only can have 18 on the field at one time! :)
Shirtfront
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1139
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:47 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Broadview
Location: Right up the middle
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by Shirtfront »

Was going to jump on HV for Premiers but i can't select them in the poll. Have you got a team SD?
User avatar
The Big T
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hope Valley
Location: In the Back Room
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by The Big T »

Shirtfront wrote:Was going to jump on HV for Premiers but i can't select them in the poll. Have you got a team SD?


Yep we do have a C's Shirtfront
Shirtfront
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1139
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:47 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Broadview
Location: Right up the middle
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by Shirtfront »

The Big T wrote:
Shirtfront wrote:Was going to jump on HV for Premiers but i can't select them in the poll. Have you got a team SD?


Yep we do have a C's Shirtfront


Thats what i thought i had been reading................ obviously no chance for Premiers though, can't select it.
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:14 am
Team: West Adelaide
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Hope Valley
Location: The Doghouse
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 373 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by S Demon »

Yeah, we've got a team shirtfront! The poll jst needs to be adjusted. The C grade comps have been changed so many times, it would be hard for the mods to keep up.

I'm sure FC will sort it pretty quickly.

Plympton and Luthies the teams to beat, shirtfront...
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
Posts: 27021
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:14 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has thanked: 1794 times
Been thanked: 2249 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by Footy Chick »

S Demon wrote:Yeah, we've got a team shirtfront! The poll jst needs to be adjusted. The C grade comps have been changed so many times, it would be hard for the mods to keep up.

I'm sure FC will sort it pretty quickly.

Plympton and Luthies the teams to beat, shirtfront...


Yeah I'll get around to it eventually :lol:
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
User avatar
Bluedemon
Coach
Posts: 5120
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:00 pm
Team: Sturt
Location: Goodwood
Has thanked: 154 times
Been thanked: 113 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by Bluedemon »

Footy Chick wrote:
S Demon wrote:Yeah, we've got a team shirtfront! The poll jst needs to be adjusted. The C grade comps have been changed so many times, it would be hard for the mods to keep up.

I'm sure FC will sort it pretty quickly.

Plympton and Luthies the teams to beat, shirtfront...


Yeah I'll get around to it eventually :lol:


:-"
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:14 am
Team: West Adelaide
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Hope Valley
Location: The Doghouse
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 373 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by S Demon »

Does someone have a valid reason as to why North Haven don't want to play triple headers - Dark Knight, Boosh? Is it player availability?

3 clubs in particular fought very hard to keep C5 in line with the Div 5 teams to keep triple headers alive and kicking. It seems a shame for North Haven to ruin it for the other 6 clubs who all want triple headers

Trinity, Ingle Farm and Kenilworth have all been flexible in changing the draw to suit themselves and the other clubs...
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by LMA »

S Demon wrote:Does someone have a valid reason as to why North Haven don't want to play triple headers - Dark Knight, Boosh? Is it player availability?

3 clubs in particular fought very hard to keep C5 in line with the Div 5 teams to keep triple headers alive and kicking. It seems a shame for North Haven to ruin it for the other 6 clubs who all want triple headers

Trinity, Ingle Farm and Kenilworth have all been flexible in changing the draw to suit themselves and the other clubs...


Ruin it ? very selfish point of view, they are not compulsory and if your a C grader you generally get the ass end of the timeslots
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by woodublieve12 »

LMA wrote:
S Demon wrote:Does someone have a valid reason as to why North Haven don't want to play triple headers - Dark Knight, Boosh? Is it player availability?

3 clubs in particular fought very hard to keep C5 in line with the Div 5 teams to keep triple headers alive and kicking. It seems a shame for North Haven to ruin it for the other 6 clubs who all want triple headers

Trinity, Ingle Farm and Kenilworth have all been flexible in changing the draw to suit themselves and the other clubs...


Ruin it ? very selfish point of view, they are not compulsory and if your a C grader you generally get the ass end of the timeslots


not selfish at all... what i dont understand is its a win win for the club!!! they werent keen last season either... time slots much better to get players then when you play at the normal time..
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
Boosh
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1244
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:12 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: North Haven
Has thanked: 256 times
Been thanked: 192 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by Boosh »

S Demon wrote:Does someone have a valid reason as to why North Haven don't want to play triple headers - Dark Knight, Boosh? Is it player availability?

3 clubs in particular fought very hard to keep C5 in line with the Div 5 teams to keep triple headers alive and kicking. It seems a shame for North Haven to ruin it for the other 6 clubs who all want triple headers

Trinity, Ingle Farm and Kenilworth have all been flexible in changing the draw to suit themselves and the other clubs...


Im not a 100% certain but I believe it is because they struggled to get players for the earlier time slots and the coach doesn't want to be ringing around at 9am trying to get a team together.

If you need another contact at the club PM me
I have a problem. It's to do with the little man, the squashed-in French man, the naked little squashed up hairy boy! You know! With the hand feet
*I apologise to Hope Valley people in advance, no offence intended
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:14 am
Team: West Adelaide
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Hope Valley
Location: The Doghouse
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 373 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by S Demon »

Boosh wrote:
S Demon wrote:Does someone have a valid reason as to why North Haven don't want to play triple headers - Dark Knight, Boosh? Is it player availability?

3 clubs in particular fought very hard to keep C5 in line with the Div 5 teams to keep triple headers alive and kicking. It seems a shame for North Haven to ruin it for the other 6 clubs who all want triple headers

Trinity, Ingle Farm and Kenilworth have all been flexible in changing the draw to suit themselves and the other clubs...


Im not a 100% certain but I believe it is because they struggled to get players for the earlier time slots and the coach doesn't want to be ringing around at 9am trying to get a team together.

If you need another contact at the club PM me


I understand that, but i don't think your coach was keen to play after the A grade either? I think we have offered Friday night at Hope Valley and after the A grade at your ground, but it may well be 2.15pm at Hope Valley...
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4616
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:14 am
Team: West Adelaide
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Hope Valley
Location: The Doghouse
Has thanked: 314 times
Been thanked: 373 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by S Demon »

LMA wrote:
S Demon wrote:Does someone have a valid reason as to why North Haven don't want to play triple headers - Dark Knight, Boosh? Is it player availability?

3 clubs in particular fought very hard to keep C5 in line with the Div 5 teams to keep triple headers alive and kicking. It seems a shame for North Haven to ruin it for the other 6 clubs who all want triple headers

Trinity, Ingle Farm and Kenilworth have all been flexible in changing the draw to suit themselves and the other clubs...


Ruin it ? very selfish point of view, they are not compulsory and if your a C grader you generally get the ass end of the timeslots


If you think that worrying about 6 clubs because of what 1 club wants to do is selfish, you made need a dictionary to look up the meaning of selfish...

We do get the ass end of the timeslots for triple headers, but as pay off to early starts, we also get all our umpires, trainers, water boys, goal umpires, boundary umpires, players and supporters, all at the one ground
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: SAAFL Div C5 (2011)

Post by LMA »

Some folk just don't like them, to say 1 club is ruining it for everyone else is an ignorant statement, they have exercised their democratic right not to play them, get over it you'll still have 10 trebles throughout the year.
I for one don't like them as a player due to the fact that unless you play A's your playing at a timeslot whicch possibly has more of an impact on work and family committments. Call me old fashioned but what is wrong with 12.15 and 2.15 on a Saturday afternoon
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests