VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by Cohiba »

morell wrote:
Cohiba wrote:
Our two M & M,s ..... reminds you bit about the real pair of M & M's.....polar opposites....


You get in the bowl.


Rather have a bowl.... :)
Jetters
Reserves
Posts: 805
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:01 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Unley
Has thanked: 106 times
Been thanked: 119 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by Jetters »

This is the dumbest shit ever. What is been proposed is a minor change, how can so much dibble be written about it?

Marbles your arguments blow and you are the worst salesman of all time. Although in principle your idea is fine.

People from low grade clubs are so fricken sensitive.


It would be best for a number of reasons if it was A v A and C v C.

Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS. When you think of a different solution, go for it.

Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by marbles »

Jetters wrote:This is the dumbest shit ever. What is been proposed is a minor change, how can so much dibble be written about it?

Marbles your arguments blow and you are the worst salesman of all time. Although in principle your idea is fine.

People from low grade clubs are so fricken sensitive.


It would be best for a number of reasons if it was A v A and C v C.

Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS. When you think of a different solution, go for it.

Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.


thankyou jetters u big equilibrium :)

ok put it this way, div 7 next year is so far looking like...

Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?

is there away these battlers can play each other 3 times or 4 times or sum shit?

and lets not write off kilburn from this pack either, which will push another side up to div 6

oh and Blackwood C's are somewhere too? cgrade super league??

i honestly doubt uni would wanna stay in this comp :D
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by morell »

Jetters wrote:Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS.
:YMAPPLAUSE: :YMAPPLAUSE: :YMAPPLAUSE: :YMAPPLAUSE:

Mind you I don't know why I am applauding. This point has been made countless times by countless people and it still escapes marbles.

Jetters wrote:Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.
NO I DIDNT YOU NUMPTIES! Hahah this is hilarious. You have bought into marbles false strawman Jetters. For **** sake I even clarified this not a page ago:

morell wrote:I am not saying any club should be put in front of any other club.

I am saying any clubs survival should be put in front of a C Grade sides right to choose what division they play in and who they play against.

Stop. Dribbling. Shit.


See if you can spot the difference.
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Has thanked: 1248 times
Been thanked: 750 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by jo172 »

marbles wrote:
Jetters wrote:This is the dumbest shit ever. What is been proposed is a minor change, how can so much dibble be written about it?

Marbles your arguments blow and you are the worst salesman of all time. Although in principle your idea is fine.

People from low grade clubs are so fricken sensitive.


It would be best for a number of reasons if it was A v A and C v C.

Marbles you have the issue that this causes an unworkable number of clubs. You either have to have byes, invite new clubs to jump divs or leave clubs stranded. NO ONE LIKES THESE SOLUTIONS. When you think of a different solution, go for it.

Morell, on one hand you say you guys are really C graders and so in reality it is appropriate to play against big club's C grades. But on the other, you say you are actually an A grade side and therefore your existence should be prioritised over the big club's C grades. You can't have your cake and eat it too. A player is a player is a player no matter what club/what standard, you all pay the same subs to the League, the league cares about rate of participation. You all get treated equally as a mere number.


thankyou jetters u big equilibrium :)

ok put it this way, div 7 next year is so far looking like...

Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?

is there away these battlers can play each other 3 times or 4 times or sum shit?

and lets not write off kilburn from this pack either, which will push another side up to div 6

oh and Blackwood C's are somewhere too? cgrade super league??

i honestly doubt uni would wanna stay in this comp :D


Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by marbles »

jo172 wrote:
Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?


No mate. Henley C & D are next in line to the div 7 virus. if we are there next year we'll be forfeiting too just like the clubs the virus has already eaten into

Im saying if all C grades went to a super c-grade league, excluding Adelaide Uni, div 7 could possibly look like this...

Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?

i kind of doubt that Adelaide Uni will want to stay here amongst these minions. wouldnt you agree??
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by morell »

See you next year marbles. :)
tomo
Under 16s
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 7:43 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Kenilworth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 14 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by tomo »

Gee, Henley's D grade must really hate being undefeated for the last two years!!!!
Div 7 is way too hard for them!!!!!
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
Posts: 2079
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Has thanked: 154 times
Been thanked: 289 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by Look Good In Leather »

marbles wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?


No mate. Henley C & D are next in line to the div 7 virus. if we are there next year we'll be forfeiting too just like the clubs the virus has already eaten into

Im saying if all C grades went to a super c-grade league, excluding Adelaide Uni, div 7 could possibly look like this...

Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?

i kind of doubt that Adelaide Uni will want to stay here amongst these minions. wouldnt you agree??


Maybe it is time for Uni to split up into two A-grade clubs?
I know it has been considered in the past - they have done it with Monash in VIC
X Runna
Reserves
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:47 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by X Runna »

tomo wrote:Gee, Henley's D grade must really hate being undefeated for the last two years!!!!
Div 7 is way too hard for them!!!!!


Not quite correct - they were smashed at the Farm last season. HOWEVER - in principle you are correct. If as has been quoted "they are only there for a kick and a catch" why don't they bring some credibility to themselves, their club AND the competition by playing C Grade, because they are clearly Henley's 3rd best side.

IF, and only IF, Henley showed some metal and enforced this, marbles' ridiculous super C Grade competition may have half a modicim of merit.
finn
League - Best 21
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:51 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide University
Location: adelaide
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 22 times
Contact:

Re: VERSION 2: 7 Pure A-Grade Divisions

Post by finn »

Look Good In Leather wrote:
marbles wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Are you saying that if Henley are put in Div 7 next year they will pull their C and D Grades?


No mate. Henley C & D are next in line to the div 7 virus. if we are there next year we'll be forfeiting too just like the clubs the virus has already eaten into

Im saying if all C grades went to a super c-grade league, excluding Adelaide Uni, div 7 could possibly look like this...

Mitchell Park (1 team)
Angle Vale
North Pines
Flinders Uni (1 team)
Wingfield (1 team)
Adelaide Uni Cs to stay?

i kind of doubt that Adelaide Uni will want to stay here amongst these minions. wouldnt you agree??


Maybe it is time for Uni to split up into two A-grade clubs?
I know it has been considered in the past - they have done it with Monash in VIC


Nope - Monash has two sides as one came from an another institution's team that became part of Monash Uni (in similar manner to Magill CAE becoming part of UniSA) as well as one from Monash itself. These clubs are also based at different campuses.
Uni won't be splitting into two clubs - and it certainly hasn't been considered in the last 15-20 years. Without pre-empting anything i'd say that Uni would be much more likely to try to stick its c grade in a competition that's more consistent than the potential one above though.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

2015 - Divisions for all

Post by marbles »

Ladies & Gentleman announcing a solution for you all...

This solution is based on 1 club - Kilburn

In observing they are now forfeiting every game, the prospect of them having 2 sides come March 2015 may be very slim. The league wont allow them to stay in Div 4. Theyll have to be removed.

This benefits everyone, 3 sides will have to come up from every division below, and as a result Div 7 will actually list all the clubs who have hit hard times in 2014.

This along with the creation of the C-Grade Super League, every club in the league excluding Kilburn is to benefit from an up-shuffle.

The only dilemma now is that the new Div 7 boys will have to play each other 3 times, and its still not known whether any of them can field 2 teams. Maybe it will have to become a 1 team per club division???....

2015z.jpg
2015z.jpg (67.83 KiB) Viewed 3689 times


Now how do you's all feel about this one???
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by marbles »

hmmm wait div 7 with 6 placements play each other 3 times (5*3=15 rounds) - f##k wont work
cracka
Veteran
Posts: 3961
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:11 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Onkaparinga Valley
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 633 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by cracka »

Gotta give you credit for persistence.
X Runna
Reserves
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:47 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 124 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by X Runna »

**** off marbles - are you the dumbest prick I've ever heard of?

NOBODY here gives a shit about your "BLUE-CHIP" Henley, crawl back under your rock.
Neverwasgood
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:23 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Payneham NU
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by Neverwasgood »

Give up
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:12 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by heater31 »

Also the shit you have been posting recently has got similar treatment.

Give it up sunshine nobody cares about your nonsense posting.....
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by Q. »

Another thread?

You raise a good point though, we've got no idea what will happen to some clubs over the next six months. Maybe there will only be enough teams for six divisions?
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by marbles »

Q. wrote:Another thread?

You raise a good point though, we've got no idea what will happen to some clubs over the next six months. Maybe there will only be enough teams for six divisions?


yeah another thread a new design

hopefully this saves Mitchell Park, Angle Vale, Flinders Uni, Wingfield, Kilburn for at least another year

Plus the clubs with 4 sides gain a better environment to flourish and to restore the recent erosions

apparently nobody cares for this though, let them all die seems to be the norm
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
Posts: 2079
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Christies Beach
Has thanked: 154 times
Been thanked: 289 times
Contact:

Re: 2015 - Divisions for all

Post by Look Good In Leather »

marbles wrote:Ladies & Gentleman announcing a solution for you all...

This solution is based on 1 club - Kilburn

In observing they are now forfeiting every game, the prospect of them having 2 sides come March 2015 may be very slim. The league wont allow them to stay in Div 4. Theyll have to be removed.

This benefits everyone, 3 sides will have to come up from every division below, and as a result Div 7 will actually list all the clubs who have hit hard times in 2014.

This along with the creation of the C-Grade Super League, every club in the league excluding Kilburn is to benefit from an up-shuffle.

The only dilemma now is that the new Div 7 boys will have to play each other 3 times, and its still not known whether any of them can field 2 teams. Maybe it will have to become a 1 team per club division???....

2015z.jpg


Now how do you's all feel about this one???


Put Uni, Modbury, Henley, Smosh + one other in Div 7, shuffle Div 9 into the C Grades and all is good.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests