PDCA

no_remorse28 · Post by **no_remorse28** » Wed May 19, 2021 6:45 pm

The Merger has been all the talk for over 10 years, the problem is Enfield have no interest in being re named Kildogs

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Wed May 19, 2021 6:53 pm

Reckon talks first started in like 2005 when both clubs were battling. Never happened though, Kilburn always needed Enfield more than the other way around, and the talk all along was more around Kilburn absorbing Enfield.

Funnily enough it was a Kilburn life member (playing at Enfield) heavily involved in the discussions. :lol:

All this chat though has upset the KCC chairman Jay Woolford, and rattled the Chics committee - JayWo is doing a great job out there, he’s got great energy, drive and passion.

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Wed May 19, 2021 7:38 pm

Congratulations on the award Bedge, nice photo

no_remorse28 · Post by **no_remorse28** » Wed May 19, 2021 7:52 pm

The Bedge wrote:Reckon talks first started in like 2005 when both clubs were battling. Never happened though, Kilburn always needed Enfield more than the other way around, and the talk all along was more around Kilburn absorbing Enfield.

Funnily enough it was a Kilburn life member (playing at Enfield) heavily involved in the discussions.

All this chat though has upset the KCC chairman Jay Woolford, and rattled the Chics committee - JayWo is doing a great job out there, he’s got great energy, drive and passion.

I couldn't agree more with how lucky they are to have Jay, many have tried and felt they got know where, but Jay seems to really be improving cricjet and has brought its relevance back to the club again, people like him are worth there weight in gold.

Back onto PDCA, congratulations on the club of the year

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Thu May 20, 2021 8:31 am

Brodlach wrote:Congratulations on the award Bedge, nice photo

He's been on "The Biggest Winner".

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu May 20, 2021 8:36 am

Brodlach wrote:Congratulations on the award Bedge, nice photo

Yesterday was the moment I realised shit I’ve stacked on some serious weight! :oops:

Day 1 of operation stop being a fat **** starts today :lol:

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Thu May 20, 2021 9:17 am

The Bedge wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Congratulations on the award Bedge, nice photo

Yesterday was the moment I realised shit I’ve stacked on some serious weight!

Day 1 of operation stop being a fat **** starts today

Let me know if you need any assistance mate, I was heading that way late last year and then got serious, even when my hammies went 3 times and I had to stop the running I found ways to plateau my weight without enduring hell or missing out food wise.

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Thu May 20, 2021 9:21 am

Photos always add , I meant you didn’t look overly impressed :lol:

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Thu May 20, 2021 9:32 am

Brodlach wrote:Photos always add , I meant you didn’t look overly impressed

Not really a photo kind of person haha! I had tried smiling for a bit, but I find it hard to force a smile.

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Thu May 20, 2021 9:47 am

The Bedge wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Photos always add , I meant you didn’t look overly impressed

Not really a photo kind of person haha! I had tried smiling for a bit, but I find it hard to force a smile.

I don't know how women do it? I hate having my photo done, I feel like a dickhead standing there and then I'll pick it to pieces anyway.

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Thu May 20, 2021 9:53 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:
The Bedge wrote:
Brodlach wrote:Photos always add , I meant you didn’t look overly impressed

Not really a photo kind of person haha! I had tried smiling for a bit, but I find it hard to force a smile.

I don't know how women do it? I hate having my photo done, I feel like a dickhead standing there and then I'll pick it to pieces anyway.

100% with you, I hate it.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Thu May 20, 2021 10:02 am

Congratulations Bedge, you should be proud of your clubs achievements, well done to all involved and well done on leading the team.

Dr Phil · Post by **Dr Phil** » Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:23 am

Thoughts on junior cricket in PDCA? Im alluding to the potential moving of u16s to a the north east comp.

Sent from my SM-J530Y using Tapatalk

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:31 am

Dr Phil wrote:Thoughts on junior cricket in PDCA? Im alluding to the potential moving of u16s to a the north east comp.

SACA will end up coordinating all junior formats. I don’t mind it, clearly there’s a gap in PDCA juniors, had a quick read over the 16’s and 18’s proposed format seems reasonable.

Dr Phil · Post by **Dr Phil** » Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:58 am

The Bedge wrote:
Dr Phil wrote:Thoughts on junior cricket in PDCA? Im alluding to the potential moving of u16s to a the north east comp.

SACA will end up coordinating all junior formats. I don’t mind it, clearly there’s a gap in PDCA juniors, had a quick read over the 16’s and 18’s proposed format seems reasonable.

What is the gap in the pdca juniors?

Sent from my SM-J530Y using Tapatalk

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:39 am

Dr Phil wrote:Thoughts on junior cricket in PDCA? Im alluding to the potential moving of u16s to a the north east comp.

Sent from my SM-J530Y using Tapatalk

Playing 8 a side T20's doesn't do a lot for development within the comp, the better players bat high and bowl while the lesser skilled players basically participate.

Unfortunately there's not a lot the PDCA can do about, upper aged junior community cricket is akin to flogging a dead horse, the young lads are getting girls and finding part time jobs so cricket is taking a back seat.

The Barossa have got it right by playing on a Friday arvo, the names floating about in that comp look healthy.

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:31 am

Proposed formats:
U16's - mixed format:
2 day fixture, 60 overs per side max;
1 day fixture 40 overs per side max;
Min 9 players

U18's - One day comp prior to xmas, T20 from Jan to March. Finals in both formats.
One dayers are 40 overs with max 10 overs per bowler.

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:28 am

The Bedge wrote:Proposed formats:
U16's - mixed format:
2 day fixture, 60 overs per side max;
1 day fixture 40 overs per side max;
Min 9 players

U18's - One day comp prior to xmas, T20 from Jan to March. Finals in both formats.
One dayers are 40 overs with max 10 overs per bowler.

18's is pointless IMO, I'd only need one guess as to who would be driving that.

16's has merit, although there's going to be some kids posting very high individual totals, especially with only 7 fielders.

The Bedge · Post by **The Bedge** » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:56 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:16's has merit, although there's going to be some kids posting very high individual totals, especially with only 7 fielders.

Retire at 100.

Minimum is 9, obviously the preference is for 11 players - up to clubs to drive that and get a full side. Surely better having some sort of 16's / 18's comp than losing them between 14's and seniors?

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Mon Jun 21, 2021 12:44 pm

The Bedge wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:16's has merit, although there's going to be some kids posting very high individual totals, especially with only 7 fielders.

Retire at 100.

Minimum is 9, obviously the preference is for 11 players - up to clubs to drive that and get a full side. Surely better having some sort of 16's / 18's comp than losing them between 14's and seniors?

Shit yeah, 17's might be a better alternative, although the current 16 and under is practically that.

It's pretty crazy after being out of the loop for a while and seeing the decline.

PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Re: PDCA

Who is online