So we've gone past the deadline of 8th April - does anyone know what happens now?
Obviously a merger has not been arranged - and never would have been in 2 weeks - so we wait for SACA to issue a statement on Monday? Or is there a board meeting? I still can't actually see them punting a club.
C Horse wrote:So we've gone past the deadline of 8th April - does anyone know what happens now?
Obviously a merger has not been arranged - and never would have been in 2 weeks - so we wait for SACA to issue a statement on Monday? Or is there a board meeting? I still can't actually see them punting a club.
Guessing there will be a press release on Monday explaining the next move by SACA/or Each Club.
C Horse wrote:So we've gone past the deadline of 8th April - does anyone know what happens now?
Obviously a merger has not been arranged - and never would have been in 2 weeks - so we wait for SACA to issue a statement on Monday? Or is there a board meeting? I still can't actually see them punting a club.
Guessing there will be a press release on Monday explaining the next move by SACA/or Each Club.
Both Clubs have responded yesterday by the deadline to say they will continue to work towards a merger, preferably for 2017/18 as time against doing it next year now. That is all SACA requested, that's all they got.
Different story behind the scenes, lots going on!!
C Horse wrote:So we've gone past the deadline of 8th April - does anyone know what happens now?
Obviously a merger has not been arranged - and never would have been in 2 weeks - so we wait for SACA to issue a statement on Monday? Or is there a board meeting? I still can't actually see them punting a club.
Guessing there will be a press release on Monday explaining the next move by SACA/or Each Club.
Both Clubs have responded yesterday by the deadline to say they will continue to work towards a merger, preferably for 2017/18 as time against doing it next year now. That is all SACA requested, that's all they got.
Different story behind the scenes, lots going on!!
Exactly. Fulfil the demands of the SACA to shut them up, and tell them only the basics. Behind the scenes, it's a need to know basis, and the SACA don't need to know what's happening. They'll find out sooner or later. They'll get told what the clubs are doing, when the two clubs are good and ready, and not before hand. 13 sides will be competing next season, and that won't be changing after next season is finished.
I'll preface this by saying I am completely against a merger, particularly with how it has come about, but if WT and Port had to merge...
Name: Western Power Colours: Black, White and Teal Location: Henley Oval
West Torrens already has the strong junior program in place. Good numbers, good facilities, great location. Use the SACA's offer of $500k to work out club room arrangements and investment in more turf nets etc. Use the Power branding associated with Port Adelaide. House both clubs history, honour boards etc.
The SACA board recommends the juniors at Henley and seniors at Port Adelaide. Can't see that working. Has to be one club if a merger happens. The old West Torrens and Port clubs would be getting shafted, but that is what happens in a merger.
Aerie wrote:I'll preface this by saying I am completely against a merger, particularly with how it has come about, but if WT and Port had to merge...
Name: Western Power Colours: Black, White and Teal Location: Henley Oval
West Torrens already has the strong junior program in place. Good numbers, good facilities, great location. Use the SACA's offer of $500k to work out club room arrangements and investment in more turf nets etc. Use the Power branding associated with Port Adelaide. House both clubs history, honour boards etc.
The SACA board recommends the juniors at Henley and seniors at Port Adelaide. Can't see that working. Has to be one club if a merger happens. The old West Torrens and Port clubs would be getting shafted, but that is what happens in a merger.
You wont have to worry Aerie. There won't be any mergers. Certainly not between West Torrens and the Swampys. Both clubs will go it alone next year and there will be a 13 team comp.
oyster wrote:You wont have to worry Aerie. There won't be any mergers. Certainly not between West Torrens and the Swampys. Both clubs will go it alone next year and there will be a 13 team comp.
How are you so sure on this?
Not saying you're wrong (and I don't know either way), just wondering.
This is Tony Clifton! A name to respect! A name to fear!
oyster wrote:You wont have to worry Aerie. There won't be any mergers. Certainly not between West Torrens and the Swampys. Both clubs will go it alone next year and there will be a 13 team comp.
How are you so sure on this?
Not saying you're wrong (and I don't know either way), just wondering.
Think Oyster is just a passionate WT supporter. I don't share that confidence being involved closely, as SACA have lots of finances behind them to keep challenging us and Port, and will eventually get what they want.
I do believe will be 13 teams next year, but only 12 in 2017/18 though, unless we can really rattle them with what is planned in next fortnight! Can only pray and hope that happens.
Would of thought that SACA would of had every scenario covered considering their financial position over the clubs. If it does go down the legal path have the clubs got the $$ to cover their expenses and if they win will they have any left over to run a club effectively?
The Hound wrote:Would of thought that SACA would of had every scenario covered considering their financial position over the clubs. If it does go down the legal path have the clubs got the $$ to cover their expenses and if they win will they have any left over to run a club effectively?
I wouldn't be confident SACA has any scenarios covered.
The Hound wrote:Would of thought that SACA would of had every scenario covered considering their financial position over the clubs. If it does go down the legal path have the clubs got the $$ to cover their expenses and if they win will they have any left over to run a club effectively?
Good point Hound. Last thing Clubs can afford is massive Legal bills, but both Clubs have high profile people helping out, so costs low at this stage.
The Hound wrote:Would of thought that SACA would of had every scenario covered considering their financial position over the clubs. If it does go down the legal path have the clubs got the $$ to cover their expenses and if they win will they have any left over to run a club effectively?
Good point Hound. Last thing Clubs can afford is massive Legal bills, but both Clubs have high profile people helping out, so costs low at this stage.
As Gough famously said, with a slight change. Ladies and gentlemen, well may we say 'God Save the Queen', because nothing will save the SACA board now. None of the SACA board would've had any idea of the flak they would cop. Gladly I can say, what they've copped so far, is only a drop in the ocean to what is planned over the next few months.
