SANFL Clubs

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
Alex
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:03 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Brisbane Lions
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Alex »

Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Jim05 »

Alex wrote:Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc
Port can’t afford either model currently.
They are requiring AFL bail out money to stay afloat.
Brett
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1120
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:07 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Brett »

Alex wrote:Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc


Is that you LMA LOL. Mate I think you need to get up to speed with what is happening. Again Port are in financial difficulty. The AFL now control your franchise. How could it be cost-effective ?
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by stan »

Jim05 wrote:
Alex wrote:Continuing to have the magpies is probably the most cost effective version of a reserves team though. If anything it's become more desirable than pre corona when there was talk of an AFL reserves league etc
Port can’t afford either model currently.
They are requiring AFL bail out money to stay afloat.
Bang on and exactly what I have been saying, no $$$ means no team. The AFL are going to find it hard to keep themselves afloat and the scrubber teams without also looking after reserve teams.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
sib
Rookie
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:59 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by sib »

I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.
User avatar
PatowalongaPirate
2022 SA Footy Punter of the Year
Posts: 6410
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:01 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Essendon
Team: Sacred Heart OC
Location: Tiger Land
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 1360 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by PatowalongaPirate »

No chance.
safooty Melbourne Cup Day Tipping Champion 2018 & 2019 #Back2Back
2018 safooty NFL Tipping Champion
Spargo’s Good Friday Cup Champion 2026
User avatar
Alex
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:03 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Brisbane Lions
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Alex »

sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.


That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16425
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by amber_fluid »

Alex wrote:
sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.


That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power


They should never of changed it originally.

Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
Alex
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:03 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Brisbane Lions
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Alex »

amber_fluid wrote:
Alex wrote:
sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.


That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power


They should never of changed it originally.

Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.


Rubbish
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16425
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by amber_fluid »

Alex wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
Alex wrote:
sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.


That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power


They should never of changed it originally.

Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.



Rubbish


The only thing rubbish is the power reserves players running around in magpie guernseys.

You happy with that arrangement?
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Jim05 »

Alex wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
Alex wrote:
sib wrote:I can see the SANFL bailing Port out but in return they have to have no association with the PAFC in the AFl. A separate ground, membership and Admin Areas. They will have their own CSO etc. Much like it was. Players to be split between all 9 SANFL clubs. That includes the new SANFL Port.


That would be a dream come true for us Port fans who have no interest in Port power


They should never of changed it originally.

Shut the doors of the Magpies forever please.
It’s better for all that way.


Rubbish
Not rubbish.
Port had outgrown the SANFL and wanted to play with the big boys. Should’ve been a clean break but the foolish SANFL had other ideas unfortunately
topshelf
Rookie
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:22 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by topshelf »

Sounding more likely they are gone, although the crows apparently remain confident of having a side. Can't have one of them in and not the other, one out both out thanks. They are talking like it would be just for this season. That would be an absolute joke if we allow them back in after, now is the time to fix the decision made the first time.
Brett
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1120
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:07 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Brett »

topshelf wrote:Sounding more likely they are gone, although the crows apparently remain confident of having a side. Can't have one of them in and not the other, one out both out thanks. They are talking like it would be just for this season. That would be an absolute joke if we allow them back in after, now is the time to fix the decision made the first time.

Why not ? I think I heard someone say this recently? lol May not happen but .........
User avatar
Alex
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:03 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Brisbane Lions
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Alex »

No I'm not happy with the power reserves playing for Port Adelaide but when you love something that has become damaged or ill then I'd prefer to live in hope of repairing it rather than just give up.
User avatar
Alex
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:03 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Brisbane Lions
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Alex »

Also, Port never left the SANFL because they outgrew it. The team that went into the AFL was crows #2. Contrived meaningless AFL franchise crap that tried to feed off the Port heritage (when it suits and disown it at others). I just LOL at how the merchandise all use to say established 1997 until a few years back when suddenly they decided that they could say they are the team from 1870. Unfortunately most younger people and morons have now accepted this new revision of history.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16425
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by amber_fluid »

Alex wrote:No I'm not happy with the power reserves playing for Port Adelaide but when you love something that has become damaged or ill then I'd prefer to live in hope of repairing it rather than just give up.


I hear what you’re saying.
I’ve lived in hope for many years as well.
But unfortunately it won’t happen.
There just isn’t the coin to support that business concept.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Brett
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1120
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:07 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by Brett »

With the AFL now in Ports control, I would like to know if the AFL deliberately not allow a Crows reserves team in the SANFL? It may turn out that neither franchises aren't part of it but I would not write off a 9 team competition next year. It changes quickly.
It will make it very interesting as I cant see an AFL reserves competition.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20241
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2496 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by DOC »

Brett wrote:With the AFL now in Ports control, I would like to know if the AFL deliberately not allow a Crows reserves team in the SANFL? It may turn out that neither franchises aren't part of it but I would not write off a 9 team competition next year. It changes quickly.
It will make it very interesting as I cant see an AFL reserves competition.


That is news, Booney and LMA will be smug.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16425
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by amber_fluid »

DOC wrote:
Brett wrote:With the AFL now in Ports control, I would like to know if the AFL deliberately not allow a Crows reserves team in the SANFL? It may turn out that neither franchises aren't part of it but I would not write off a 9 team competition next year. It changes quickly.
It will make it very interesting as I cant see an AFL reserves competition.


That is news, Booney and LMA will be more smug.


EFA ;)
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
fish
Coach
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:58 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 48 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL Clubs

Post by fish »

Centrals have now launched another fundraiser that is focussed on past players and officials, called The Dog Pack https://asf.org.au/projects/central-district-football-club/the-dog-pack/

It has raised over $15k so far including a donation from boof Lehmann :-BD
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 205 guests