Taking Francis off our hands for a packet of chips. Reckon he will do ok in their systemArmchair expert wrote:Absolute silence from the Swans so far, assuming they have some academy rorts once again!
2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1136 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
- Lightning McQueen
- Coach
- Posts: 55278
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
- Location: Radiator Springs
- Has thanked: 4974 times
- Been thanked: 9056 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Jim05 wrote:Taking Francis off our hands for a packet of chips. Reckon he will do ok in their systemArmchair expert wrote:Absolute silence from the Swans so far, assuming they have some academy rorts once again!
Will go well with their COLA
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
-
UK Fan
- Coach
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:41 am
- Team: Central District
- Has thanked: 1374 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Well played Port Adelaide.
Quality trade.
A great replacement for Robbie!!
Quality trade.
A great replacement for Robbie!!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
-
The Bedge
- Coach
- Posts: 17877
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:28 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Location: BarbeeCueAria
- Has thanked: 3336 times
- Been thanked: 4469 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
UK Fan wrote:Well played Port Adelaide.
Quality trade.
A great replacement for Robbie!!
Are you sick?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1136 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Grundy to the Dees for pick 27, they have nailed this trade period IMO
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:55 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Booney wrote:
Everyone was young once....
Yeah but they weren't playing for Geelong at the time.
regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Grundy to Dees for pick 27
Frampton to Collingwood for future 3rd
Frampton to Collingwood for future 3rd
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2936 times
- Been thanked: 4838 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
valleys07 wrote:whufc wrote:Zurhaar might be a knob but it's not often you see a player make comments on another playing leaving in such a manner.
There is enough there amongst all the stories to suggest JHF may have also been as much of the problem as the Kangas are a bit of a rabble. You also didn't see a wealth of Kangas players lining up in the media making comments like they really hoped he stayed etc. Unlike at the GC where their leadership group came out publicly pleading Rankine to stay. Throw in the Kangas have let him go imo on the cheap side suggests they are somewhat glad to see the back of him.
All trades have an element of risk but geez Port are either going to look like heroes or flops. Best case JHF becomes the player everyone thinks he will be and Rioli settles by being back in SA and gets back to his best WC form. Worst case Rioli flops and just gets in more strife and JHF was a man child who peaked at 17 years old.
Or, does this reflect the culture of NMFC?
It can be spun both ways.
If it was a poor culture then wouldn't there be players leaving in droves? Only player that has left that we wanted to keep in the last 6-7 years was Ben Brown, he got an extra year at Melbourne
There is a number of players now indicating JHF wasn't well liked there, in that case him staying was untenable for all parties.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Dutchy wrote:valleys07 wrote:whufc wrote:Zurhaar might be a knob but it's not often you see a player make comments on another playing leaving in such a manner.
There is enough there amongst all the stories to suggest JHF may have also been as much of the problem as the Kangas are a bit of a rabble. You also didn't see a wealth of Kangas players lining up in the media making comments like they really hoped he stayed etc. Unlike at the GC where their leadership group came out publicly pleading Rankine to stay. Throw in the Kangas have let him go imo on the cheap side suggests they are somewhat glad to see the back of him.
All trades have an element of risk but geez Port are either going to look like heroes or flops. Best case JHF becomes the player everyone thinks he will be and Rioli settles by being back in SA and gets back to his best WC form. Worst case Rioli flops and just gets in more strife and JHF was a man child who peaked at 17 years old.
Or, does this reflect the culture of NMFC?
It can be spun both ways.
If it was a poor culture then wouldn't there be players leaving in droves? Only player that has left that we wanted to keep in the last 6-7 years was Ben Brown, he got an extra year at Melbourne
There is a number of players now indicating JHF wasn't well liked there, in that case him staying was untenable for all parties.
Just because you wanted them doesn't mean anyone else did.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1136 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Pies supposedly paying $300k per year of Grundy’s wage too. Pies just dropped their strides and touched their toes in that oneBooney wrote:Grundy to Dees for pick 27
Frampton to Collingwood for future 3rd
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1136 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Any truth that JHF acted like a bit of a prat at Mad Monday and a few North players confronted him?Dutchy wrote:valleys07 wrote:whufc wrote:Zurhaar might be a knob but it's not often you see a player make comments on another playing leaving in such a manner.
There is enough there amongst all the stories to suggest JHF may have also been as much of the problem as the Kangas are a bit of a rabble. You also didn't see a wealth of Kangas players lining up in the media making comments like they really hoped he stayed etc. Unlike at the GC where their leadership group came out publicly pleading Rankine to stay. Throw in the Kangas have let him go imo on the cheap side suggests they are somewhat glad to see the back of him.
All trades have an element of risk but geez Port are either going to look like heroes or flops. Best case JHF becomes the player everyone thinks he will be and Rioli settles by being back in SA and gets back to his best WC form. Worst case Rioli flops and just gets in more strife and JHF was a man child who peaked at 17 years old.
Or, does this reflect the culture of NMFC?
It can be spun both ways.
If it was a poor culture then wouldn't there be players leaving in droves? Only player that has left that we wanted to keep in the last 6-7 years was Ben Brown, he got an extra year at Melbourne
There is a number of players now indicating JHF wasn't well liked there, in that case him staying was untenable for all parties.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Jim05 wrote:Any truth that JHF acted like a bit of a prat at Mad Monday and a few North players confronted him?
That was held back in March mate, nobody will remember.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2936 times
- Been thanked: 4838 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
No idea and it doesn't matter anymore, we all move on, be interesting to see how Roo's players react to him onfield in 2023
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Jack Bowes deal is done. The Gold Coast midfielder has been traded to Geelong, as well as pick No.7, for a future third-round pick
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
-
whufc
- Coach
- Posts: 29217
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: BSR
- Location: Blakeview
- Has thanked: 6065 times
- Been thanked: 2933 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Dutchy wrote:No idea and it doesn't matter anymore, we all move on, be interesting to see how Roo's players react to him onfield in 2023
The positive is it might actually attract a crowd to a Port/NM game.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
-
Kahuna
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2634
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:15 pm
- Team: Central District
- Team: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 602 times
- Been thanked: 226 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Jim05 wrote:Grundy to the Dees for pick 27, they have nailed this trade period IMO
Grun-Dee!
-
MW
- Coach
- Posts: 14197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
- Team: West Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 2804 times
- Been thanked: 2098 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Booney wrote:Jack Bowes deal is done. The Gold Coast midfielder has been traded to Geelong, as well as pick No.7, for a future third-round pick
I know they take on the $, but this deal makes a mockery of the AFL. At the very least if they take the $ on, it needs to be as per the old contract, not allowed to spread it out.
-
tigerpie
- Coach
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Collingwood
- Has thanked: 651 times
- Been thanked: 529 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Jim05 wrote:Pies supposedly paying $300k per year of Grundy’s wage too. Pies just dropped their strides and touched their toes in that oneBooney wrote:Grundy to Dees for pick 27
Frampton to Collingwood for future 3rd
Something doesn't add up here.
$900k goes for pick 27.
Just wondering if there's a medical issue that we know about but Melbourne doesn't?
Not sitting well with me that's for sure.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:They'll use pick 7 to get Bruhn from GWS, pick 12 in 2020.
Effectively they'll get 3 top 12 picks in (Bowes, Bruhn pick 7) for nothing.
If we use pick 7 on Bruhn that's two top 12 picks. We don't get to use 7 twice. It's good to see the battling clubs get a break here...
regards,
REB
I meant pick 18 for Bruhn so yeah, Geelong end up with Bowes, Bruhn and 7 for pick 18 and a future 4th. System is broken.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64104
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8792 times
- Been thanked: 12735 times
- Contact:
Re: 2022 AFL offseason - trades - draft
tigerpie wrote:Jim05 wrote:Pies supposedly paying $300k per year of Grundy’s wage too. Pies just dropped their strides and touched their toes in that oneBooney wrote:Grundy to Dees for pick 27
Frampton to Collingwood for future 3rd
Something doesn't add up here.
$900k goes for pick 27.
Just wondering if there's a medical issue that we know about but Melbourne doesn't?
Not sitting well with me that's for sure.
What shouldn't sit well with you is your club continuing to make list management / contract spend mistakes. This has to be the last time they pay someone to play for another club.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 234 guests
