Squids wrote:Looks like the gulf of SV is getting a nice drink...Adelaide might get a few sips if lucky.
A minor technicality.... but its "Gulf St Vincent" not "The Gulf of St Vincent"...
Squids wrote:Looks like the gulf of SV is getting a nice drink...Adelaide might get a few sips if lucky.
Bully wrote:yea, all that water, wasted
Booney wrote:Squids wrote:Looks like the gulf of SV is getting a nice drink...Adelaide might get a few sips if lucky.
A minor technicality.... but its "Gulf St Vincent" not "The Gulf of St Vincent"...

Squids wrote:Booney wrote:Squids wrote:Looks like the gulf of SV is getting a nice drink...Adelaide might get a few sips if lucky.
A minor technicality.... but its "Gulf St Vincent" not "The Gulf of St Vincent"...
cool story bro
Bully wrote:Yeah, realease all of the water to the downstream parts of the country and have 5 million people die of thirst.
Yeah, much better result there
Booney wrote:Squids wrote:Looks like the gulf of SV is getting a nice drink...Adelaide might get a few sips if lucky.
A minor technicality.... but its "Gulf St Vincent" not "The Gulf of St Vincent"...
Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Bully wrote:Yeah, realease all of the water to the downstream parts of the country and have 5 million people die of thirst.
Yeah, much better result there
5 million people would indeed be a tragedy, 5 million Queenslanders - meh.
do you actually believe what you post, if you do it could explain why Queenslanders left Jo in power so longBully wrote:yeah, and im told queenslanders are selfish with the water that falls on the ground that we pay taxes on.
Ian wrote:do you actually believe what you post, if you do it could explain why Queenslanders left Jo in power so longBully wrote:yeah, and im told queenslanders are selfish with the water that falls on the ground that we pay taxes on.
Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Just a minor correction there Bully; you don't pay taxes on the water that falls on the ground, you pay for your use of the water from the tap, as do South Australians. The price that is charged is based upon the cost to get the water to your tap + profit as the water companies are generally private enterprises. Rainfall is not taxed. The water flowing down rivers and streams is not taxed. there is only a charge when people choose to extract that water to use either commercially or domestically.
Bully wrote:Roxy the Rat Girl wrote:Just a minor correction there Bully; you don't pay taxes on the water that falls on the ground, you pay for your use of the water from the tap, as do South Australians. The price that is charged is based upon the cost to get the water to your tap + profit as the water companies are generally private enterprises. Rainfall is not taxed. The water flowing down rivers and streams is not taxed. there is only a charge when people choose to extract that water to use either commercially or domestically.
Typical South Australians (yes I am one of them), has to be all about them.Im trying to have a sense of humour hereLighten up a bit !
Bully wrote:Dry humour - as in no rain I.e dry humour
But I am sure you will find another issue with this post, as you do with the rest of mine continually
Bully wrote:Yeah, realease all of the water to the downstream parts of the country and have 5 million people die of thirst.
Yeah, much better result there
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests