Port Adelaide 2015

[Zorro]

Not that i watch alot of games but i get the feeling Port are right in the middle of what Hinkley has acheived so far, the firs year they definitely over achieved and then this year horribly under achieved. Personally i would think they probably have the list of 5-7 side.

Hinkleys first year was 2013, Geelong knocked them out in the finals. I think they had a good season, wouldn't say they over achieved, if that's even possible.

Yeah i would have him down as

2013- par to maybe slightly above par
2014- exceptional / over acheived
2015- extremly dissapointing / under achevied

[Spargo]

Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

[HH3]

Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

I also read another club could be interested as well.

[Spargo]

Booney in 5,4,3,2,1

[bennymacca]

Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

Would be great off half back for the crows

[JK]

There's been rumours for a few months now that the Crows will keep a fair portion of their Salary Cap available for a decent go at Wingard when he comes out of contract (which I think is end of 2016?).

[RustyCage]

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1442910453.150271.jpg (195.02 KiB) Viewed 2348 times

[Ruben Carter]

Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

I'd rather not have Dixon if it means trading Hartlett. Can't we do a package deal with Mitchell, O'Shea and B Ebert instead?
Not happy still ? Have Butcher as well.

[bennymacca]

There's been rumours for a few months now that the Crows will keep a fair portion of their Salary Cap available for a decent go at Wingard when he comes out of contract (which I think is end of 2016?).

there is no way in hell he would come. seems fanciful at best given port will give him what he is worth, and he would stay in adelaide regardless

[Spargo]

Reports out of Melb that fitting Dixon into Port's already stretched salary cap means a current higher profile player casualty - Hamish Hartlett.
It is alleged the Crows & Melbourne have shown interest....

I'd rather not have Dixon if it means trading Hartlett. Can't we do a package deal with Mitchell, O'Shea and B Ebert instead?
Not happy still ? Have Butcher as well.

A Port supporter who doesn't rate Ebert? Well I'll be f#cked, maybe you don't all have the blinkers on.

[JK]

There's been rumours for a few months now that the Crows will keep a fair portion of their Salary Cap available for a decent go at Wingard when he comes out of contract (which I think is end of 2016?).

there is no way in hell he would come. seems fanciful at best given port will give him what he is worth, and he would stay in adelaide regardless

I can't see it happening but it came from a pretty close source - wouldn't blame the Crows for trying but doubt they'd be able to swing it.

[Booney]

Booney in 5,4,3,2,1

Yeah, nah, DW gets all testy if I comment on Port Adelaide matters too much.

[Lightning McQueen]

A Port supporter who doesn't rate Ebert? Well I'll be f#cked, maybe you don't all have the blinkers on.

He's a strong lad that can find the ball, his disposal is poor and he goes missing in the tough games.

[bennymacca]

can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

[Booney]

A Port supporter who doesn't rate Ebert? Well I'll be f#cked, maybe you don't all have the blinkers on.

He's a strong lad that can find the ball, his disposal is poor and he goes missing in the tough games.

He, IMO, was out best player in the first 5 weeks of this year, widely spoken about how tough that early draw was too.

From that he got a dose of the fumbles, his disposal efficiency went down and he went from one of our premier midfielders to well behind several others. He's capable, but he's no Dangerfield.

[Booney]

can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

Tell you what, send us the two first rounders you get for Danger and we'll send you Ebert. Ok?

[hawks21]

can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

Nah, i'll take 150 Dangerfield games over 250 Ebert games

[valleys07]

can the crows draft ebert instead of dangerfield now?

Nah, i'll take 150 Dangerfield games over 250 Ebert games

Neither win you a premiership.

[Lightning McQueen]

He's a strong lad that can find the ball, his disposal is poor and he goes missing in the tough games.

He, IMO, was out best player in the first 5 weeks of this year, widely spoken about how tough that early draw was too.

From that he got a dose of the fumbles, his disposal efficiency went down and he went from one of our premier midfielders to well behind several others. He's capable, but he's no Dangerfield.

My brother and I have had about a 3 year argument about him, he goes nuts about his turnovers and I stick up for him because he gets the ball, his decision making is very poor at times.

[helicopterking]

I remember copping crap from Port Supporters about 'Stealing' Ebert from WC. Smart move by both parties, as he wouldn't be getting a game a WC.