Yangebup wrote:What is the selection criteria to be in the a Hall of Fame? Does the club have to nominate the person?
eg Anthony Stevens has just been named as the 8th legend at North Melbourne, but isnt in the Hall of Fame.
He played 292 games, was Club captain, All Australian, played in 2 Premierships, won 2 B&F's & 4 times r/up & is the heart & soul of the Kangas.
The 7 other Legends at the Roos are:
Wayne Schimmelbusch, John Dugdale, Keith Greig, David Dench, Allen Aylett, Les Foote & Lawrie Dwyer.
Its very Interesting that Norths all time greatest player Wayne Carey isnt a Legend at the Roos
4 times he came second? Hopefully it wasn't to Carey again
I had a look but I can't find when Anthony Stevens was the runner up BnF. Carey won the BnF in 1992, 93, 96 and 98. Stevens was named best team man in 1996.
Everyone who's ass points to the ground knows Wayne Carey is the greatest Roo ever if not the best AFL player ever, So these bullshit popularity awards means sweet FA.
For what it's worth I hold A.Stevens in the highest regard was a fantastic footballer. And no one will argue Archer's guts,Spirit and heart.
David King could carry Wayne Carey's bag to the game!
carey wrote:Everyone who's ass points to the ground knows Wayne Carey is the greatest Roo ever if not the best AFL player ever, So these bullshit popularity awards means sweet FA.
For what it's worth I hold A.Stevens in the highest regard was a fantastic footballer. And no one will argue Archer's guts,Spirit and heart.
David King could carry Wayne Carey's bag to the game!
Must have broken you when he ended up at the crows.
carey wrote:Everyone who's ass points to the ground knows Wayne Carey is the greatest Roo ever if not the best AFL player ever, So these bullshit popularity awards means sweet FA.
For what it's worth I hold A.Stevens in the highest regard was a fantastic footballer. And no one will argue Archer's guts,Spirit and heart.
David King could carry Wayne Carey's bag to the game!
Exactly! Stevens, Archer, Harvey etc were all good players(still are in Boomers case) but to compare them to Wayne Carey is just plain stupid!
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Jim05 wrote:Is Carey still out of the fold at North? Was mentioned that he was in Bali currently and the only one missing from their 96 Premiership reunion
Always a long way back when your banging your mates wife.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
HH3 wrote:They're just jealous because neither of their teams have enough history to award legend status to anybody.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
yeah hardly any 300 game players at the Crows...4 over 25 years vs North with 5 over 100+ years.
That seriously has to be the longest bow drawn ever on this site! Nice! You do realise 100+ years is more than 25? You actually backed up what he said!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
HH3 wrote:They're just jealous because neither of their teams have enough history to award legend status to anybody.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
yeah hardly any 300 game players at the Crows...4 over 25 years vs North with 5 over 100+ years.
That seriously has to be the longest bow drawn ever on this site! Nice! You do realise 100+ years is more than 25? You actually backed up what he said!
He does have a bit of a habit of saying stupid shit and for some reason, it always refers back to the Crows lol.
So you've seen everything have you? Yep Have you ever seen a man eat his own head? No Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
HH3 wrote:They're just jealous because neither of their teams have enough history to award legend status to anybody.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
yeah hardly any 300 game players at the Crows...4 over 25 years vs North with 5 over 100+ years.
That seriously has to be the longest bow drawn ever on this site! Nice! You do realise 100+ years is more than 25? You actually backed up what he said!
He said neither of their teams has enough history to be awarded legend status to anyone, my point was 4 x 300 game players over 25 years who are all legends of the club vs 5 x 300 game players over 100+ years to get the same result. Pretty easy to understand Wedgie, even for a simpleton.
HH3 wrote:They're just jealous because neither of their teams have enough history to award legend status to anybody.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
yeah hardly any 300 game players at the Crows...4 over 25 years vs North with 5 over 100+ years.
That seriously has to be the longest bow drawn ever on this site! Nice! You do realise 100+ years is more than 25? You actually backed up what he said!
He does have a bit of a habit of saying stupid shit and for some reason, it always refers back to the Crows lol.
I wouldn't expect a bum crack to understand what I was saying.
