The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Magellan · Post by **Magellan** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:07 am

stan wrote:This is histerical really. The source is KG. It will probably be confirmed by Jars........

Bring back Ralphie the Rumour Monger.

Pseudo · Post by **Pseudo** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:52 am

Booney wrote:"So, who is your source?"

"K.G"

Has this been checked?
YES!
How many sources?
ONE!
Name it.
K.G.!

stan · Post by **stan** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:07 pm

Booney wrote:
stan wrote:This is histerical really. The source is KG. It will probably be confirmed by Jars........

Well, he was right about Clarkson coaching the Crows.

And then further confirm by Rowey. We could have all the SA media stars on this one.

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:13 pm

Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:"So, who is your source?"

"K.G"

Has this been checked?
YES!
How many sources?
ONE!
Name it.
K.G.!

"KG? He's a malaka, isn't he John? For the viewers at home John, what does malaka mean???"

goddy11 · Post by **goddy11** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:21 pm

am Bays wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
Booney wrote:"So, who is your source?"

"K.G"

Has this been checked?
YES!
How many sources?
ONE!
Name it.
K.G.!

"KG? He's a malaka, isn't he John? For the viewers at home John, what does malaka mean???"

Isn't that the name of the waterway between Malaysia and Indonesia.

Magellan · Post by **Magellan** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:36 pm

"Who'd KG say is leaving the SANFL? Port and the Crows?

The Crows? Really? Faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk, faaaaarrrk!"

MW · Post by MW » Fri Mar 03, 2017 12:45 pm

Adelaide contributed $2.69 million to the SANFL so it could field a standalone team in the state-wide competition.

Still want them out of the competition?

therisingblues · Post by **therisingblues** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 12:47 pm

Yes.
Please make it happen.

MW · Post by MW » Fri Mar 03, 2017 12:52 pm

outside of my pay scale mate

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 1:06 pm

MW wrote:Adelaide contributed $2.69 million to the SANFL so it could field a standalone team in the state-wide competition.

Still want them out of the competition?

Yes, them & the pams can f#ck right off.

Ronnie · Post by **Ronnie** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 1:27 pm

MW wrote:Adelaide contributed $2.69 million to the SANFL so it could field a standalone team in the state-wide competition.

Still want them out of the competition?

Isn't it more like $400,000?

MW · Post by MW » Fri Mar 03, 2017 1:28 pm

not according to the Crows AGM

Ronnie · Post by **Ronnie** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 1:33 pm

MW wrote:not according to the Crows AGM

yeah I saw that figure and wonder how they arrive at it.

Strictly speaking it was an information session. Crows members are not allowed to attend their AGM. That is held with an AFL representative.

Magellan · Post by **Magellan** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 1:35 pm

Ronnie wrote:Crows members are not allowed to attend their AGM.

The team for no South Australians!

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 1:38 pm

MW wrote:not according to the Crows AGM

Correction

Not according to what's documented in The Advertiser.

The $2.69 Mill is not just for playing in the the SANFL, $400 K for playing in the SANFL the balance would be as part of the return to the SMA for playing games at AO which then goes to the SANFL.

Not that the Advertiser would put it's own spin on anything to do with the AFL clubs here in SA. :roll:

Ronnie · Post by **Ronnie** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 2:36 pm

Magellan wrote:
Ronnie wrote:Crows members are not allowed to attend their AGM.

The team for no South Australians!

Seems to work ok, if you accept your football club is actually not really a football club

MW · Post by MW » Fri Mar 03, 2017 2:51 pm

I think you'll find certain members are invited, but don't let that get in the way of a shitbagging session.

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:01 pm

MW wrote:I think you'll find certain members are invited, but don't let that get in the way of a shitbagging session.

LOL i bet that 'certain members' are handpicked to cause as little disruption as possible lol

bennymacca · Post by **bennymacca** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:04 pm

hows getting invited to your AGM working for you lads?

Magellan · Post by **Magellan** » Fri Mar 03, 2017 3:05 pm

MW wrote:I think you'll find certain members are invited

Why not all?

The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Who is online