State of the game

Talk on the national game
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:52 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by bennymacca »

just make ANY punch that isn't in the play automatically intentional and min a week. no matter how slight and whether its to the guts or the head.

would stamp it out quick smart
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4292
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:57 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Location: Titan
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 268 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by marbles »

You believe a penalty will stamp out a frustrated male from brawling out a few punches in a tussle inside a muscle bound adrenaline loaded squabble?

You believe these punching prone dudes believe there currently is no penalty so they believe its ok to punch at the moment?

And your solution is to minutely enhance a penalty which already exists?

He punched my arm... he deserves a week for that!

My point is youll never stamp out punches totally
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
Posts: 9863
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:27 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has thanked: 986 times
Been thanked: 1114 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by gadj1976 »

marbles wrote:You believe a penalty will stamp out a frustrated male from brawling out a few punches in a tussle inside a muscle bound adrenaline loaded squabble?

You believe these punching prone dudes believe there currently is no penalty so they believe its ok to punch at the moment?

And your solution is to minutely enhance a penalty which already exists?

He punched my arm... he deserves a week for that!

My point is youll never stamp out punches totally


Marbles, it's the 'punching to get away from a tagger' that's the issue. The 'punching away of the arm across you' might be ok but strking to the body should be eliminated from the game. Too many times blokes have punched blokes in the stomach and run off and got a fine.
User avatar
HH3
Coach
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:44 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: North Haven
Has thanked: 3301 times
Been thanked: 2433 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by HH3 »

I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Booney »

Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by stan »

Booney wrote:Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.
Absolute disgrace if the Saints get a priority pick.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29216
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:26 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by whufc »

Booney wrote:Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.


Correct me if I'm wrong but wont their always be 3 clubs down at the bottom of the ladder.

Says everything about the mickey mouse nature of the competition that they would entertain the idea of AFL invention even further to make a team 'better'.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5169 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

whufc wrote:
Booney wrote:Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.


Correct me if I'm wrong but wont their always be 3 clubs down at the bottom of the ladder.

Says everything about the mickey mouse nature of the competition that they would entertain the idea of AFL invention even further to make a team 'better'.

There is a big gap from bottom 3 to those just a few spots higher.
Those bottom 3, for the most part are uncompetitive.
The AFL ideally want every match to be a 50-50.
But the AFL, with 18 teams, no depth leads to these situations.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by JK »

Having St Kilda even in a conversation about priority picks is insane in the membrane
FUSC
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55273
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4971 times
Been thanked: 9060 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Lightning McQueen »

JK wrote:Having St Kilda even in a conversation about priority picks is insane in the membrane

Weller Weller Weller, tell me more
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Booney »

whufc wrote:
Booney wrote:Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.


Correct me if I'm wrong but wont their always be 3 clubs down at the bottom of the ladder.

Says everything about the mickey mouse nature of the competition that they would entertain the idea of AFL invention even further to make a team 'better'.


Yep, but you want the gap between top and bottom to be as small as possible.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
HH3
Coach
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:44 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: North Haven
Has thanked: 3301 times
Been thanked: 2433 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by HH3 »

Booney wrote:
whufc wrote:
Booney wrote:Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.


Correct me if I'm wrong but wont their always be 3 clubs down at the bottom of the ladder.

Says everything about the mickey mouse nature of the competition that they would entertain the idea of AFL invention even further to make a team 'better'.


Yep, but you want the gap between top and bottom to be as small as possible.


So people want to artificially manufacture the competition between teams?

Seems pretty dodgy to me.

Whats the solution to that? Have the league take over management of clubs?

Enforce league determined trades?

Alter the scoring system? (Eg. A Carlton goal is worth 12 points.)

How about everyone plays by the same rules, and their position on the ladder is determined by their win/loss and percentage.
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 2098 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by MW »

They already alter the fixtures to make it easier for struggling clubs. Add this to giving them the best available players in the land, and then giving them the next best too for shits and gigs...what more do they need? How about auditing the way they run a f..king football department and making them actually be accountable for their work rather than rely on the AFL to hand them the best talent and soft draws to fix their f..k ups.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Booney »

MW wrote:They already alter the fixtures to make it easier for struggling clubs. Add this to giving them the best available players in the land, and then giving them the next best too for shits and gigs...what more do they need? How about auditing the way they run a f..king football department and making them actually be accountable for their work rather than rely on the AFL to hand them the best talent and soft draws to fix their f..k ups.


Make them accountable, in what way? The AFL already have Lethlean at St Kilda, Evans at Gold Coast, they send their people to the clubs in need.

I'm not advocating the priority picks by the way, just discussing what seems to be on the agenda at AFL house.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 2098 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by MW »

Not sure of the answer Boon but it's frustrating that these clubs get handed the best players and the softest draws, and like you said the best front office talent straight from the AFL, and it still happens. So they just send them more...
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29216
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:26 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by whufc »

The AFL might as well take over clubs if they want to blatantly 'give them' success.

How long until we see 'Handicaps' in AFL football. Carlton start with a line of +30, that will make games exciting ha.

Surely it's getting to a point where it's that manufactured that it is the oval shaped balls version of the WWE.

Personally I just cant get my head around it all.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
HH3
Coach
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:44 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: North Haven
Has thanked: 3301 times
Been thanked: 2433 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by HH3 »

whufc wrote:The AFL might as well take over clubs if they want to blatantly 'give them' success.

How long until we see 'Handicaps' in AFL football. Carlton start with a line of +30, that will make games exciting ha.

Surely it's getting to a point where it's that manufactured that it is the oval shaped balls version of the WWE.

Personally I just cant get my head around it all.


It's such a joke of an organisation now.
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Booney »

I think the EPL is a joke, thus, I don't bother discussing it.

;)
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Booney »

MW wrote:Not sure of the answer Boon but it's frustrating that these clubs get handed the best players and the softest draws, and like you said the best front office talent straight from the AFL, and it still happens. So they just send them more...


Frustrating? Sure is, but it's either that or we have the same 3 or 4 clubs vying for the premiership every year. I now what I'd rather.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
Posts: 9863
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:27 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has thanked: 986 times
Been thanked: 1114 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by gadj1976 »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
whufc wrote:
Booney wrote:Caro made an excellent point on Monday night on Classified.

It's not the look of the game that is the problem, it's not congestion, it's not scoring or lack thereof, it's 3 clubs, Carlton, Gold Coast and St Kilda being a rabble on the field and not much better off it that should be the first thing the AFL worry about and invest time and money to fix.

Commented that all three clubs could be in line for a priority pick at this years draft.


Correct me if I'm wrong but wont their always be 3 clubs down at the bottom of the ladder.

Says everything about the mickey mouse nature of the competition that they would entertain the idea of AFL invention even further to make a team 'better'.

There is a big gap from bottom 3 to those just a few spots higher.
Those bottom 3, for the most part are uncompetitive.
The AFL ideally want every match to be a 50-50.
But the AFL, with 18 teams, no depth leads to these situations.


True. And Leigh Montagna mentioned on Melbourne radio that having starting positions could make the blowouts worse. The reason for bringing them in is to lower congestion, which increases scoring, which will cause bigger margins between the good and the bad teams.

Not sure the AFL really wants to do this.... but they will because they're looking at the positives rather than the consequences of bringing these rules in, as they continue to do year in year out.

The NRL has the bottom team on 6 wins (from memory) and the Eels (my mob) beat a top 6 team 40-6 on the weekend. I can't see that happening with Carlton, St Kilda or Gold Coast any time soon.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests