North Melbourne

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:08 pm

This whole thread is great

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:09 pm

HH3 wrote::lol:

This whole thread is great

It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:10 pm

Spargo wrote:
HH3 wrote::lol:

This whole thread is great

It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...

I wonder if their carers know they're on chat rooms...

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:31 pm

mots02 wrote:
Spargo wrote:
mots02 wrote:
bertiebeatle wrote:
He won't end up at the PSD. Even if he did, someone else would take him before North. Also, if we offered him 4 years now he would take it. The club doesn't want to & I back them on this one

if his price is ridiculous and his feet are as bad as you say.... maybe he will walk as no one else will touch him?

If his feet were “that bad” Port wouldn’t have offered him 3 more years...

Correct... just having a giggle at Port fans claiming that he has bad feet, isn't worth the money that he's been offered or the length of contract... but he's worth a mid first round or he can get stuffed! lol

C’mon Mots02 we all know players coming to Port gain a grade or two and when they leave they get downgraded again.
Wait til Wingard leaves....... he’ll quickly go from an A+ to a B-

amber_fluid · Post by **amber_fluid** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:40 pm

HH3 wrote:
Spargo wrote:
HH3 wrote::lol:

This whole thread is great

It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...

I wonder if their carers know they're on chat rooms...

You need to get your carer to change your bib, it’s full of dribble.

HH3 · Post by **HH3** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm

amber_fluid wrote:
HH3 wrote:
Spargo wrote:
HH3 wrote::lol:

This whole thread is great

It’s quite worrying some of the shit posted here...

I wonder if their carers know they're on chat rooms...

You need to get your carer to change your bib, it’s full of dribble.

It's full of a few things

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:32 pm

He said bib not nappy

Post by **Dutchy** » Fri Sep 14, 2018 8:57 pm

We finished higher and getting stronger,while they cant hold their players :lol:

Trader · Post by **Trader** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:56 pm

Accepting blokes from clubs that didn't make the 8. It's the same mistake Port made last off-season.

PatowalongaPirate · Post by **PatowalongaPirate** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:06 pm

Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:16 am

PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.

Like North have with Polec?

Post by **Dutchy** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:19 am

Polec has said all he wanted to stay was a 4 year deal, Port said no, the future will decide who was right.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:21 am

Dutchy wrote:Polec has said all he wanted to stay was a 4 year deal, Port said no, the future will decide who was right.

It's up to John Butcher?

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:32 am

How can I "like" the search function?

15/3/17

Spargo wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:Polec is the one player with more upside than anyone on the list
If he can recapture his 2014 form and have that run and carry and deliver back in his game, he will be very important.
I know he has had injuries but he has been harshly treated by Ken and been made the scapegoat for others that should have been dropped before him IMO.

Polec

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:33 am

4/10/17

morell wrote:
Spargo wrote:
morell wrote:So did Dixon. So did Polec when we got him.

Footballers have surgery, its par for the course. As someone else mentioned, hes played at least 16 games a year since his debut.

Polec

If you think Polec isn't absolutely critical to Ports team you have NFI. Massively underrated player.

PatowalongaPirate · Post by **PatowalongaPirate** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:34 am

Booney wrote:
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.

Like North have with Polec?

Didn't Port offer Polec a contract?

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:38 am

Booney wrote:How can I "like" the search function?

15/3/17
Spargo wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:Polec is the one player with more upside than anyone on the list
If he can recapture his 2014 form and have that run and carry and deliver back in his game, he will be very important.
I know he has had injuries but he has been harshly treated by Ken and been made the scapegoat for others that should have been dropped before him IMO.

Polec

18 months ago, that’s clutching at straws if ever I saw it.
I’ve repeatedly said his form this year has been excellent & he’s made me eat some humble pie.

Spargo · Post by **Spargo** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:39 am

Booney wrote:4/10/17

morell wrote:
Spargo wrote:
morell wrote:So did Dixon. So did Polec when we got him.

Footballers have surgery, its par for the course. As someone else mentioned, hes played at least 16 games a year since his debut.

Polec

If you think Polec isn't absolutely critical to Ports team you have NFI. Massively underrated player.

Yet not critical enough at the time for Port to offer a contract extension...
You’re better than this, Booney.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:45 am

Mate, you were the one laughing at him, not me.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:46 am

PatowalongaPirate wrote:
Booney wrote:
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Port's mistake was accepting blokes whose club's didn't want them.

Like North have with Polec?

Didn't Port offer Polec a contract?

We did,but if we wanted to keep him we would have upped it, wouldn't we?

North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Re: North Melbourne

Who is online