Round nintelevewelve

[RB]

What a kick.

[Jim05]

Most corrupt sport in the world.

[LMA]

Most corrupt sport in the world.

No issues with the deliberate but the FAD, pfffft.

[Armchair expert]

******* beauty

[mighty_tiger_79]

Looks like i need to rewatch the last minute or so

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

[Armchair expert]

Most corrupt sport in the world.

Agreed, not many sports have teams running systematic doping programs

[Jim05]

Most corrupt sport in the world.

Agreed, not many sports have teams running systematic doping programs

Umpires don’t even know the rules. You can’t pay a free down the ground in that instance

[Armchair expert]

Most corrupt sport in the world.

Agreed, not many sports have teams running systematic doping programs

Umpires don’t even know the rules. You can’t pay a free down the ground in that instance

Yep should have been a 50 on a better angle

[Jim05]

Most corrupt sport in the world.

Agreed, not many sports have teams running systematic doping programs

Umpires don’t even know the rules. You can’t pay a free down the ground in that instance

Yep should have been a 50 on a better angle

From the laws of football


The free kick is awarded at the spot where the kick or handpass lands or is first possessed, to the nearest player to the spot (unless the disposal is backwards, or the ball lands out of bounds or through for a behind, in which case the free kick is awarded to the infringed player at the spot of the infringement"

The umpire should never be allowed to umpire another game

[JK]

Between the draw the other night and the Blues tonight, massive hit in my tips, but worth it, not too many better finishes.

[daysofourlives]

Agreed, not many sports have teams running systematic doping programs [/quote]Umpires don’t even know the rules. You can’t pay a free down the ground in that instance[/quote]

Yep should have been a 50 on a better angle[/quote]From the laws of football


The free kick is awarded at the spot where the kick or handpass lands or is first possessed, to the nearest player to the spot (unless the disposal is backwards, or the ball lands out of bounds or through for a behind, in which case the free kick is awarded to the infringed player at the spot of the infringement"

The umpire should never be allowed to umpire another game[/quote]

That was always my understanding to

[Bum Crack]

I can't see any possible reason why Jonas wasn't on Hawkins by the 10 minute mark.
Clearly a poor match up, especially the way Geelong got the 1 on 1 they wanted.
Smashed Clurey's confidence for the whole game.
Didn't have an extra intercept defender either.
Kenny keeping his powder dry for when it really counts I think.

THink youre giving Ken too much credit

Its a blatantly obvious matchup.
Well when and if they play each other again we'll know.
If clurey starts on him again then Kenny's history.

He would have dominated Jonas too. That was rare form last night. He would have beaten anyone.

[LMA]

I can't see any possible reason why Jonas wasn't on Hawkins by the 10 minute mark.
Clearly a poor match up, especially the way Geelong got the 1 on 1 they wanted.
Smashed Clurey's confidence for the whole game.
Didn't have an extra intercept defender either.
Kenny keeping his powder dry for when it really counts I think.

THink youre giving Ken too much credit

Its a blatantly obvious matchup.
Well when and if they play each other again we'll know.
If clurey starts on him again then Kenny's history.

He would have dominated Jonas too. That was rare form last night. He would have beaten anyone.

Jonas was impressive today...........at Largs Reserve

[LaughingKookaburra]

Was Jonas at Largs reserve watching Pt Districts?

[LMA]

Was Jonas at Largs reserve watching Pt Districts?

Could have been, but his Bro killed us for ROCS.

[Wedgie]

That was always my understanding to

They showed the actual AFL rule on the Sunday Footy show and the umpire was spot on, its taken from in play closest to where it lands out of play.
There was conjecture was whether it was a FAD or not and it looked like it was correct to me, Brayshaw should have tried to smother it instead of playing the man.
The only obvious error was who took the kick.

[Kahuna]

That was always my understanding to

They showed the actual AFL rule on the Sunday Footy show and the umpire was spot on, its taken from in play closest to where it lands out of play.

How did they explain it Wedgie? Rule as quoted in post above seems pretty clear.

[Jim05]

That was always my understanding to

They showed the actual AFL rule on the Sunday Footy show and the umpire was spot on, its taken from in play closest to where it lands out of play.
There was conjecture was whether it was a FAD or not and it looked like it was correct to me, Brayshaw should have tried to smother it instead of playing the man.
The only obvious error was who took the kick.

Yep, seems as though that is correct which therefore begs the question of why the two weren’t paid correctly to Fremantle minutes earlier. The one to Conca was worse and was brought back to the HBF when it clearly went OOTF on the wing

[Wedgie]

That was always my understanding to

They showed the actual AFL rule on the Sunday Footy show and the umpire was spot on, its taken from in play closest to where it lands out of play.

How did they explain it Wedgie? Rule as quoted in post above seems pretty clear.

They quoted the law (printed it on the screen), I assume the AFL is different or the above rule is outdated.

[amber_fluid]

That was always my understanding to

They showed the actual AFL rule on the Sunday Footy show and the umpire was spot on, its taken from in play closest to where it lands out of play.

How did they explain it Wedgie? Rule as quoted in post above seems pretty clear.

The kick is from where the ball crossed the boundary line.
Umpire got it right.