Were Mike and Sasha separated or divorced at the time - they seem to be still spoken of as a couple by acquaintances? The article in the above link says:
Mr Phillips sent several letters to Mr Rann and his wife in 2004-05, blaming the Premier for the break-up of his marriage to Ms Chantelois.
dedja wrote:So a bloke who's not married indulges in a little fornication ... hands up who's guilty of the same offence?
if there was nothing wrong with it he should have come clean instead of trying weasel out of it like the slime bag he is
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
20-50 years ago then absolutely he would have been gone.
But times have changed and people are more relaxed about this sort of stuff. It hasn't really done Bill Clinton much harm in the long run. In some quarters it improved his popularity
It will really depend on the exact circumstances but, in reality, this issue has been played out in the media ever since the incident at the Wine Centre and it doesn't seem to have put a dent in the opinion polls so far. They would have assumed she would eventually sell her story so they would be prepared for it.
This is all on the assumption that Rann himself doesn't choose to resign. I just can't see that he will.
Rann wasn't married at "the time" but was certainly in a relationship with the future Mrs Rann. She apparently knew all about it but "had not expressed any concerns about it"???????? A partner with flower power values - hard to find
Dead man working with the female vote.......
Interesting The Advertiser could only find room on Page 7 whereas it made front page in The Australian. Is the editor of The Advertiser scared of the backlash from the SA Labor Govt propoganda machine?
Jimmy_041 wrote:Rann wasn't married at "the time" but was certainly in a relationship with the future Mrs Rann. She apparently knew all about it but "had not expressed any concerns about it"???????? A partner with flower power values - hard to find
Dead man working with the female vote.......
Interesting The Advertiser could only find room on Page 7 whereas it made front page in The Australian. Is the editor of The Advertiser scared of the backlash from the SA Labor Govt propoganda machine?
Only rusted on Liberal voters give a shit about this story, for obvious reasons, any port in a storm and all that. I've never been a fan of Rann but what's it got to with his ability to do his job? And yeah there would be a reason why The Australian would choose to put this 'revelation' on it's front page but I'd hardly expect you to work it out.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
Gozu wrote:Only rusted on Liberal voters give a s***t about this story
I think you would find a few Labour voters will be now ..."giving a s**t" Gozu......
A few sure, but it's the staunch Liberal voters desperately trying to cling to this. Surely you don't think Labor aren't going to romp it in again next election?
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis