Smashed Crab wrote:If Voges gets 140 odd not out he will have an Test career average over 100.
think the magic no. is 173
Smashed Crab wrote:If Voges gets 140 odd not out he will have an Test career average over 100.
stampy wrote:goin off on talkback kiwi radio about that no ball
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Jim05 wrote:How the hell doesn't Nevill bat ahead of Marsh?
Yep.
Are we better off picking another batsman at 6?
Does Marsh's value as a bowler trump this?
I think in our current state a batting all-rounder is the preferred choice. However, if Nevill can develop himself into a very solid wicket keeper/batsman then we could have the luxury of picking an extra bowling option perhaps.
Personally I would prefer Nevill bat at 7 because the 6 above him are performing.
Grahaml wrote:Long term he can't perform this way with the bat and stay in the side IMHO. We need someone who averages minimum 40 batting at 6. If somehow we had a genuine keeper doing that, he could bat 7. Would still be below par, but not so far we couldn't afford it. But no keeper I know of is close to that (or not really a keeper) and he wouldn't command a spot as a front line bowler to bat 8. No doubt it's handy to have a strong bowling option, but 4 main bowlers shouldn't need that much support. An attack of Starc, Pattinson/Cummins, Hazlewood and Lyon should manage 90 overs between them in a day and I think that would be the most aggressive line up we could muster.
Personally, I don't think he's got the ability with the bat. Will be a valuable all rounder in the short forms, but I think he'll get dropped before long from the test side and won't produce enough at shield level to force a return. For now, he's being hidden with Warner, Khawaja, Smith and Voges dominating and Joe Burns doing a good job. But Voges probably has 12 months left, Smith already showing signs that his form is wavering and Khawaja won't be neglecting the inner and outer portions of his blade forever.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:The rate our bowlers seem to breakdown our number 6 needs to be able to bowl otherwise we will be in huge trouble at times
300 lead now
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
bennymacca wrote:Grahaml wrote:Long term he can't perform this way with the bat and stay in the side IMHO. We need someone who averages minimum 40 batting at 6. If somehow we had a genuine keeper doing that, he could bat 7. Would still be below par, but not so far we couldn't afford it. But no keeper I know of is close to that (or not really a keeper) and he wouldn't command a spot as a front line bowler to bat 8. No doubt it's handy to have a strong bowling option, but 4 main bowlers shouldn't need that much support. An attack of Starc, Pattinson/Cummins, Hazlewood and Lyon should manage 90 overs between them in a day and I think that would be the most aggressive line up we could muster.
Personally, I don't think he's got the ability with the bat. Will be a valuable all rounder in the short forms, but I think he'll get dropped before long from the test side and won't produce enough at shield level to force a return. For now, he's being hidden with Warner, Khawaja, Smith and Voges dominating and Joe Burns doing a good job. But Voges probably has 12 months left, Smith already showing signs that his form is wavering and Khawaja won't be neglecting the inner and outer portions of his blade forever.
not too many number 6s in world cricket that average 40
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests