Abbott/Liberal Govt Watch

[Jimmy_041]

Larvatus Prodeo. A self-admitted left-leaning, but prominent and well-respected blog.

The article I posted is factual content.

any evidence to back that up?

Probably only respected by like minded "left-leaning" readers

[Q.]

Larvatus Prodeo. A self-admitted left-leaning, but prominent and well-respected blog.

The article I posted is factual content.

any evidence to back that up?

Probably only respected by like minded "left-leaning" readers

Probably.

It's not a blog I would quote opinion pieces from, but I linked to that particular article for it's factual content.

[Sky Pilot]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

[Gozu]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Newspaper columnists, awesome.

[Sky Pilot]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Newspaper columnists, awesome.

Yeah I couldn't believe my luck when I stumbled onto this rich source of information. It has just reinforced what I thought all along, there's a lot of pratts out there so you have to be aware.

[straight talker]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Newspaper columnists, awesome.

what would you call garnaut,gore and flannery apart from a laughing stock? newspaper columnists would probably have more of an idea than them thats for sure.

[fish]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Thanks SP but I meant examples of the stuff highlighted in bold above.

[fish]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Thanks SP but I meant examples of the stuff highlighted in bold above.

Struggling SP?

[Q.]

Anyone game enough to read Susan Mitchell's A Man's Man?

[pels]

Anyone game enough to read Susan Mitchell's A Man's Man?

Heard her on Hack the other day on Triple J and she didn't hold back.
Would be a very interesting read, we all should be very afraid.

[fish]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

No facts or examples yet.

I'm beginning to think you just made it all up!

[Jimmy_041]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Thanks SP but I meant examples of the stuff highlighted in bold above.

Why do I keep thinking back to Y2k?

The last time the scientific world said the sky was going to fall down

[Q.]

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Thanks SP but I meant examples of the stuff highlighted in bold above.

Why do I keep thinking back to Y2k?

The last time the scientific world said the sky was going to fall down

There were published articles in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals discussing such?

[straight talker]

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Thanks SP but I meant examples of the stuff highlighted in bold above.

Why do I keep thinking back to Y2k?

The last time the scientific world said the sky was going to fall down

There were published articles in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals discussing such?

how bout flannery,garnaut and gore i mean they all said the dams would be empty high rise buildings would be engulfed by the rising sea level etc: they must of been getting their information from there scientist friends surely? What a JOKE.

[Jimmy_041]

I watch Fox News remember?
(Dr)Peter Van Onsolen, (Dr)Greg O'Mahoney, Paul Murray, Paul Murphy, Joe Hildebrand and commentators of this quality who are backed up by research assistants and other resources regularly spout off about doubts in the science surrounding this dodgy sham. I'm with them without having to read a single boring science report. Woo Hoo!

Thanks SP but I meant examples of the stuff highlighted in bold above.

Why do I keep thinking back to Y2k?

The last time the scientific world said the sky was going to fall down

There were published articles in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals discussing such?

As I recall, it was the hit of the late 90's

Anything to get extra research funding?

[Q.]

Why do I keep thinking back to Y2k?

The last time the scientific world said the sky was going to fall down

There were published articles in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals discussing such?

As I recall, it was the hit of the late 90's

Anything to get extra research funding?

It was memetic, but hardly something that consumed scientific research.

[fish]

how bout flannery,garnaut and gore i mean they all said the dams would be empty high rise buildings would be engulfed by the rising sea level etc: they must of been getting their information from there scientist friends surely? What a JOKE.

Where and when did they say this?

[straight talker]

how bout flannery,garnaut and gore i mean they all said the dams would be empty high rise buildings would be engulfed by the rising sea level etc: they must of been getting their information from there scientist friends surely? What a JOKE.

Where and when did they say this?

in there spin sessions. i am not going to go back over their phony predictions to cut and paste for you to understand they are peanuts. you do the research then get back to me when you have found it.

[Sky Pilot]

I don't denounce science - just the whole climate change sham. I firmly believe it is tainted with self interest, corruption, industrial espionage and interest. The science varies from country to country and whose vested interest has the most to lose or gain.

Thats a nice opinion SP got any facts or examples to back it up?

No facts or examples yet.

I'm beginning to think you just made it all up!

Fish I think you are wasting your time doing whatever it is you do to earn a living. You should be a comedy script writer.

[fish]

how bout flannery,garnaut and gore i mean they all said the dams would be empty high rise buildings would be engulfed by the rising sea level etc: they must of been getting their information from there scientist friends surely? What a JOKE.

Where and when did they say this?

in there spin sessions. i am not going to go back over their phony predictions to cut and paste for you to understand they are peanuts. you do the research then get back to me when you have found it.

I reckon you made it up - that's why you can't back it up with any evidence.

We might have to start calling you straight porkies!

The question is: if these guys are so bad why do you need to resort to lying to try to discredit them?