Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14/9)

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by johntheclaret »

dedja wrote:There could be an argument for a comma after 'site', but otherwise perfect.

I didn't want to be pedantic. You know how touchy he gets.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Team: Central District
Location: On the prairie
Has thanked: 381 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by Apachebulldog »

kickinit wrote:
maccad wrote:
kickinit wrote:
maccad wrote:very disappointed with the power reserves winning today, could have handled losing to south (not that I think we will lose to the power reserves) but having to sit with one club supporters going on about where is your team in the afl and not hearing any smart ass comments out of them until they start kicking goals. It will make the win sweeter beating PP reserves but boy it will be unbearable if we were to lose watching all that teal blue celebrating their first magpies game in 15 years. Hopefully I am surrounded by norwood supporter and don't have to get in any arguments with power supporters.


You'll be happy then that your playing PORT ADELAIDE MAGPIES next week then


17 Power listed players wearing a magpies jumper does not make them magpies. In 3 weeks time 7 of them will told see you later.


Being a power listed player also does not make the team Port Power. The thing that decides what they are called is what the team name is. As much as you must hate it, PAFC team in the SANFL is PORT ADELAIDE MAGPIES.



KRAKIT he is back with words of knowledge and wisdom apparently South did not play against the AFL POWER RESERVES today.

Gee you really one hell of an intelligent individual !!!!!
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
Brendan M
Rookie
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:19 am
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by Brendan M »

The rise of South (and Sturt) is the highlight of 2014. Great work from both clubs. Great work also from RPH commentators in their post-game conclusions yesterday. The kind of straight-talking that only an independent media can provide - long live community radio.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by whufc »

Brendan M wrote:The rise of South (and Sturt) is the highlight of 2014. Great work from both clubs. Great work also from RPH commentators in their post-game conclusions yesterday. The kind of straight-talking that only an independent media can provide - long live community radio.


What did rph say
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Brendan M
Rookie
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:19 am
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by Brendan M »

Each of them (was Daryl S, Dion - the ex umpire, John N - I may have their names wrong) commented separately that the consequences of introducing AFL are profound, that the short to long term impacts are and will be damaging to the SANFL and that the local clubs are extremely disadvantaged by the new arrangements.
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by JK »

Brendan M wrote:Each of them (was Daryl S, Dion - the ex umpire, John N - I may have their names wrong) commented separately that the consequences of introducing AFL are profound, that the short to long term impacts are and will be damaging to the SANFL and that the local clubs are extremely disadvantaged by the new arrangements.


Was in total contrast to the attitude of the AA commentators. I know that will come as a surprise to many.
FUSC
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by heater31 »

JK wrote:
Brendan M wrote:Each of them (was Daryl S, Dion - the ex umpire, John N - I may have their names wrong) commented separately that the consequences of introducing AFL are profound, that the short to long term impacts are and will be damaging to the SANFL and that the local clubs are extremely disadvantaged by the new arrangements.


Was in total contrast to the attitude of the AA commentators. I know that will come as a surprise to many.


Wouldn't expect anything less.....
User avatar
darley16
Under 18s
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 10:07 am
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 232 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by darley16 »

Very proud of my football club both on and off the field, we have been proven to be morally correct in voting no against AFL reserves and we have lifted our status and respect throughout the SANFL as a well managed, stable club with a group of committed team oriented footballers. We were beaten not the Port Magpies as we once knew them, we played Port Adelaide FC now the Power an AFL club, they must mothball their old striped jumper and wear the teal, this misrepresentation of the truth is fooling no one except maybe themselves. They boost loudly they are one club, one club doesn't have two different colours, known by two different names, wear different jumper designs, have two different club songs, two different club logo's.
User avatar
wild dog
Under 18s
Posts: 552
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: Smithfield
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 180 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by wild dog »

southee wrote:
kickinit wrote:
RB wrote:
kickinit wrote:The thing that decides what they are called is what the team name is.

At only the most superficial of levels. You can call your dog a horse; it's still a dog.


That is correct, you can call the magpies the power, but we are still the magpies.


So is that why your cheer squad were chanting "power" at the game ?


I thought I could hear that on the LifeFM call. Was it the (think Ceeeeentrallls) Poweeerrrr chant. :lol:
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 4:14 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Hectorville
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by Rising Power »

darley16 wrote:Very proud of my football club both on and off the field, we have been proven to be morally correct in voting no against AFL reserves and we have lifted our status and respect throughout the SANFL as a well managed, stable club with a group of committed team oriented footballers. We were beaten not the Port Magpies as we once knew them, we played Port Adelaide FC now the Power an AFL club, they must mothball their old striped jumper and wear the teal, this misrepresentation of the truth is fooling no one except maybe themselves. They boost loudly they are one club, one club doesn't have two different colours, known by two different names, wear different jumper designs, have two different club songs, two different club logo's.

If wearing teal and singing the power song will make you and your club feel better about the AFL reserves playing in the SANFL league competition then I'm all for the change.
User avatar
darley16
Under 18s
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 10:07 am
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 232 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by darley16 »

Yes it will, slightly because it is a true reflection of what and who the club is and what it is not.
User avatar
PhilH
League - Top 5
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 11:04 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Happy Valley
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 163 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by PhilH »

RPH yesterday was Darryl Smith, Don Cooper & Phil Aspinall

LifeFM yesterday were Doug Oakley, John Nankivell and Andrew Marks
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by topsywaldron »

Surprised Chris Kendall couldn't make it onto any panel. Usually knows his stuff and manages not to talk about himself or the club he supports while doing so.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
footywise
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 3:02 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by footywise »

darley16 wrote:Very proud of my football club both on and off the field, we have been proven to be morally correct in voting no against AFL reserves and we have lifted our status and respect throughout the SANFL as a well managed, stable club with a group of committed team oriented footballers. We were beaten not the Port Magpies as we once knew them, we played Port Adelaide FC now the Power an AFL club, they must mothball their old striped jumper and wear the teal, this misrepresentation of the truth is fooling no one except maybe themselves. They boost loudly they are one club, one club doesn't have two different colours, known by two different names, wear different jumper designs, have two different club songs, two different club logo's.

Im very proud too but am disappointed at the some of our supporters carrying on
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 4:14 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Hectorville
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by Rising Power »

No comments on ex-Port Adelaide SANFL player and AFL assistant coach Brad Gotch's remarks at 3 quarter time? Something along the lines of a "piss-weak effort".

I'd be hoping the South players aren't sitting back thinking "woe is me, the ONLY reason we only lost is because the opposition are full-time professionals". Didn't seem to impact Norwood too much last week.
Last edited by Rising Power on Mon Sep 15, 2014 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26503
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:10 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1101 times
Been thanked: 2075 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by dedja »

It's a valid point I hate to admit. These off-field issues shouldn't and don't have a bearing on-field.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
footywise
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 3:02 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by footywise »

Rising Power wrote:No comments on ex-Port Adelaide SANFL player and AFL assistant coach Brad Gotch's remarks at 3 quarter time? Something along the lines of a "piss-weak effort".

I'd be hoping the South players aren't sitting back thinking "woe is me, the ONLY reason we only lost is because the opposition are full-time professionals". Didn't seem to impact Norwood too much last week.

...
Last edited by footywise on Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rising Power
Under 16s
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 4:14 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Hectorville
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by Rising Power »

darley16 wrote:Yes it will, slightly because it is a true reflection of what and who the club is and what it is not.

And opposition supporters who hate the club are clearly the most appropriate people to tell Port supporters what the club is and what it is not. Please go ahead and orchestrate any changes as necessary.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:42 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Has thanked: 539 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by heater31 »

Rising Power wrote:No comments on ex-Port Adelaide SANFL player and AFL assistant coach Brad Gotch's remarks at 3 quarter time? Something along the lines of a "piss-weak effort".

I'd be hoping the South players aren't sitting back thinking "woe is me, the ONLY reason we only lost is because the opposition are full-time professionals". Didn't seem to impact Norwood too much last week.



It was that effort that cost them the game....a group of part time professional footballers were beating a bunch of pampered professionals being paid 10 times as much to play the same game :shock:
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Team: Collingwood
Team: Kenilworth
Location: Craven Cottage
Has thanked: 541 times
Been thanked: 326 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final - Port v South @ Adelaide Oval (Sun 14

Post by LPH »

Rising Power wrote:No comments on ex-Port Adelaide SANFL player and AFL assistant coach Brad Gotch's remarks at 3 quarter time? Something along the lines of a "piss-weak effort".

I'd be hoping the South players aren't sitting back thinking "woe is me, the ONLY reason we only lost is because the opposition are full-time professionals". Didn't seem to impact Norwood too much last week.


My recollection of the comments were as follows:

Rhett Biglands was interviewing him as they exited the playing surface, after the 3/4 address.
Gotch was asked about Port's dominance of the quarter & the fact that the mid-field failed to stop Port's 'run'.
His response was one of candor & completely understandable, given the context;
"Our midfield was piss poor & its about time they stood up, otherwise the season is over..."

Seems reasonable to me.
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 324 guests