Preliminary Final

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16430
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:18 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by amber_fluid »

Jim05 wrote:
another grub wrote:Why is it a disgrace?

If you can’t pick it up during the game then bad luck. Retrospectively stripping a game is pure garbage IMO


Agree.
There is no way they can give the win to the Eagles.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
rocketeer
Rookie
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:02 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide University
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by rocketeer »

I bet the SANFL are torn, they will desperately want North in the grand final for the crowd, but then they might have to admit that their officials did a far from stellar job monitoring the interchange.
knowledge
Rookie
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:41 am
Team: Sturt
Team: North Melbourne
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 81 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by knowledge »

WTF!! 5 minutes. Surely, it’s not hard. 18 on the field and 3 on the pine! What was the North interchange official doing? Must be dyslexic!
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
Posts: 14140
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:35 am
Team: Norwood
Been thanked: 686 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Gozu »

Jim05 wrote:
another grub wrote:Why is it a disgrace?

If you can’t pick it up during the game then bad luck. Retrospectively stripping a game is pure garbage IMO


Agreed 100%, it was something that needed to be picked up and dealt with then and there you can't go stripping a team of a win after a game.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by therisingblues »

amber_fluid wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
another grub wrote:Why is it a disgrace?

If you can’t pick it up during the game then bad luck. Retrospectively stripping a game is pure garbage IMO


Agree.
There is no way they can give the win to the Eagles.

Agreed here also.
I hear there was a game in the 50's involving the Eagles, and someone else. Torrens had an extra player on the ground, and it DID get icked up during the game.
When the players lined up for the count, one of the Torrens players jumped over the fence and the fact they had 19 on the field went undiscovered.
Then there was the AFL game in Tassie, where the umpire did not hear the siren, then the side that was down kicked a goal, well after the siren, and the wiwn was allowed, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
I think the precedent has been set. If it is not picked up during the game, too late! You cannot cahnge the rules now.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
Posts: 14140
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:35 am
Team: Norwood
Been thanked: 686 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Gozu »

knowledge wrote:What was the North interchange official doing? Must be dyslexic!


Looking the other way as Josh Carr ran out onto the ground whilst pulling a knuckle duster out of his sock ;)
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
saintal
Coach
Posts: 5887
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:31 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: St Kilda
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has thanked: 379 times
Been thanked: 488 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by saintal »

Great game!

Surely cant overturn the result though..
SAFC- 62 years...
StKFC- 60 years..
User avatar
Robran
League - Best 21
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:31 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 189 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Robran »

This happens more than we all think nothing will happen roosters play in the GF next week. If I was the coach of the eagles I would be saying no way were rocking up next week If decision was over turned.
GO THE COCKS
The mighty cocks 2018 premiers
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Jim05 »

The NEAFL today had a similar outcome in their GF. Southport won by 10 goals but during the game they did a head count and awarded a free to the opposition only
Computer Crashed
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:34 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Moonta
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Computer Crashed »

saintal wrote:Great game!

Surely cant overturn the result though..

Terrific game i agree, glad i was at the ground to witness it.
Eagles look no match for Norwood after today buy a week is a long time in footy.
Whether or not this gets turned over will be interesting, i give North a massive chance of winning next week if they go through.
8 pts made a hell of a difference at the end of the day.
Computer Crashed
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:34 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Moonta
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Computer Crashed »

Jim05 wrote:The NEAFL today had a similar outcome in their GF. Southport won by 10 goals but during the game they did a head count and awarded a free to the opposition only

Thanks for sharing.
User avatar
another grub
Coach
Posts: 16883
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:02 am
Has thanked: 4008 times
Been thanked: 1841 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by another grub »

Awarded a free? Wtf. The penalty has to match the crime JimIMHO
These outdated player count and score wiped is BS. A commission should sit and decide it.
5 mins is too long to just sweep it under the carpet.
mal wrote: I like to think of us as an allied team
MAY-Z
2008 Punting Comp Winner
Posts: 1151
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:07 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by MAY-Z »

therisingblues wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
another grub wrote:Why is it a disgrace?

If you can’t pick it up during the game then bad luck. Retrospectively stripping a game is pure garbage IMO


Agree.
There is no way they can give the win to the Eagles.

Agreed here also.
I hear there was a game in the 50's involving the Eagles, and someone else. Torrens had an extra player on the ground, and it DID get icked up during the game.
When the players lined up for the count, one of the Torrens players jumped over the fence and the fact they had 19 on the field went undiscovered.
Then there was the AFL game in Tassie, where the umpire did not hear the siren, then the side that was down kicked a goal, well after the siren, and the wiwn was allowed, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
I think the precedent has been set. If it is not picked up during the game, too late! You cannot cahnge the rules now.


Thats incorrect re the AFL game

the result was changed 4 days later by the AFL commission , to revert the scores back to when the timekeeper thought the game should end as opposed to when the umpires ended the game.

Whichever decision is made here it will clearly be unfair to the team that is ruled against
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51623
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5259 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Brodlach »

Reports that the Eagles talked to a SANFL offical about North having too many players on and nothing was done
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods

2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Mr Fuller
Reserves
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:16 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 135 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Mr Fuller »

Wolf Pack wrote:The Eagles need a new coach
No point making the finals year after year and doing nothing.
47 points up today!!!
Absolutely Piss Weak
They have played finals for the last 7 years and have done stuff all!!!


Wolf Pack – I cannot agree more.

I am simply fed up with this club. No doubt we will roll up in 12 months time in much the same fashion finishing top 3. We will be outworked and outplayed by a more determined team and we will hear the same tired excuses.

Well I am sick of this. Godden – you must go. You’ve done absolutely nothing to progress this club and the game plan you employ does NOT stack up during finals.

You keep persisting with a midfield of plodders who cannot match it with the rest of the competition. You keep selecting a bunch of players who cannot kick the footy long, low and fast but rather kick scrubby little chip passes. Our team is stacked with frail bodies – Hall, Johansen, Boyd, Haylock – to name just a few who cannot be relied upon to go in hard during finals footy.

The entire team is inflicted with self-doubt that has been left untreated for so long it is now not curable. I wrote last year and I repeat. Every single club that comes up against us in the finals – no matter how far behind they may be – knows that there is a good chance we will choke. And that is a dangerous spot for us to be in.

We know Godden won’t make any wholesale changes. He never does. And we will hear the same BS messages about how he is so frustrated etc. So I’m sorry, you must go.

As far as next week, it is difficult to know how North will go. Did they show how dominant they can be? Or did they come up against a mental head-case that allowed them to get over the line? Clearly, if there was any other team in the competition playing today North would not have been allowed to get back into the game. Certainly Norwood won’t fold like this p!ssweak club.

I’m predicting Norwood will do it fairly easily by around 5 goals or so. From afar, one thing that would be great to see is if Ryswyck can make it make into the team. It would be a great reward for a stellar career. With North a bit banged up from today there might be a few spots for grabs so who knows?
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Booney »

Going to get juicy, isn't it?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
the joker
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4687
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 3:09 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by the joker »

North win. Game not overturned


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I love vegatarian food. It goes great with steak.
User avatar
another grub
Coach
Posts: 16883
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:02 am
Has thanked: 4008 times
Been thanked: 1841 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by another grub »

Whats everyone think 5 mins with an extra player is worth? Whats a fair score deduction? Give us a score.

I say 6 pts
Last edited by another grub on Sun Sep 16, 2018 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mal wrote: I like to think of us as an allied team
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29218
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by whufc »

They can’t take the game of North now

But I do like the idea of whatever a team scored while having the extra player on the park is deducted if found in retrospect. I would have no problem if they implemented the rule for next season.

It’s a pretty big advantage to have an extra player in the faster paced modern football with teams pick gaps and holes in the opposition rather than the old school days of kicking long to a contested pack
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Final teams.

Post by Jim05 »

the joker wrote:North win. Game not overturned


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The SANFL has ruled on it already?
I thought they would atleast pretend they were looking into it
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 196 guests