Rules for www.safooty.net
-
The Big Shrek
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
- Has thanked: 38 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
.
- Attachments
-
- FC2.jpg (21.96 KiB) Viewed 8282 times
Last edited by The Big Shrek on Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
The Big Shrek
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:13 pm
- Has thanked: 38 times
- Been thanked: 375 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Good work Pup! The FC likes to take things a little too seriously.
Hey FC, telling people they have no idea!
Hey FC, telling people they have no idea!
- Attachments
-
- FC2.jpg (21.96 KiB) Viewed 8276 times
- Pup
- Veteran
- Posts: 3591
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:09 am
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: West Coast Eagles
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Footy Chick wrote:I think you'll find my post is justified and you have no idea.![]()
Ok my mistake.
A simple i do know what he meant and its personal would have been enough i would have thought rather than the roll of the eyes and the no idea comment.
You sunk my Scrabbleship
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15661
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1407 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
The Big Shrek wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Post offenders...![]()
Whom is the worst tool of the site..?
Jimmy_041
Cheers mate.
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:55 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Wedgie wrote:We don't normally allow the bumping of posts but there may be a few on here that aren't aware of the rules of this site so...
I can understand the reasoning behind most of the rules but I don't get what's so wrong about bumping posts. A while ago I posted that the Kat would be our next test opener and I can't see the harm in adding to an old thread with new comments as that topic becomes..er..topical again. Surely that creates less work for mods than multiple threads on the same subject.
regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:55 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
btw, just like to say to all the mods that you are doing a top job and that this site is the best moderated forum of the many that I post on.
regards,
REB
regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51723
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Rik E Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:We don't normally allow the bumping of posts but there may be a few on here that aren't aware of the rules of this site so...
I can understand the reasoning behind most of the rules but I don't get what's so wrong about bumping posts. A while ago I posted that the Kat would be our next test opener and I can't see the harm in adding to an old thread with new comments as that topic becomes..er..topical again. Surely that creates less work for mods than multiple threads on the same subject.
regards,
REB
Because you get the occasional clown on here who might just want to have their name us "Last post by...." and flood the board with all topics with current topics getting shafted down the page or onto the next one.
Its a common sense thing though hence why I said "We don't normally..."
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
- Wedgie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 51723
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Noarlunga
- Has thanked: 2153 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Rik E Boy wrote:btw, just like to say to all the mods that you are doing a top job and that this site is the best moderated forum of the many that I post on.
regards,
REB
The Mods do do a great job, Im very grateful to them.
We tend to get more positive feedback than negative (and the negative feedback is usually from dills) and the growth of the site is testament to the great job they do.
Well done Mods!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15661
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1407 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Wedgie wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:btw, just like to say to all the mods that you are doing a top job and that this site is the best moderated forum of the many that I post on.
regards,
REB
The Mods do do a great job, Im very grateful to them.
We tend to get more positive feedback than negative (and the negative feedback is usually from dills) and the growth of the site is testament to the great job they do.
Well done Mods!
e.g. see posts further up the page
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:55 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Wedgie wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Wedgie wrote:We don't normally allow the bumping of posts but there may be a few on here that aren't aware of the rules of this site so...
I can understand the reasoning behind most of the rules but I don't get what's so wrong about bumping posts. A while ago I posted that the Kat would be our next test opener and I can't see the harm in adding to an old thread with new comments as that topic becomes..er..topical again. Surely that creates less work for mods than multiple threads on the same subject.
regards,
REB
Because you get the occasional clown on here who might just want to have their name us "Last post by...." and flood the board with all topics with current topics getting shafted down the page or onto the next one.
Its a common sense thing though hence why I said "We don't normally..."
Ah! Elementary my dear Wedgie! *penny drops*
regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
- A Mum
- Coach
- Posts: 10111
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:32 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Contact:
- CENTURION
- Coach
- Posts: 11377
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Salisbury
- Location: Burnside, 5066
- Has thanked: 341 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
what's wrong with mentioning premature ejaculation?
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
- Q.
- Coach
- Posts: 22019
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Houghton Districts
- Location: El Dorado
- Has thanked: 970 times
- Been thanked: 2397 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
CENTURION wrote:what's wrong with mentioning premature ejaculation?
In the Jokes thread or a Game Review thread?
- dedja
- Coach
- Posts: 26503
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:10 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Has thanked: 1101 times
- Been thanked: 2075 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
CENTURION wrote:what's wrong with mentioning premature ejaculation?
only a problem if you walk the talk ...
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- Dutchy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 47486
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Location: Location, Location
- Has thanked: 2936 times
- Been thanked: 4838 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
CENTURION wrote:what's wrong with mentioning premature ejaculation?
Take your pick....
Wedgie wrote:
- material which is obscene or offensive or links to sites/pages that are obscene or offensive. This includes material that is sexually explicit, shows violence or gore, or is otherwise offensive as determined by the moderators.
- nonsense posts or vandalism, this includes any posts that the moderators or Site Admin deem to be making this site look unprofessional.
- troll posts (posts intended to be offensive or ignorant, setting off a large and pointless argument)
If a topic in the moderators/admin's opinion will just promote the same posts, the same arguments as a previous post or is just rehashing a previous topic (especially a topic that's been deleted already) it will be deleted or locked.
- any of the above rules are all sujbect to the no 1 rule: Site Admin and moderators reserve the right to edit or delete any post as they see fit, rest assured if a moderator is seen to be abusing his position a warning will be issued and further abuse of their status may result in them being stripped of that status. If Im seen to be abusing my position as Site Admin then advise me of your opinion and if a majority of users agree with you we will see if someone else can take over the job.
- CENTURION
- Coach
- Posts: 11377
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Salisbury
- Location: Burnside, 5066
- Has thanked: 341 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Dutchy wrote:CENTURION wrote:what's wrong with mentioning premature ejaculation?
Take your pick....Wedgie wrote:
- material which is obscene or offensive or links to sites/pages that are obscene or offensive. This includes material that is sexually explicit, shows violence or gore, or is otherwise offensive as determined by the moderators.
- nonsense posts or vandalism, this includes any posts that the moderators or Site Admin deem to be making this site look unprofessional.
- troll posts (posts intended to be offensive or ignorant, setting off a large and pointless argument)
If a topic in the moderators/admin's opinion will just promote the same posts, the same arguments as a previous post or is just rehashing a previous topic (especially a topic that's been deleted already) it will be deleted or locked.
- any of the above rules are all sujbect to the no 1 rule: Site Admin and moderators reserve the right to edit or delete any post as they see fit, rest assured if a moderator is seen to be abusing his position a warning will be issued and further abuse of their status may result in them being stripped of that status. If Im seen to be abusing my position as Site Admin then advise me of your opinion and if a majority of users agree with you we will see if someone else can take over the job.
well, it's certainly not obscene or offensive, a lot of posts are nonsense, so ban them all!! and i don't think it was trolling, I just made a witty observation. and people laughed.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
- CENTURION
- Coach
- Posts: 11377
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Salisbury
- Location: Burnside, 5066
- Has thanked: 341 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Maybe if it wasn't about Glenelg? Hmmm???
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
- CENTURION
- Coach
- Posts: 11377
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Western Bulldogs
- Team: Salisbury
- Location: Burnside, 5066
- Has thanked: 341 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules for www.safooty.net
Quichey wrote:CENTURION wrote:what's wrong with mentioning premature ejaculation?
In the Jokes thread or a Game Review thread?
it was in the game review thread.
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


