R10 West v Port @ Richmond

All discussions to do with the SANFL
matt35
Under 18s
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:50 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Boston
Location: Darwin
Has thanked: 513 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by matt35 »

Too many key outs for West today. By comes at a good time for them.
No Surrender!
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by Jim05 »

mal wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
blood bath wrote:Tuck and Green late omissions for west, joining Nelson and Ezard as outs from last week.

Johnson and Hampton to debut with Newell playing his first game for the year

Must be missing at least 12 first choice players today


Port have at least 22 first choice players missing every week

Yet still have a playing list worth 3 times the size of West's whole salary cap
User avatar
saintal
Coach
Posts: 5887
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:31 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: St Kilda
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has thanked: 379 times
Been thanked: 488 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by saintal »

Port spent the half time break out in the middle. Apparently they complained that the change-rooms were too small..?

Too many assistant coaches/statisticians/lackies etc.
SAFC- 62 years...
StKFC- 60 years..
philcas
Rookie
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:26 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Athelstone
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 21 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by philcas »

i hope kids still had to.have a kick on the oval
i would have thought westies would have given up their larger change rooms
if i was their a few kicks might have accidently entered the players area
i hope they try & do that at the parade later in the year. it should make some intetesting
confrontations
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by therisingblues »

saintal wrote:Port spent the half time break out in the middle. Apparently they complained that the change-rooms were too small..?

Too many assistant coaches/statisticians/lackies etc.

I thought they'd finally had enough of the lack of hair dryers available at SANFL grounds.
That's what I heard anyway.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by RustyCage »

With the Academy players, the AFL players and other club people there yesterday, Port decided that it would be a bit of a tight fit to have everyone in the change rooms, so decided to stay out on the ground at half time. They weren't interfering with the mini league or the kick and a catch, completely a non issue. Was great to be out there mingling with players and coaches, hearing what they were saying, and hearing some Academy players ripping into Mark Clayton who was getting his calves massaged.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
Blacky
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1049
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 6:31 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon
Team: Morphettville Park
Location: Front bar at WESTIES
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 54 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by Blacky »

RustyCage wrote:With the Academy players, the AFL players and other club people there yesterday, Port decided that it would be a bit of a tight fit to have everyone in the change rooms, so decided to stay out on the ground at half time. They weren't interfering with the mini league or the kick and a catch, completely a non issue. Was great to be out there mingling with players and coaches, hearing what they were saying, and hearing some Academy players ripping into Mark Clayton who was getting his calves massaged.

have a look at visitors room at alberton even smaller
Current image:
Maximum dimensions; width: 100 pixels, height: 100 pixels, file size: 20.51 KiB
The avatar functionality is currently DISABLED.
Bounce of the ball
Reserves
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:10 am
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 65 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by Bounce of the ball »

RustyCage wrote:With the Academy players, the AFL players and other club people there yesterday, Port decided that it would be a bit of a tight fit to have everyone in the change rooms, so decided to stay out on the ground at half time. They weren't interfering with the mini league or the kick and a catch, completely a non issue. Was great to be out there mingling with players and coaches, hearing what they were saying, and hearing some Academy players ripping into Mark Clayton who was getting his calves massaged.

Maybe just the immediate team and officials for the day go in and not a cast of thousands. I have never heard of any other teams wanting there 18's , reserves and other club people in the rooms at half time.How ridiculous .
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by RustyCage »

Mountain, molehill
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
Posts: 20316
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 288 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by Big Phil »

johntheclaret
Coach
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Team: North Adelaide
Has thanked: 409 times
Been thanked: 580 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by johntheclaret »

The changing rooms were always big enough for the old Port
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by RustyCage »

I'm not sure if that headline is deliberately misleading or just accidentally misleading
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29218
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by whufc »

RustyCage wrote:I'm not sure if that headline is deliberately misleading or just accidentally misleading


How is it misleading

The coach when interviewed said they stayed on the field because the changerooms were too small

Or do you mean because it says Magpies and not Power reserves
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
scott
Veteran
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:53 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by scott »

Bounce of the ball wrote:
RustyCage wrote:With the Academy players, the AFL players and other club people there yesterday, Port decided that it would be a bit of a tight fit to have everyone in the change rooms, so decided to stay out on the ground at half time. They weren't interfering with the mini league or the kick and a catch, completely a non issue. Was great to be out there mingling with players and coaches, hearing what they were saying, and hearing some Academy players ripping into Mark Clayton who was getting his calves massaged.

Maybe just the immediate team and officials for the day go in and not a cast of thousands. I have never heard of any other teams wanting there 18's , reserves and other club people in the rooms at half time.How ridiculous .

As a side note, Port Magpies no longer have U/18s.
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:50 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by therisingblues »

RustyCage wrote:Mountain, molehill

:lol:
I'm so tempted to start making crap up now, just to make that mountain a bit bigger.
Nothing happening here folks, move on, yesterday's news!
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by RustyCage »

whufc wrote:
RustyCage wrote:I'm not sure if that headline is deliberately misleading or just accidentally misleading


How is it misleading

The coach when interviewed said they stayed on the field because the changerooms were too small

Or do you mean because it says Magpies and not Power reserves


It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
PhilH
League - Top 5
Posts: 3253
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 11:04 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Happy Valley
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 163 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by PhilH »

OK Rusty

As the writer of the headline I will bite.

If you don't like the term "rejected" what word would you use regarding Port's attitude to the facilities provided for them at half time and used by every other visiting league team to the ground over the past 57 years?

Declined ....., overlooked .... denied .... stood up .... abandoned .... passed over .... ignored ..... replaced .... ??
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
Posts: 15328
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:23 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 942 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by RustyCage »

It's been made to sound like Port have said "Those change rooms aren't up to our standards, we aren't using them", which as you'd know, is absolute crap.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:00 am
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has thanked: 870 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by southee »

RustyCage wrote:
whufc wrote:
RustyCage wrote:I'm not sure if that headline is deliberately misleading or just accidentally misleading


How is it misleading

The coach when interviewed said they stayed on the field because the changerooms were too small

Or do you mean because it says Magpies and not Power reserves


It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.


Why so many people ?? Surely a "Please, can everyone in this room who does not have to be here leave?".........who was in the room ?? The reserves team, friends and family ???
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:00 am
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has thanked: 870 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: R10 West v Port @ Richmond

Post by southee »

RustyCage wrote:
whufc wrote:
RustyCage wrote:I'm not sure if that headline is deliberately misleading or just accidentally misleading


How is it misleading

The coach when interviewed said they stayed on the field because the changerooms were too small

Or do you mean because it says Magpies and not Power reserves


It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.


Why so many people ?? Surely a "Please, can everyone in this room who does not have to be here leave?".........who was in the room ?? The reserves team, friends and family ???
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: saintal and 192 guests