Booney wrote:With the vanilla flavor of most candidates you could argue "party politics" is already dead.
not sure i agree Booney, the shindig that went on the night Abbott got the arse surely shows they still know how to party......
But not dance on tables though.
No they danced on the tables, just not very well, broke the bloody things & my local MP did his knee. I bumped into him shortly after that happened, he was "sheepish" about it when I asked "what happened"...
1961, 1971, 1976, 1978, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015.... And don't you forget it!
Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Psyber wrote:Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Psyber wrote:Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Does it really matter who is ******* who?
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Psyber wrote:Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Does it really matter who is ******* who?
i do when it is them (the polititians) ******* us (the general public)
if it is what they are doing after hours though, i agree, who cares
Psyber wrote:Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Does it really matter who is ******* who?
i do when it is them (the polititians) ******* us (the general public)
if it is what they are doing after hours though, i agree, who cares
One thing I can guarantee is that we will get ****** over no matter who wins.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Jimmy_041 wrote:[quote="Psyber"]Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Does it really matter who is ******* who?
i do when it is them (the polititians) ******* us (the general public)
if it is what they are doing after hours though, i agree, who cares
One thing I can guarantee is that we will get ****** over no matter who wins.[/quote] The worst part of every election is that it is always a polititian that wins
Jimmy_041 wrote:[quote="Psyber"]Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Does it really matter who is ******* who?
i do when it is them (the polititians) ******* us (the general public)
if it is what they are doing after hours though, i agree, who cares
One thing I can guarantee is that we will get ****** over no matter who wins.[/quote] Yep and the beauty is the general public can select the size....
Psyber wrote:Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Actually, that incident was a fairly minor part of my concern - just final proof of the general insincerity I've observed over several years. He is a bit too capital C conservative for my taste and a bit authoritarian in style - though he tries to suppress it when he thinks he needs to.
Psyber wrote:Thinking of "party politics", and the whole thing, I have a problem voting for Jamie Briggs despite being a Liberal Party member. I may have to check out the Xenophon candidate.
Just because he got caught up in the "lure of Asia"? Isn't the first and wont be the last. Rann did it at home!!!
Who knows who's sneaking home at 5am in Canberra
Actually, that incident was a fairly minor part of my concern - just final proof of the general insincerity I've observed over several years. He is a bit too capital C conservative for my taste and a bit authoritarian in style - though he tries to suppress it when he thinks he needs to.
Had to have a giggle at some of the Jamie Briggs posters up here. The one with him posing with Turnbull.... nice bit of photoshop going on there.... I really like the one that reads..... Briggs Delivers..... Exactly what he delivers I am unsure... perhaps it's broken coffee tables, and sleazy pick up lines in Hong Kong bars? I expect Briggs will hold onto Mayo, but will get a well deserved kick up the ar$e from the electorate. When Alex Downer was the local bloke Mayo was a 10% plus safe liberal seat. Briggs in just his 3rd trip (I think) to the polls has managed to turn it into a marginal seat..... well played Jamie, well played.
1961, 1971, 1976, 1978, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015.... And don't you forget it!
Booney wrote:Hard to believe this is true, but it is....
Very funny. The North Queenslanders will be pi$$ing themselves His opponents are calling for him to resign because his electorate would be "aghast" Surely they will vote him out to prove their horror
SHY's "unfortunate maritime incidents" comment was much worse but the vocal lefties never saw it
Booney wrote:Hard to believe this is true, but it is....
Very funny. The North Queenslanders will be pi$$ing themselves His opponents are calling for him to resign because his electorate would be "aghast" Surely they will vote him out to prove their horror
SHY's "unfortunate maritime incidents" comment was much worse but the vocal lefties never saw it
The lefties hahaha. Oh dear me that seem to add a new level of craziness each election.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Booney wrote:Hard to believe this is true, but it is....
Very funny. The North Queenslanders will be pi$$ing themselves His opponents are calling for him to resign because his electorate would be "aghast" Surely they will vote him out to prove their horror
SHY's "unfortunate maritime incidents" comment was much worse but the vocal lefties never saw it
The lefties hahaha. Oh dear me that seem to add a new level of craziness each election.
Bob Katter's not a leftie and I'm pretty certain that video's a new level of crazy.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.