Australian International Summer 2024/25

[Jim05]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

[Lightning McQueen]

Have the makers of Snicko come out and said why the contact wasn't picked up.

Was it because it was a pull shot so potentially furthest distance from wherever the mic is?
Was it because the contact was strong enough, i know it was a slower ball bouncer but still?
Are they holding their ground on there wasn't contact despite the footage?

Surely a third umpire can't use snicko going forward, especially if it's not clear as to why the Jaiswal incident wasn't picked up. That puts doubt in any decision going forward.

Yes they have, it is because there was ambient noise as it glided along the surface not edged it.............well words to that degree.

[whufc]

Webster is in for Marsh.

[amber_fluid]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Good call
Marsh has played a role but his time is up

Let’s hope Webster goes well until Green is fit

[Jimmy_041]

Gavaskar says Jaiswal didn’t hit it, was just an optical illusion

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/cr ... 218f50fe43

Gavaskar has lost the plot lately.
He's been drinking the India is #1 koolaid

[whufc]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Good call
Marsh has played a role but his time is up

Let’s hope Webster goes well until Green is fit

Where does Webster bat.

Does he go straight into 6 or do you push Carey up to 6, Webster at 7.

[Jim05]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Good call
Marsh has played a role but his time is up

Let’s hope Webster goes well until Green is fit

For me that tells me that they are worried about Starc’s injury and yet are still going to play him. If/when he breaks down Webster will be used to bowl.

[Jim05]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Good call
Marsh has played a role but his time is up

Let’s hope Webster goes well until Green is fit

Where does Webster bat.

Does he go straight into 6 or do you push Carey up to 6, Webster at 7.

Webster is the first bloke since Sobers in the SS to score 900 runs and take 30 wickets in a season. No mug with the bat and would just slot into Marsh’s spot at 6

[Lightning McQueen]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Just makes Ronnie look even stupider, why doesn't he just use the "we'll assess the situation and select the team when required" line.

Declaring someone a certainty and then dropping them just makes them look even more amateur.

[Lightning McQueen]

Gavaskar says Jaiswal didn’t hit it, was just an optical illusion

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/cr ... 218f50fe43

Gavaskar has lost the plot lately.
He's been drinking the India is #1 koolaid

I hate it when sportsmen that I admired greatly join commentary teams and end up being knobs.

Haydos, Langer and David King are 3 others that come to mind immediately.

[Brodlach]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Good call
Marsh has played a role but his time is up

Let’s hope Webster goes well until Green is fit

Where does Webster bat.

Does he go straight into 6 or do you push Carey up to 6, Webster at 7.

Definitely 6.

[The Dark Knight]

Sounds like Bailey overruled Ronnie and the skip.
Webster to debut tomorrow, Marsh dropped

Good call
Marsh has played a role but his time is up

Let’s hope Webster goes well until Green is fit

Where does Webster bat.

Does he go straight into 6 or do you push Carey up to 6, Webster at 7.

Webster is the first bloke since Sobers in the SS to score 900 runs and take 30 wickets in a season. No mug with the bat and would just slot into Marsh’s spot at 6

He been named at 6 @whufc
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/4192934
(It's where he has been batting for Tasmania)

[dedja]

Gavaskar says Jaiswal didn’t hit it, was just an optical illusion

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/cr ... 218f50fe43

Gavaskar has lost the plot lately.
He's been drinking the India is #1 koolaid

No surprise really, Gavaskar has been a knobus incredibilus for a long time.

[am Bays]

Have the makers of Snicko come out and said why the contact wasn't picked up.

Was it because it was a pull shot so potentially furthest distance from wherever the mic is?
Was it because the contact was strong enough, i know it was a slower ball bouncer but still?
Are they holding their ground on there wasn't contact despite the footage?

Surely a third umpire can't use snicko going forward, especially if it's not clear as to why the Jaiswal incident wasn't picked up. That puts doubt in any decision going forward.

As Simon Taufel said, if there is no clear deflection visible to the 3rd umpire Snicko is next used in the hierarchy of decision making. The fact you can also the index finger of the f glove move as the ball went past the glove is further proof of contact.

Snicko was only called for as a means to justify what he saw (after he made the call "I can see a deflection"). when snicko was inconclusive (ne clear spike but there were mermers)

All technology has error (as you know reason for the 50% of ball making contact to overturn an LBW not out) so it will be used with confidence to support the decision making process going forward.

[whufc]

Have the makers of Snicko come out and said why the contact wasn't picked up.

Was it because it was a pull shot so potentially furthest distance from wherever the mic is?
Was it because the contact was strong enough, i know it was a slower ball bouncer but still?
Are they holding their ground on there wasn't contact despite the footage?

Surely a third umpire can't use snicko going forward, especially if it's not clear as to why the Jaiswal incident wasn't picked up. That puts doubt in any decision going forward.

As Simon Taufel said, if there is no clear deflection visible to the 3rd umpire Snicko is next used in the hierarchy of decision making. The fact you can also the index finger of the f glove move as the ball went past the glove is further proof of contact.

Snicko was only called for as a means to justify what he saw (after he made the call "I can see a deflection"). when snicko was inconclusive (ne clear spike but there were mermers)

All technology has error (as you know reason for the 50% of ball making contact to overturn an LBW not out) so it will be used with confidence to support the decision making process going forward.

I guess the point i was making was if we didn't know what the issue was what confidence they would have in the circumstance that a not out was given, goes to third umpire, no clear deflection of an edge but snicko shows an edge. Ordinarily that would be given out every time, however if the makers of snicko couldn't give a reason for the non-detection of an edge how sure could we be in the technology that is accurately reading edges at all.

[Armchair expert]

Pant dropped too apparently

[Lightning McQueen]

I guess the point i was making was if we didn't know what the issue was what confidence they would have in the circumstance that a not out was given, goes to third umpire, no clear deflection of an edge but snicko shows an edge. Ordinarily that would be given out every time, however if the makers of snicko couldn't give a reason for the non-detection of an edge how sure could we be in the technology that is accurately reading edges at all.

The mistake was made by showing everyone the snicko reading once the 3rd umpire had determined that contact had been made, if no one seen that then there would never have been such an outcry.

Once a verdict of beyond doubt has been reached there is no point doing any further investigations.

Would we have been hanging shit on the system if the shoe was on the other foot? Probably.

[am Bays]

Pant dropped too apparently

Due to his shot decision making or the animate conversation with Sharma at the end of day 4....

[amber_fluid]

I guess the point i was making was if we didn't know what the issue was what confidence they would have in the circumstance that a not out was given, goes to third umpire, no clear deflection of an edge but snicko shows an edge. Ordinarily that would be given out every time, however if the makers of snicko couldn't give a reason for the non-detection of an edge how sure could we be in the technology that is accurately reading edges at all.

The mistake was made by showing everyone the snicko reading once the 3rd umpire had determined that contact had been made, if no one seen that then there would never have been such an outcry.

Once a verdict of beyond doubt has been reached there is no point doing any further investigations.

Would we have been hanging shit on the system if the shoe was on the other foot? Probably.

Use technology 100% or don’t
Can’t just use it ‘some times’ when it suits
Snicko showed nothing so it’s not out for me

[Lightning McQueen]

.